K. Aaron Smith & Dawn Nordquist (Eds.) (2018). Functionalist and Usage-based Approaches to the Study of Language. In honor of Joan L. Bybee

References

1. Bavin, E. L.
   (2004) Focusing on where. InS. Stromqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, Vol. 2 (pp.17–35). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bavin, E. L.
   (2013) The acquisition of ergative case in Warlpiri. InE. Bavin & S. Stoll (Eds.), The acquisition of ergativity [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 9] (pp.107–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.9.05bav
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.9.05bav [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, P., Pfeiler, B., de Léon, L., & Pye, C.
   (2013) The acquisition of ergativity in four Mayan languages. InE. Bavin & S. Stoll (Eds.), The acquisition of ergativity [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 9] (pp.271–305). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.9.10bro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.9.10bro [Google Scholar]
4. Bybee, J. L.
   (2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
5. Bybee, J. L.
   (2002) Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. InT. Givón & B. Malle (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language [Typological Studies in Language 53] (pp.107–132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.53.07byb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.53.07byb [Google Scholar]
6. Bybee, J. L.
   (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
7. Bybee, J. L.
   (2012) Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivations for sound change. InM. J. Solé & D. Recasens (Eds.), The initiation of sound change: Perception, production, and social factors [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 323] (pp.211–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.323.16byb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.323.16byb [Google Scholar]
8. Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
   (1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Claridge, C.
   (2000) Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004333840
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333840 [Google Scholar]
10. Eddington, D.
    (2011) What are the contextual phonetic variants of /β ð ɣ/ in colloquial Spanish. Probus, 23, 1–19. 10.1515/prbs.2011.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2011.001 [Google Scholar]
11. Narasimhan, Bh.
    (2005) Splitting the notion of “agent”. Case marking in early Hindi. Journal of Child Language, 32, 787–803. doi:  10.1017/S0305000905007117
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905007117 [Google Scholar]
12. Narasimhan, Bh.
    (2013) Ergative case-marking in Hindi child-caregiver speech. InE. Bavin & S. Stoll (Eds.), The acquisition of ergativity [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 9] (pp.209–237). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.9.08nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.9.08nar [Google Scholar]