Semantic polyfunctionality and constructional networks

References

1. Barberá, P.
   (2018) streamR: Access to Twitter streaming API via R. R package version 0.4.4.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Corr, A. V.
   (2016) Ibero-Romance and the Syntax of the Utterance. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Corr, A. V.
   (2018) The syntax of Ibero-Romance quotation. InG. Pană Dindelegan, A. Dragomirescu, I. Nicula & A. Nicola (Eds.), Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives on Romance Syntax (pp.255–288). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Demonte, V. & Fernández Soriano, O.
   (2007) La periferia izquierda oracional y los complementantes del español. InJ. Cuartero & M. Emsel (Eds.), Vernetzungen: Kognition, Bedeutung, (kontrastive) Pragmatik (pp.133–147). Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Demonte, V. & Fernández Soriano, O.
   (2009) Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus, 21, 23–49.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Demonte, V. & Fernández Soriano, O.
   (2013) El que citativo, otros elementos de la periferia izquierda oracional y la recomplementación: Variación inter e intralingüística. InD. Jakob & K. Plooj (Eds.), Autour de que – El entorno de que (pp.47–69). Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Demonte, V. & Fernández Soriano, O.
   (2014) Evidentiality and illocutionary force: Spanish matrix “que” at the syntax-pragmatics interface. InA. Dufter & Á. S. Octavio de Toledo (Eds.), Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist, and typological perspectives (pp.217–252). John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
8. D’Hertefelt, S.
   (2018) Insubordination in Germanic: A typology of complement and conditional constructions. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110548686
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110548686 [Google Scholar]
9. D’Hertefelt, S. & Verstraete, J. C.
   (2014) Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 89–102. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
10. De Rycker, T.
    (1990) Imperative Subtypes in Conversational British English: An empirical investigation. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Elvira García, W.
    (2016) La prosodia de las construcciones insubordinadas conectivo-argumentativas del español. PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Etxepare, R.
    (2010) From hearsay evidentiality to samesaying relations. Lingua, 120, 604–627. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.009 [Google Scholar]
13. Evans, N.
    (2007) Insubordination and its uses. InI. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp.366–431). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1996) The pragmatics of constructions. InD. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (Eds.), Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp.53–69). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ford, C., Fox, B. & Thompson, S.
    (2002) The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gagolewski, M. & Tartanus, B.
    (2016) R Package Stringi: Character String Processing Facilities. www.gagolewski.com/software/stringi/
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gras, P.
    (2011) Gramática de construcciones en interacción: Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gras, P.
    (2016a) Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination: Que-initial sentences in Spanish. InN. Evans & H. Watanabe (Eds.), Insubordination (pp.113–144). John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gras, P.
    (2016b) Entre la codificación y la inferencia: Los valores citativos de que inicial átono en español. InR. González Ruiz, D. Izquierdo Alegría & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), La evidencialidad en español: Teoría y descripción (pp.200–223). Vervuert/Iberoamericana.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jørgensen, A. M.
    (Ed.) (2016) Corpus Oral del Lenguaje Adolescente (COLA). www.colam.org/om_prosj-espannol.html
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kay, P. & Michaelis, L.
    (2012) Constructional meaning and compositionality. InC. Maienborn, K von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp.2271–2296). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110253382.2271
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253382.2271 [Google Scholar]
22. Panther, K. & Thornburg, L.
    (2011) Emotion and desire in independent complement clauses: A case study from German. InM. Brdar, S. Gries & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp.87–114). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.32.09pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.09pan [Google Scholar]
23. PRESEEA
    PRESEEA (2014–) Corpus del Proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América. Universidad de Alcalá. preseea.linguas.net
    [Google Scholar]
24. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
    [Google Scholar]
25. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española (2018) Gramática de la lengua Española. Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Rizzi, L.
    (1997) The fine structure of Left Periphery. InL. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of Grammar (pp.281–336). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
27. Ronan, P.
    (2015) Categorizing expressive speech acts in the pragmatically annotated SPICE Ireland corpus. ICAME Journal, 39, 25–45. 10.1515/icame‑2015‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2015-0002 [Google Scholar]
28. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
29. Samper, J. A., Hernández Cabrera, C. E. & Troya, M.
    (Eds.) (1998) Macrocorpus de la norma lingüística culta de las principales ciudades del mundo hispánico (MC-NLCH). CD-ROM. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sansiñena, M. S.
    (2015) The multiple functional load of que. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sansiñena, M. S.
    (2017) Eliciting evidence of functional differences: The imperative versus free-standing que-clauses in Spanish. InD. Van Olmen & S. Heinold (Eds.), Imperatives and Directive Strategies (pp.265–289). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.184.09san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.09san [Google Scholar]
32. Sansiñena, M. S., De Smet, H. & Cornillie, B.
    (2015) Displaced directives: Subjunctive free-standing que-clauses vs. imperatives in Spanish. Folia Linguistica, 49, 257–285. 10.1515/flin‑2015‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0008 [Google Scholar]
33. Searle, J. R.
    (1969) Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
34. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. InE. Ochs, S. Thompson & E. Schegloff (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp.52–133). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
35. Schmid, H.
    (2016) Treetagger. Retrieved from: www.cis.uni-muenchen.de/~schmid/tools/TreeTagger/namemba_princesa
36. Siemund, P.
    (2018) Speech Acts and Clause Types: English in a cross-linguistic context. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sommerer, L. & Smirnova, E.
    Introduction: The nature of the node and the network. Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. InL. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.) (2020) Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Takahashi, H.
    (2012) A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative: With special reference to Japanese imperatives. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.35 [Google Scholar]
39. Traugott, E.
    (2018) Modeling language change with constructional networks. InS. Pons Bordería & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New issues in the study of language change (pp.17–50). Brill. 10.1163/9789004375420_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375420_003 [Google Scholar]
40. Van de Velde, F.
    (2014) Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. InR. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar (pp.141–179). Walter De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Van Olmen, D.
    (2011) The Imperative in English and Dutch: A functional analysis in comparable and parallel corpora. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Verstraete, J. C., D’Hertefelt, S. & Van linden, A.
    (2012) A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language, 36, 123–153. 10.1075/sl.36.1.04ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.1.04ver [Google Scholar]