1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Constructions and Frames
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Exploring the form of Italian diminutives
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an extensive analysis of the formal features displayed by Italian diminutives (especially allomorphy) by using surface alternation patterns automatically extracted from a dataset of base-diminutive pairs. Applying the theoretical tools provided by Construction Morphology (CxM), we take alternation patterns as a proxy for paradigmatic relations and locate them into separate hierarchies, exploiting the mechanism of multiple inheritance in order to express generalizations on different, mutually independent factors at play (i.e., lexical category, gender and final segment of the base and derivative, suffixes and antesuffixal phonological material displayed by the derivative). In doing so, we contribute to the exploration of the formal side of Italian diminutives, which have been so far addressed mostly from a semantic perspective, and to the refinement of the representation of formal phenomena such as allomorphy according to the CxM framework.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cf.23028.mic
2025-04-24
2025-05-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cf.23028.mic
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackerman, F., Blevins, J. P., & Malouf, R.
    (2009) Parts and wholes: Patterns of relatedness in complex morphological systems and why they matter. InJ. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Audring, J.
    (2022) Advances in morphological theory: Construction Morphology and relational morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics, , –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑031120‑115118
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-115118 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer, L.
    (1997) Evaluative morphology: In search of universals. Studies in Language, (), –. 10.1075/sl.21.3.04bau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21.3.04bau [Google Scholar]
  4. (2019) Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure, (), –. 10.3366/word.2019.0144
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0144 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beniamine, S.
    (2018) Classifications flexionnelles. Étude quantitative des structures de paradigmes. [Doctoral thesis]. Université Sorbonne Paris Cité-Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7).
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Blevins, J. P.
    (2016) Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonami, O., & Beniamine, S.
    (2016) Joint predictiveness in inflectional paradigms. Word Structure, (), –. 10.3366/word.2016.0092
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2016.0092 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonami, O., & Boyé, G.
    (2014) De formes en thèmes. InF. Villoing, S. Leroy & S. David (Eds.), Foisonnements morphologiques. Études en hommage à Françoise Kerleroux (pp.–). Presses Universitaires de Paris-Ouest.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonami, O., & Strnadová, J.
    (2019) Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology, (), –. 10.1007/s11525‑018‑9322‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-018-9322-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Booij, G.
    (1997) Autonomous morphology and paradigmatic relations. InG. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp.–). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3718‑0_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3718-0_4 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2010) Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. (Ed.) (2018) The construction of words: Advances in Construction Morphology. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑74394‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cinque, G.
    (2015) Augmentative, pejorative, diminutive and endearing heads in the extended nominal projection. InE. Di Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.223.04cin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.04cin [Google Scholar]
  14. D’Achille, P., & Thornton, A. M.
    (2003) La flessione del nome dall’italiano antico all’italiano contemporaneo. InN. Maraschio & T. Poggi Salani (Eds.), Italia Linguistica Anno Mille-Italia Linguistica Anno Duemila, (pp.–). Bulzoni.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dressler, W. U., & Merlini Barbaresi, L.
    (1989) Interfissi e non-interfissi antesuffissali nell’italiano, spagnolo e inglese. InF. Foresti, P. Benedini & E. Rizzi (Eds.), L’italiano tra le lingue romanze (pp.–). Bulzoni.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (1992) Italian diminutives as non-prototypical word formation. InL. Tonelli, L. & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Natural morphology: Perspectives for the nineties, (pp.–). Unipress.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (1994) Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110877052
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877052 [Google Scholar]
  18. Férnandez-Dominguéz, J., Bagasheva, A., & Clares, C. L.
    (Eds.) (2020) Paradigmatic relations in word formation. Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grandi, N.
    (1998) Sui suffissi diminutivi. Lingua e stile, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (2002) Morfologie in contatto. Le costruzioni valutative nelle lingue del Mediterraneo. Franco Angeli.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (2011) Renewal and innovation in the emergence of Indo-European evaluative morphology. Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology, , –. 10.4000/lexis.403
     https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.403 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2017) I diminutivi come marche di attenuazione e indeterminatezza. InO. D. Balaş, A. Ciama, M. Enăchescu, A. Gebăilă & R. Voicu (Eds.), L’expression de l’imprécision dans les langues romanes (pp.–). Ars docendi-Universitatea din București.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Grandi, N., & Körtvélyessy, L.
    (2015) Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748681754
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748681754 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hathout, N., & Namer, F.
    (2019) Paradigms in word formation: What are we up to?Morphology, (), –. 10.1007/s11525‑019‑09344‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-019-09344-3 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jurafsky, D.
    (1993) Universals in the semantics of the diminutive. InJ. S. Guenter, B. A. Kaiser & C. C. Zoll (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Semantic Typology and Semantic Universals (pp.–). Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v19i1.1531
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v19i1.1531 [Google Scholar]
  26. Masini, F., & Audring, J.
    (2019) Construction Morphology. InJ. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.25
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668984.013.25 [Google Scholar]
  27. Merlini Barbaresi, L.
    (2004) Paradigma dei suffissi alterativi. InM. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp.–). Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (2012) Combinatorial patterns among Italian evaluative affixes. SKASE Journal of theoretical linguistics, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Marle, J.
    (1984) On the paradigmatic dimension of morphological creativity. Foris. 10.1515/9783111558387
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111558387 [Google Scholar]
  30. Merlini Barbaresi, L., & Dressler, W. U.
    (2020) Pragmatic explanations in morphology. InV. Pirrelli, I. Plag & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Word knowledge and word usage: A cross-disciplinary guide to the mental lexicon (pp.–). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110440577‑011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440577-011 [Google Scholar]
  31. Noccetti, S., De Marco, A., Tonelli, L., & Dressler, W. U.
    (2007) The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Italian morphology. InW. U. Dressler & I. Savickienė (Eds.), The acquisition of diminutives (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.43.06noc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.43.06noc [Google Scholar]
  32. Prieto, V. M.
    (2005) Spanish evaluative morphology: Pragmatic, sociolinguistic, and semantic issues. University of Florida.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2015) The semantics of evaluative morphology. InN. Grandi & L. Körtvélyessy (Eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology (pp.–). Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748681754‑006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748681754-006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rainer, F.
    (1990) Appunti sui diminutivi italiani in -etto e -ino. InM. Berretta, P. Molinelli & A. Valentini (Eds.), Parallela 4. Morfologia. Atti del V incontro italo-austriaco della Società di linguistica italiana (Bergamo, 2–4 ottobre 1989) (pp.–). Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Ruz, A. E., Lara-Clares, C., & Fernández-Alcaina, C.
    (Eds.) (2022) Paradigms in word formation. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.225
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.225 [Google Scholar]
  36. Štekauer, P.
    (2014) Derivational paradigms. InR. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology (pp.–). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Stump, G. T.
    (1993) How peculiar is evaluative morphology?. Studies in language, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Stump, G. T., & Finkel, R. A.
    (2013) Morphological typology: From word to paradigm. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139248860
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248860 [Google Scholar]
  39. Van der Spuy, A.
    (2017) Construction Morphology and inflection. Lingua, , –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.07.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2020) English plurals in Construction Morphology. Language Sciences, . 101240. 10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101240
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101240 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wurzel, W. U.
    (1984) Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit: Ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. Akademie-Verlag. 10.1515/9783112709658
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112709658 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.23028.mic
Loading
Exploring the form of Italian diminutives
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.23028.mic
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.23028.mic
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.23028.mic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Construction Morphology ; allomorphy ; alternation patterns ; diminutives ; Italian

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error