1887
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1876-1933
  • E-ISSN: 1876-1941
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Construction grammar across borders, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/cf.00033.int-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cf.00033.int
2020-07-29
2020-08-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S.
    (Eds.) (2015) Diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergen, B., & Chang, N.
    (2013) Embodied construction grammar. InT. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.168–190). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies, M.
    (2013) Corpus of global web-based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20countries (GloWbE). Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/glowbe
  4. De Knop, S., & Gilquin, G.
    (Eds.) (2016) Applied construction grammar. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110458268
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1989) On grammatical constructions. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R. R., & Rhomieux, R.
    (2012) The FrameNet constructicon. InH. C. Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp.309–371). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldberg, A.
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G.
    (Eds.) (2013) The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1997) Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 1–32. 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Östman, J-O., & Fried, M.
    (Eds.) (2005) Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Schmid, H.
    (2000) English abstract nouns as conceptual shells. From corpus to cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
  14. Stephanowitsch, A.
    (2013) Collostructional analysis. InT. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.290–306). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Traugott, E. Closs
    (2010) Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. InK. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification, and grammaticalization (pp.27–70). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Traugott, E. Closs, & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cf.00033.int
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error