1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Constructions and Frames
  4. Volume 17, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1876-1933
  • E-ISSN: 1876-1941
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examines the theoretical status as well as the quantitative distribution of subjects with Definite Null Instantiation (DNI) readings in Standard British English, Hong Kong English, and Singapore English from the perspective of Usage-based Construction Grammar. Following an extensive review of previous theoretical treatments, I propose an alternative formalization of DNI as a both schematic and semantically rich construction. Based on spoken data from the International Corpus of English, random forests and logistic regression models were then fitted to complement the theoretical model of DNI with distributional data, taking into account both intra- and extra-linguistic predictors. The models reveal significant differences between L1- and L2-usage; the extent of these constructional reconfigurations is best explained by a combination of substrate influence and the socio-cognitive stability of the L2-varieties.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cf.24007.bus
2025-07-17
2026-05-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cf.24007.bus
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allerton, D. J.
    (1975) Deletion and proform reduction. Journal of Linguistics, 11(2), 213–237. 10.1017/S0022226700004540
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700004540 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsagoff, L., & Ho, C. L.
    (1998) The grammar of Singapore English. InJ. Foley (Ed.), English in new cultural contexts: Reflections from Singapore (pp.127–174). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Banerjee, M., Ding, Y., & Noone, A.-M.
    (2012) Identifying representative trees from ensembles. Statistics in Medicine, 31(15), 1601–1616. 10.1002/sim.4492
     https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4492 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bao, Z.
    (2001) The origins of empty categories in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 16(2), 275–319. 10.1075/jpcl.16.2.03zhi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.16.2.03zhi [Google Scholar]
  5. (2015) The making of vernacular Singapore English: System, transfer and filter. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139135375
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135375 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bao, Z., & Lye, H. M.
    (2005) Systemic transfer, topic prominence, and the bare conditional in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 20(2), 269–291. 10.1075/jpcl.20.2.03zhi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.20.2.03zhi [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauer, E.-M., & Hoffmann, T.
    (2020) Turns out is not ellipsis? A usage-based construction grammar view on reduced constructions. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 52(2), 240–259. 10.1080/03740463.2020.1777036
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2020.1777036 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boas, H. C.
    (2005) From theory to practice: Frame Semantics and the design of FrameNet. InS. Langer & D. Schnorbusch (Eds.), Semantik im Lexikon (pp.129–160). Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Boas, H. C., Sag, I. A., & Kay, P.
    (2012) Introducing Sign-based Construction Grammar. InH. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp.1–30). CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bolton, K.
    (2006) Chinese Englishes: A sociolinguistic history. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Breiman, L.
    (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. 10.1023/A:1010933404324
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bybee, J.
    (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cann, R.
    (1993) Formal semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166317
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166317 [Google Scholar]
  15. Croft, W.
    (2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2012) Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Croissant, Y.
    (2020) Estimation of random utility models in R: The mlogit package. Journal of Statistical Software, 95(11), 1–41. 10.18637/jss.v095.i11
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v095.i11 [Google Scholar]
  18. Debeer, D., & Strobl, C.
    (2020) Conditional permutation importance revisited. Bioinformatics, 21(1), 307.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Deterding, D.
    (2007) Singapore English. Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Diessel, H.
    (2019a) The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671040
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2019b) Usage-based construction grammar. InE. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: A survey of linguistic subfields (pp.50–80). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110626452‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110626452-003 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2020) A dynamic network approach to the study of syntax. Frontiers in Psychology, 111, 1–15. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604853
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604853 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1977) Scenes-and-frames semantics. InA. Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistic structures processing (pp.55–81). North-Holland Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. (1986) Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 121, 95–107. 10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v12i0.1866 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2007) Valency issues in FrameNet. InT. Herbst & K. Götz-Votteler (Eds.), Valency: Theoretical, descriptive and cognitive issues (pp.129–160). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198775.1.129
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198775.1.129 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fillmore, C. J., & Kay, P.
    (1995) Construction Grammar. CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Garside, R., & Smith, N.
    (1997) A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. InR. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus annotation: Linguistic information from computer text corpora (pp.102–121). Longman. 10.4324/9781315841366‑13
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315841366-13 [Google Scholar]
  28. Givón, T.
    (2017) The story of zero. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.204
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.204 [Google Scholar]
  29. Goeman, J. J., & le Cessie, S.
    (2006) A goodness-of-fit test for multinomial logistic regression. Biometrics, 62(4), 980–985. 10.1111/j.1541‑0420.2006.00581.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00581.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. (2001) Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: The role of information structure in argument distribution. Language Sciences, 23(4), 503–524. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(00)00034‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00034-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2005) Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. InJ.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp.17–43). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.3.03gol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.03gol [Google Scholar]
  33. (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (2019) Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Greenbaum, S., & Nelson, G.
    (1996) The International Corpus of English (ICE) Project. World Englishes, 15(1), 3–15. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1996.tb00088.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00088.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Greenwell, B. M.
    (2017a) pdp: An R package for constructing partial dependence plots. The R Journal, 9(1), 421–436. 10.32614/RJ‑2017‑016
     https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-016 [Google Scholar]
  37. Grice, H. P.
    (1975) Logic and conversation. InP. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (pp.41–58). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gries, S. Th.
    (2021) Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction (3rd rev. ed.). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110718256
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110718256 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gupta, A. F.
    (1998) The situation of English in Singapore. InJ. Foley (Ed.), English in new cultural contexts: Reflections from Singapore (pp.127–174). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Harrell Jr., F. E.
    (2023) rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 6.7–0.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Heumann, C., Schomaker, M., & Shalabh
    (2022) Introduction to statistics and data analysis: With exercises, solutions and applications in R (2nd ed.). Springer International. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑11833‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11833-3 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hilpert, M.
    (2013) Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2014) Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Höder, S.
    (2014) Constructing diasystems: Grammatical organisation in bilingual groups. InT. A. Åfarli & B. Mæhlum (Eds.), The sociolinguistics of grammar (pp.137–169). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.154.07hod
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.154.07hod [Google Scholar]
  45. Höder, S., Prentice, J., & Tingsell, S.
    (2021) Additional language acquisition as emerging multilingualism: A Construction Grammar approach. InH. C. Boas & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact 2: Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp.309–337). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.30.10hod
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.30.10hod [Google Scholar]
  46. Hoffmann, T.
    (2014) The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the Dynamic Model. InS. Buschfeld, T. Hoffmann, M. Huber, & A. Kautzsch (Eds.), The evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond (pp.160–180). John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g49.10hof
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.10hof [Google Scholar]
  47. (2021) The cognitive foundation of post-colonial Englishes: Construction Grammar as the cognitive theory for the Dynamic Model. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108909730
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108909730 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2022) Construction Grammar: The structure of English. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139004213
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139004213 [Google Scholar]
  49. Huang, C.-T. J.
    (1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531–574.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R.
    (2021) An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R. Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑0716‑1418‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kirk, J., & Nelson, G.
    (2018) The International Corpus of English project: A progress report. World Englishes, 37(4), 697–716. 10.1111/weng.12350
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12350 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M.
    (2010) Logistic regression: A self-learning text (3rd ed.). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑1742‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1742-3 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lambrecht, K., & Lemoine, K.
    (2005) Definite null objects in (spoken) French: A Construction-Grammar account. InM. Fried & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots (pp.13–55). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.4.03lam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.4.03lam [Google Scholar]
  55. Lange, C., & Leuckert, S.
    (2020) Corpus Linguistics for World Englishes: A guide for research. Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Leech, G., Garside, R., & Bryant, M.
    (1994) The tagging of the British National Corpus. InProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94) (pp.622–628). ICCL. 10.3115/991886.991996
     https://doi.org/10.3115/991886.991996 [Google Scholar]
  57. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, X., Chen, X., & Chen, W.-H.
    (2012) Variation of subject pronominal expression in Mandarin Chinese. Sociolinguistic Studies, 6(1), 91–119. 10.1558/sols.v6i1.91
     https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v6i1.91 [Google Scholar]
  59. Liaw, A., & Wiener, M.
    (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News, 2(3), 18–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Lim, L.
    (2004) Singapore English: A grammatical description. John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g33
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g33 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lyngfelt, B.
    (2012) Re-thinking FNI: On null instantiation and control in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames, 4(1), 1–23. 10.1075/cf.4.1.01lyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.4.1.01lyn [Google Scholar]
  62. Matthews, S., & Yip, V.
    (1994) Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Michaelis, L. A.
    (2012) Making the case for Construction Grammar. InH. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp.31–67). CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Platt, J., & Weber, H.
    (1980) English in Singapore and Malaysia: Status, features, functions. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Pu, M.-M.
    (1997) Zero anaphora and grammatical relations in Mandarin. InT. Givón (Ed.), Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective (pp.281–321). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.35.08pu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.35.08pu [Google Scholar]
  66. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Ritchie, W. C.
    (1986) Second language acquisition research and the study of non-native varieties of English: Some issues in common. World Englishes, 5(1), 15–30. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1986.tb00637.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1986.tb00637.x [Google Scholar]
  69. Ruppenhofer, J.
    (2004) The interaction of valence and information structure [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California, Berkeley.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Ruppenhofer, J., & Michaelis, L. A.
    (2010) A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames, 2(2), 158–184. 10.1075/cf.2.2.02rup
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.2.02rup [Google Scholar]
  71. Sag, I. A.
    (2012) Sign-based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. InH. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp.69–202). CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Schneider, E. W.
    (2003) The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language, 79(2), 233–281. 10.1353/lan.2003.0136
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0136 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2007) Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  74. Schröter, V.
    (2019) Null subjects in Englishes: A comparison of British English and Asian English. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110649260
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110649260 [Google Scholar]
  75. Schröter, V., & Kortmann, B.
    (2016) Pronoun deletion in Hong Kong English and Colloquial Singaporean English. World Englishes, 35(2), 221–241. 10.1111/weng.12192
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12192 [Google Scholar]
  76. Setter, J., Wong, C. S. P., & Chan, B. H.-S.
    (2010) Hong Kong English. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635979
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635979 [Google Scholar]
  77. Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A.-L., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., & Zeileis, A.
    (2008) Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(1), 307. 10.1186/1471‑2105‑9‑307
     https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307 [Google Scholar]
  78. Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G.
    (2009) An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 141, 323–348. 10.1037/a0016973
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016973 [Google Scholar]
  79. Tagliamonte, S. A.
    (2009) Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. To, C. K. S., Stokes, S., Man, Y., & T’sou, B.
    (2012) An analysis of noun definition in Cantonese. Language and Speech, 56(1), 105–124. 10.1177/0023830912440794
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830912440794 [Google Scholar]
  81. Tonelli, S., & Delmonte, R.
    (2011) Desperately seeking implicit arguments in text. InProceedings of the ACL 2011 Workshop on Relational Models of Semantics (pp.54–62). Association for Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Traugott, E., & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  83. Turnbull, C. M.
    (1982) A history of Singapore: 1819–1975 (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Walkden, G.
    (2013) Null subjects in Old English. Language Variation and Change, 25(2), 155–178. 10.1017/S0954394513000070
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394513000070 [Google Scholar]
  85. Walkden, G., & Rusten, K. A.
    (2017) Null subjects in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics, 21(3), 439–473. 10.1017/S1360674316000204
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000204 [Google Scholar]
  86. Wee, L.
    (2014) The evolution of Singlish in late modernity. InS. Buschfeld, T. Hoffmann, M. Huber, & A. Kautzsch (Eds.), The evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond (pp.126–141). John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g49.08wee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.08wee [Google Scholar]
  87. Yip, V., & Matthews, S.
    (2000) Basic Cantonese: A grammar and workbook. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Zoglauer, T.
    (2002) Einführung in die formale Logik für Philosophen (2nd rev. ed.). Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.24007.bus
Loading
Definite null instantiation in English(es)
Constructions and Frames 17, 278 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.24007.bus
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.24007.bus
/content/journals/10.1075/cf.24007.bus
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): argument structure; language contact; machine learning; New Englishes; null instantiation; null subjects; Usage-based Construction Grammar

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error