Clause linkage and degrees of grammaticalization

References

1. Askedal, J. O.
   (1997) Drohen und versprechen als sogenannte ‚Modalitätsverben‘ in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 34, 12–19. 10.37307/j.2198‑2430.1997.01.05
   https://doi.org/10.37307/j.2198-2430.1997.01.05 [Google Scholar]
2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S.
   (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
3. Bech, G.
   (1955) Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum. Einar Munksgaard.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Comrie, B.
   (1989) Language universals and linguistic typology. Syntax and morphology. 2nd ed.The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cornillie, B.
   (2008) On the grammaticalization and (inter)subjectivity of evidential (semi-)auxiliaries in Spanish. InE. Seoane & M. José López-Couso (Eds.), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization (pp. 55–76). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.77.05cor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.05cor [Google Scholar]
6. Diessel, H.
   (2019) The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671040
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
7. Diewald, G.
   (1999) Die Modalverben im Deutschen. Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110945942
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110945942 [Google Scholar]
8. Diewald, G.
   (2000) A basic semantic template for lexical and grammaticalized uses of the German modals. InJ. van der Auwera & P. Dendale (Eds.), Modal verbs in Germanic and Romance languages. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 14, 23–41. 10.1075/bjl.14.03die
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.14.03die [Google Scholar]
9. Diewald, G.
   (2006) Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. InD. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions. Special Volume 1: Constructions all over – case studies and theoretical implications. https://constructions.journals.hhu.de/article/view/443.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Diewald, G. & Smirnova, E.
    (2010) Evidentiality in German. Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110241037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241037 [Google Scholar]
11. Diewald, G. & Stathi, K.
    (2019) Two distinct sources – one target: A diachronic contrastive study of the grammaticalization of German scheinen and English seem. Functions of Language, 26, 177–215. 10.1075/fol.15062.sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15062.sta [Google Scholar]
12. Diewald, G., Dekalo, V. & Czicza, D.
    (2021) Grammaticalization of verdienen into an auxiliary marker of deontic modality: An item-driven usage-based approach. InM. Hilpert, B. Cappelle & I. Depraetere (Eds.), Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 81–122). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.32.04die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.32.04die [Google Scholar]
13. Duden. Die Grammatik
    Duden. Die Grammatik (2016) Dudenredaktion (Eds.). Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fabricius-Hansen, C.
    (1992) Subordination. InL. Hoffmann (Ed.), Deutsche Syntax. Ansichten und Aussichten (pp. 458–483). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Geyken, A.
    (2007) The DWDS corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20th century. InCh. Fellbaum (Ed.), Idioms and collocations: Corpus-based linguistic and lexicographic studies (pp. 23–41) Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Heine, B. & H. Miyashita
    (2008) Accounting for a functional category: German drohen ‘to threaten’. Language Sciences, 30, 53–101. 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.05.003 [Google Scholar]
17. Himmelmann, N.
    (2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?InW. Bisang, N. Himmelmann & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A Look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Holler, A.
    (2013) Reanalyzing German correlative ̦esʻ. InS. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 90–109). CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kuteva, T.
    (2001) Auxiliation. An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lehmann, Ch.
    (1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. InJ. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 181–225). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
21. Lehmann, Ch.
    (2015) Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd ed. Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603353
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603353 [Google Scholar]
22. Los, B.
    (2005) The rise of the to-infinitive. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274765.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274765.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Pütz, H.
    (1975) Über die Syntax der Pronominalform ̦esʼ im modernen Deutsch. 2nd ed. Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Reis, M.
    (2005) Zur Grammatik der sog. ‘Halbmodale’ drohen/ versprechen + Infinitiv. InF. J. d’Avis (Ed.), Deutsche Syntax. Empirie und Theorie. Symposium Göteborg 13.-15- Mai 2004 (pp.125–145). Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ulvestad, B. & Bergenholtz, H.
    (1979) ‚Esʻ als Vorgreifer eines Objektsatzes. Teil 1. Deutsche Sprache, 7, 97–116.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ulvestad, B. & Bergenholtz, H.
    (1983) ‚Esʻ als Vorgreifer eines Objektsatzes. Teil 2. Deutsche Sprache, 11, 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Zifonun, G., Hoffmann, L. & Strecker, B.
    (1997) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. In 3 Bänden. Mouton de Gruyter. (Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache).
    [Google Scholar]
28. Zitterbart, J. P.
    (2002) Zur korrelativen Subordination im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110911657
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911657 [Google Scholar]