Constructional change and frameelement selection

References

1. ARTFL-Frantext corpus
   ARTFL-Frantext corpus (2022) ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine. https://artfl-project.uchicago.edu/content/artfl-frantext
2. Bainville, J.
   (1931) Napoléon. Fayard.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B.
   (1998) The Berkeley FrameNet Project. InP. Isabelle, L. Da Sylva, F. Fauteux, R. Kittredge, G. Lapalme, M.-C. L’Homme, & A. Thériault (Eds.), COLING-ACL ’98: Proceedings of the Conference, held at the University of Montréal (pp. 86–90). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
   (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
5. Bouso, T.
   (2020) The growth of the transitivising Reaction Object Construction. Constructions & Frames, 12(2), 239–271. 10.1075/cf.00041.bou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00041.bou [Google Scholar]
6. Bybee, J. L.
   (2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
7. Candito, M., Amsili, P., Barque, L., Benamara, F., de Gael, C., Djemaa, M., & Vieu, L.
   (2014) Developing a French FrameNet: Methodology and first results. InN. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, H. Loftsson, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Edition of the Language, Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 1372–1379). Reykjavik, Iceland: European Language Resources Association.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coleman, J.
   (2005) Public reading and the reading public in Late Medieval England and France. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Croft, W.
   (2001) Radical construction grammar. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Croft, W.
    (2007) Construction Grammar. InD. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 463–508). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. de Clari, R.
    (1924) La conquête de Constantinople. Paris: Champion. (Original work published 1216)
    [Google Scholar]
12. de Joinville, J.
    (1998) Mémoires ou Vie de saint Louis. Garnier Flammarion. (Original work published 1305)
    [Google Scholar]
13. de Livoy, T.
    (1788) Dictionnaire de synonymes françois. Second edition. N. Beauzée (Ed.). Nyon.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Djemaa, M., Candito, M., Muller, P., & Vieu, L.
    (2016) Corpus annotation within the French FrameNet: A domain-by-domain methodology. InN. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Edition of the Language, Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 3794–3801). European Language Resources Association.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eisenstein, E. L.
    (1980) The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107049963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107049963 [Google Scholar]
16. Elvira, J.
    (2011) Constructions of uncontrolled state or event: The increase in productivity of a new argument structure in Old Spanish. Constructions & Frames, 3(2), 184–207. 10.1075/cf.3.2.02elv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.3.2.02elv [Google Scholar]
17. Fillmore, C. J.Linguistic Society of Korea
    (1982) Frame semantics. InLinguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1989) Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. InR. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 17–38). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑444‑87144‑2.50004‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-87144-2.50004-5 [Google Scholar]
19. Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R. L.
    (2003) Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235–250. 10.1093/ijl/16.3.235
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.3.235 [Google Scholar]
20. Fried, M.
    (2007) A Frame Semantic account of morphosemantic change: The case of Old Czech věřící. InD. Divjak & A. Kochanska (Eds.), Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain (pp. 291–328). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198799.4.291
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198799.4.291 [Google Scholar]
21. Fried, M.
    (2009) Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames, 1(2), 261–290. 10.1075/cf.1.2.04fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.1.2.04fri [Google Scholar]
22. Froissart, J.
    (1962) Chroniques, livre premier. Droz. (Original work published 1399)
    [Google Scholar]
23. Georgakopoulos, T.
    (2018) A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry: Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames, 10(1), 61–97. 10.1075/cf.00011.geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00011.geo [Google Scholar]
24. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hamunen, M. V. J.
    (2017) On the grammaticalization of Finnish colorative construction. Constructions and Frames, 9(1), 101–138. 10.1075/cf.9.1.04ham
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.9.1.04ham [Google Scholar]
27. Harris, J. & Reichl, K.
    (2012) Performance and performers. InK. Reichl (Ed.), Medieval oral literature (pp. 141–202). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hilpert, M.
    (2016) Change in modal meanings. Constructions and Frames, 8(1), 66–85. 10.1075/cf.8.1.05hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.1.05hil [Google Scholar]
29. Hilpert, M. & Bourgeois, S.
    (2020) Intersubjectification in constructional change: From confrontation to solidarity in the sarcastic much? construction. Constructions and Frames, 12(1), 96–120. 10.1075/cf.00036.hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00036.hil [Google Scholar]
30. Koch, P.
    (1999) Cognitive aspects of semantic change and polysemy: The semantic space HAVE/BE. InA. Blank (Ed.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 279–305). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110804195.279
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804195.279 [Google Scholar]
31. Koch, P.
    (2000) Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical: aspect onomasiologique. InJ. François (Ed.), Théories contemporaines du changement sémantique (pp. 75–97). Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kuo, Y. H.
    (2020) Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar: The case of classifier xiē in Mandarin Chinese. Constructions and Frames, 12(2), 206–238. 10.1075/cf.00040.kuo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00040.kuo [Google Scholar]
33. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Law, J.
    (2019) Diachronic frame analysis: The Purpose frame in French. Constructions and Frames, 11(1), 42–77. 10.1075/cf.00023.law
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00023.law [Google Scholar]
35. Martineau, F.
    (2008) Un Corpus pour l’analyse de la variation et du changement linguistique. Corpus, 7(1), 135–155. 10.4000/corpus.1508
    https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.1508 [Google Scholar]
36. Martineau, F., Diaconescu, R., & Hirschbühler, P.
    (2007) Le Corpus Voies du français: de l’élaboration à l’annotation. InP. Kunstmann & A. Stein (Eds.), Le Nouveau Corpus d’Amsterdam (pp. 121–142). Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mousket, P.
    (1836) Chronique. P. F. Dembowski (Ed.). Commission Royale d’Histoire. (Original work published 1243)
    [Google Scholar]
38. Noël, D.
    (2007) Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14(2), 177–202. 10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe [Google Scholar]
39. Noël, D.
    (2008) The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: A diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(4), 314–340. 10.1177/0075424208321750
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424208321750 [Google Scholar]
40. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
41. Reybaud, L.
    (1844) Jérôme Paturot à la recherche d’une position sociale. Paulin. (Original work published 1842)
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., Baker, C. F., & Scheffczyk, J.
    (2016) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley, California. https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/the_book
    [Google Scholar]
43. Scarlini, B., Pasini, T., & Navigli, R.
    (2020) Sense-annotated corpora for word sense disambiguation in multiple languages and domains. InN. Calzolari, F. Béchet, P. Blache, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 5905–5911). European Language Resources Association.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Traugott, E. C.
    (2016) Do semantic modal maps have a role in a constructionalization approach to modals?Constructions and Frames, 8(1), 98–125. 10.1075/cf.8.1.07tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.1.07tra [Google Scholar]
45. Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
46. Trousdale, G., & Norde, M.
    (2013) Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: two case studies. Language Sciences, 361, 32–46. 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.018 [Google Scholar]