English and German derivation revisited

References

1. Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I.
   (2013) The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747062.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Bendzko, T.
   (2011) Nur noch kurz die Welt retten. Bendzko, T. Wenn Worte meine Sprache wären. Meyer, S. (Producer). Sony Music Entertainment.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Booij, G.
   (2010) Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Booij, G., & Masini, F.
   (2015) The role of second order schemas in the construction of complex words. InBauer, L., Kőrtvélyessy, L., & Štekauer, P. (Eds.). Semantics of complex words. (pp. 47–66). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑14102‑2_4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14102-2_4 [Google Scholar]
5. Booij, G.
   (2018) Introduction and overview. InBooij, G. (Ed.). The construction of words. (pp.3–16). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑74394‑3_1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_1 [Google Scholar]
6. Booij, G.
   (2019) The role of schemas in Construction Morphology. Word Structure12(3), 385–395. 10.3366/word.2019.0154
   https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0154 [Google Scholar]
7. Diewald, G., & Politt, K.
   (Eds.) (2022) Paradigms regained: Theoretical and empirical arguments for the reassessment of the notion of paradigm. Language Science Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dixon, R. M. W.
   (2014) Making new words. Morphological derivation in English. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712367.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712367.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. DWDS – Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache
   DWDS – Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (2023) Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Ed.) https://www.dwds.de
10. Eitelmann, M.; Haugland, K., & Haumann, D.
    (2020) From engl-isc to whatever-ish: A corpus-based investigation of ‑ish-derivation in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics24(4), 1–31. 10.1017/S1360674319000340
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674319000340 [Google Scholar]
11. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2009) The nature of generalization in language. Cognitive Linguistics20(1), 93–127. 10.1515/COGL.2009.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.005 [Google Scholar]
13. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2019) Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hein, K.
    (2017) Modeling the properties of German phrasal compounds within a usage-based constructional approach. InTrips, C., & Kornfilt, J. (Eds.): Further investigations into the nature of phrasal compounding (pp. 119–148) Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hilpert, M.
    (2019) Higher-order schemas in morphology: What they are, how they work, and where to find them. Word Structure12(3), 262–273. 10.3366/word.2019.0149
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0149 [Google Scholar]
16. Himmelmann, N.
    (2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthognal?InBisang, W., Himmelmann, N., & Wiemer, B. (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42) Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197440.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440.1.21 [Google Scholar]
17. Kempf, L.
    (2016) Adjektivsuffixe in Konkurrenz. Wortbildungswandel vom Frühneuhochdeutschen zum Neuhochdeutsch. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429787
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429787 [Google Scholar]
18. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N.
    (2009) Change in contemporary English. A grammatical study. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
20. Lensch, A.
    (2018) Fixer-uppers: Reduplication in the derivation of phrasal verbs. InFinkbeiner, R., & Freywald, U. (Eds.) Exact repetition in grammar and discourse, (pp. 158–181) Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110592498‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110592498-007 [Google Scholar]
21. Lensch, A.
    (2020) Onlookers, passers-by, sweeper-uppers, opt-outers and dumber-downerers. A corpus-based study of English -er nominalizations. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität MainzPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lensch, A.
    (2022) Diggers-out, leaf clearer-uppers and stayer-onner-for-nowers: On creativity and extravagance in English ‑er nominalizations. InEitelmann, M. & Haumann, D. (Eds.) Extravagant morphology. (pp. 73–100) John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.223.04len
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.223.04len [Google Scholar]
23. Marchand, H.
    (19692) Categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation. A synchronic-diachronic approach. Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Meibauer, J., Guttropf, A., & Scherer, C.
    (2004) Dynamic aspects of German ‑er-nominals: A probe into the interrelation of language change and language acquisition. Linguistics42(1), 155–193. 10.1515/ling.2004.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.002 [Google Scholar]
25. Norde, M.
    (2009) Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
26. Norde, M., & Trousdale, G.
    (2016) Exaptation from the perspective of Construction Morphology. Norde, M., & Van de Velde, F. (Eds) Exaptation and language change. (pp. 163–195). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.336.06nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.336.06nor [Google Scholar]
27. Oxford English Dictionary Online
    Oxford English Dictionary Online (2023) Oxford University Press. www.oed.com
28. Onysko, A.
    (2019) Processes of language contact in English influence on German. InHickey, R. (Ed.) English in the German-speaking world. (pp. 185–207) Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108768924.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108768924.010 [Google Scholar]
29. Plag, I.
    (2003) Word-formation in English (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511841323
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323 [Google Scholar]
30. Pounder, A.
    (2000) Processes and paradigms in word-formation morphology. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110814378
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110814378 [Google Scholar]
31. Rosch, E.
    (1975) Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology71, 532–547. 10.1016/0010‑0285(75)90021‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90021-3 [Google Scholar]
32. Ryder, M. E.
    (1999) Bankers and blue-chippers. Of ‑er nominalizations in Present-day English. English Language and Linguistics3(2), 269–297. 10.1017/S1360674399000246
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674399000246 [Google Scholar]
33. Ryder, M. E.
    (2000) Complex ‑er nominals: Where grammaticalization and lexicalization meet?InContini-Morava, E., & Tobin, Y. (Eds.) Between grammar and lexicon (pp. 291–332). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.183.21ryd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.183.21ryd [Google Scholar]
34. Scherer, C.
    (2005) Wortbildungswandel und Produktivität. Eine empirische Studie zur nominalen -er-Derivation im Deutschen.: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110914887
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110914887 [Google Scholar]
35. Sketch Engine
    Sketch Engine (2023) Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (Ed.) https://www.sketchengine.eu/
36. The Guardian (and the Observer) Corpus
    The Guardian (and the Observer) Corpus (1990–2004) provided byJohannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany.
37. Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
38. Trips, C.
    (2009) Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology. The development of -hood, -dom and -ship in the history of English. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783484971318
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484971318 [Google Scholar]
39. Werner, M.
    (2020) Three diachronic sources for the development of ‑erei-based synthetic compounds in German. Word Structure13(3), 347–370. 10.3366/word.2020.0175
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2020.0175 [Google Scholar]
40. Woerterbuchnetz.de
    Woerterbuchnetz.de (2023) Kompetenzzentrum – Trier Center for Digital Humanities (Ed.) https://woerterbuchnetz.de/#0
41. Wurzel, W. U.
    (1996) Morphologischer Strukturwandel: Typologische Entwicklungen im Deutschen. InLang, E., & Zifonun, G. (Eds.): Deutsch typologisch (pp. 492–524). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110622522‑022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110622522-022 [Google Scholar]
42. Zwicky, A. M., & Pullum, G. K.
    (1983) Cliticisation vs. inflection. Language59(3), 502–513. 10.2307/413900
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413900 [Google Scholar]