Situation in grammar or in frames?

References

1. Alley, Th. R
   (1983) Infantile head shape as an elicitor of adult protection. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(4), 411–427.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antonopoulou, E. , & Nikiforidou, K
   (2011) Construction grammar and conventional discourse: a construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2594–2609. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.013 [Google Scholar]
3. Bard, E.C. , & Anderson, A.H
   (1983) The unintelligibility of talk to children. Journal of Child Language, 10(1), 265–292. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900007777
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900007777 [Google Scholar]
4. Bateman, J.A. , Delin, J. , & Henschel, E
   (2007) Mapping the multimodal genres of traditional and electronic newspapers. In T.D. Royce & W. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp.147–172). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Behrens, H
   (2006) The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(1-3), 2–24. doi: 10.1080/01690960400001721
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960400001721 [Google Scholar]
6. Bernstein-Ratner, N
   (1987) The phonology of parent–child speech. In K. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (Eds.), Children’s Language, Vol. 6 (pp. 159–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, D
   (1994) An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 31–56). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Biersack, S. , Kempe, V. , & Knapton, L
   (2005) Fine-tuning speech registers: a comparison of the prosodic features of child-directed and foreigner-directed speech. InInterspeech-2005 (pp. 2401–2404).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brent, M.R. , & Siskind, J.M
   (2001) The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81, B33–B44. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(01)00122‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00122-6 [Google Scholar]
10. Brown, R
    (1977) The place of baby talk in the world of language. In C. Snow & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp.1–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bybee, J
    (2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
12. Cartwright, T.A. , & Brent, M.R
    (1997) Syntactic categorization in early language acquisition: Formalizing the role of distributional analysis. Cognition, 63, 121–170. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(96)00793‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00793-7 [Google Scholar]
13. Clark, E.V
    (1998) Lexical structure and pragmatic directions in acquisition. In M.C. Gruber , D. Higgins , K.S. Olson , & T. Wysocki (Eds.), Chicago linguistic society: Papers from the panels, Vol. 34 (pp.437–446). Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clark, E.V. , & Estigarribia, B
    (2011) Using speech and gesture to inform young children about unfamiliar word meanings. Gesture, 11(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1075/gest.11.1.01cla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.1.01cla [Google Scholar]
15. Conti-Ramsden, G. , & Friel-Patti, S
    (1987) Situational variability in mother-child conversations. In K. Nelson & A. van Kleek (Eds.), Children’s language, Vol. 6 (pp.43–63). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Croft, W
    (2001) Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
17. Cross, T. , Johnson-Morris, J.E. , & Nienhuys, T.G
    (1980) Linguistic feedback and maternal speech: Comparisons of mothers addressing hearing and hearing-impaired children. First Language, 1, 163–189. doi: 10.1177/014272378000100301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/014272378000100301 [Google Scholar]
18. Cross, T.G. , Nienhuys, T.G. , & Kirkman, M
    (1985) Parent–child interaction with receptively disabled children: Some determinants of maternal speech style. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language, Vol. 5 (pp. 247–290). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cruse, D.A
    (2000) Meaning in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. DePaulo, B.M. , & Coleman, L
    (1986) Talking to children, foreigners, and retarded adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 945–959. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.51.5.945
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.945 [Google Scholar]
21. Ferguson, C.A
    (1977) Baby talk as a simplified register. In C.E. Snow & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children. Language input and acquisition (pp.209–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ferguson, C.A
    (2004) Talking to children: A search for universals. In B.C. Lust & C. Foley (Eds.), First language acquisition – The essential readings (pp.176–189). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fernald, A
    (1985) Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development, 8(2), 181–195. doi: 10.1016/S0163‑6383(85)80005‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(85)80005-9 [Google Scholar]
24. Fernald, A
    (1992) Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: an evolutionary perspective. In J.H. Barkow , L. Cosmidess , & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 391–428). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fernald, A. , & Hurtado, N
    (2006) Names in frames: Infants interpret words in sentence frames faster than words in isolation. Developmental Science, 9(3), F33–F40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2006.00482.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00482.x [Google Scholar]
26. Fernald, A. , Marchman, E. , & Weisleder, A
    (2012) SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fernald, A. , & Mazzie, C
    (1991) Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 209–221. doi: 10.1037/0012‑1649.27.2.209
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.209 [Google Scholar]
28. Fernald, A. , & Weisleder, A
    (2011) Early language experience is vital to developing fluency in understanding. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research, Vol. 3 (pp.3–19). New York: Guiltford Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Filipi, A
    (2009) Toddler and parent interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.192
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.192 [Google Scholar]
30. Fillmore, C.J
    (1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech , 280, 20–32.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Fillmore, C.J
    (1982) Frame semantics. InLinguistics in the Morning Calm (pp.111–137). Seoul, Hanshin Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Fillmore, C.J
    (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Fillmore, C.J. , & Atkins, B.T
    (1992) Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of risk and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E.F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts (pp. 75–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fillmore, C.J. , Kay, P. , & O’Connor, M
    (1988) The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. doi: 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
35. Fischer, K
    (2000) From cognitive semantics to lexical pragmatics: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. Berlin, NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110828641
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110828641 [Google Scholar]
36. Fischer, K
    (2006) What computer talk is and isn’t: human-computer conversation as intercultural communication. Saarbrücken: AQ.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Fischer, K
    (2010) Beyond the sentence: Constructions, frames and spoken interaction. Constructions and Frames, 2(2), 185–207. doi: 10.1075/cf.2.2.03fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.2.03fis [Google Scholar]
38. Fischer, K
    (2011) Interpersonal variation in understanding robots as social actors. In Proceedings of HRI’11 ( pp. 53–60). March 6-9th, 2011. Lausanne, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Fischer, K
    (2012) Human tutors intuitively reduce complexity in socially guided embodied grammar learning. Ro-Man 2012, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Fischer, K
    (2015) Conversation, construction grammar, and cognition. Language and Cognition, 7, 563–588. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2015.23
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.23 [Google Scholar]
41. Fischer, K
    . (forthcoming). Designing speech for a recipient: The roles of partner modeling, alignment and feedback in so-called ‘simplified registers’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Fischer, K. , Foth, K. , Rohlfing, K. , & Wrede, B
    (2011) Mindful tutors – linguistic choice and action demonstration in speech to infants and to a simulated robot. Interaction Studies, 12(1), 134–161. doi: 10.1075/is.12.1.06fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/is.12.1.06fis [Google Scholar]
43. Fischer, K. , Lohan, K. , & Foth, K
    (2012) Levels of embodiment. Linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI. In Proceedings of HRI’12 , Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Fischer, K. , Lohan, K.S. , Rohlfing, K. , & Foth, K
    (2014) Partner orientation in asymmetric communication: Evidence from contingent robot response. HRI ’14 Workshop on Humans and Robots in Asymmetric Interactions , March 3rd, 2014, Bielefeld, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
45. French, L. , & Pak, M.K
    (1995) Young children’s play dialogues with mothers and peers. In K.E. Nelson & Z. Réger (Eds.), Children’s language, Vol. 8 (pp.65–101). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Gibson, J.J
    (1977) The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Gleitman, L.R. , Newport, E.L. , & Gleitman, H
    (1984) The current status of the motherese hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 11, 43–79. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900005584
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900005584 [Google Scholar]
48. Goldberg, A.E
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Goldberg, A.E
    (2006) Constructions at work. Oxford/NewYork: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Groom, V. , Takayama, L. , Ochi, P. , & Nass, C
    (2009) I am my robot: The impact of robot-building and robot form on operators. In Proceedings of the Human-Robot Interaction Conference: HRI 2009 (pp.31–36). San Diego, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Haggan, M
    (2002) Self-reports and self-delusion regarding the use of motherese: Implications from Kuwaiti adults. Language Sciences, 24, 17–28. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(00)00044‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00044-9 [Google Scholar]
52. Halliday, M. , & Matthiessen, C
    (2004) Introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Kaplan, P.S. , Bachorowski, J.-A. , & Zarlengo-Strouse, P
    (1999) Child-directed speech produced by mothers with symptoms of depression fails to promote associative learning in four-month old infants. Child Development, 70, 560–570. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8624.00041
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00041 [Google Scholar]
54. Kay, P
    (1995) Construction grammar. In J. Verschueren , J-O. Östman , J. Blommaert , & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 171–177 ). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hop.m.con2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m.con2 [Google Scholar]
55. Kay, P. , & Michaelis, L.A
    (2012) Constructional meaning and compositionality. In C. Maienborn , K. von Heusinger , & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: an international handbook of natural language meaning (pp.2271–2296). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kaye, K
    (1980) Why we don’t talk baby talk to babies. Journal of Child Language, 7, 489–507. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900002804
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002804 [Google Scholar]
57. Kempe, V. , Brooks, P.J. , & Pirott, L
    (2001) How can child-directed speech facilitate the acquisition of morphology?InProceedings of the VIIIth International Congress for the study of child language (pp. 1237–1247).
    [Google Scholar]
58. Kitamura, C. , Thanavishuth, C., Burnham, D. , & Luksaneeyanawin, S
    (2002) Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: Pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and a non-tonal language. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 372–392. doi: 10.1016/S0163‑6383(02)00086‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00086-3 [Google Scholar]
59. Kraljic, T. , Samuel, A.G. , & Brennan, S.E
    (2008) First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science, 19(4), 332–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02090.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02090.x [Google Scholar]
60. Krause, J. , & Hitzenberger, L
    (Eds.) (1992) Computer talk. Hildesheim: Olms Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Küntay, A. , & Slobin, D.I
    (1996) Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition. In D.I. Slobin , J. Gerhardt , A. Kyratzis , & J. Gua (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language. Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Küntay, A. , & Slobin, D.A
    (2001) Discourse behavior of lexical categories in Turkish child-directed speech: nouns vs. verbs. In M. Almgren , A. Barrena , M. Ezeizabarrena , I. Idiazabal , & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition: Proceedings for the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (pp.928–946). Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Laakso, A. , & Smith, L
    (2004) Pronouns predict verb meanings in child-directed speech. In K. Forbus , D. Gentner , & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 767–772). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Lakoff, G
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
65. Langacker, R
    (1988) A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.50.06lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.06lan [Google Scholar]
66. Langacker, R
    (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
67. Lee, D.Y
    (2001) Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology, 5(3), 37–72.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lieven, E.V
    (1978) Conversations between mothers and young children: Individual differences and their possible implication for the study of language learning. In N. Waterson & C.E. Snow (Eds.), The development of communication (pp. 173–187). Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Liu, H.-M. , Feng-Ming, T. , & Kuhl, P.K
    (2009) Age-related changes in acoustic modifications of Mandarin maternal speech to preverbal infants and five-year-old children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Language, 36, 909–922. doi: 10.1017/S030500090800929X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090800929X [Google Scholar]
70. Lohan, K.S
    (2011) A model of contingency detection to spot tutoring behavior and to respond to ostensive cues in human-robot interaction. PhD Thesis, Bielefeld University.
71. Mannle, S. , & Tomasello, M
    (1987) Fathers, siblings, and the bridge hypothesis. In K. Nelson & A. van Kleek (Eds.), Children’s Language, Vol. 6 (pp. 23–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Martin, J.R
    (1992) English text. London: Arnold. doi: 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
73. Matsumoto, Y
    (2010) Interactional frames and grammatical description. Constructions and Frames, 2(2), 135–157. doi: 10.1075/cf.2.2.01mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.2.01mat [Google Scholar]
74. Metta, G. , Natale, L. , Nori, F. , Sandini, G. , Vernon, D. , Fadiga, L. , Von Hofsten, C. , Rosander, K. , Lopes, M. Santos-Victor, J . et al.
    (2010) The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Networks, 23(8), 1125–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.010 [Google Scholar]
75. Mitchell, R.W
    (2001) Americans’ talk to dogs: Similarities and differences with talk to infants. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(2), 183–210. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI34‑2_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI34-2_2 [Google Scholar]
76. Nass, C. , & Moon, Y
    (2000) Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. doi: 10.1111/0022‑4537.00153
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153 [Google Scholar]
77. Nelson, K
    (1973) Structure and strategy in learning to talk [Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38]. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Newman-Norlund, S.E. , Noordzij, M.L. , Newman-Norlund, R.D. , Volman, I.A. , de Ruiter, J.P. , Hagoort, P. , & Toni, I
    (2009) Recipient design in tacit communication. Cognition, 111, 46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.004 [Google Scholar]
79. Newport, E.L. , Gleitman, H. , & Gleitman, L.R
    (1977) Mother, I’d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In C.E. Snow & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children. Language input and acquisition (pp.109–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Nikiforidou, K
    . (2016). ‘Genre knowledge’ in a constructional framework: Lexis, grammar and perspective in the folk tales. In W. Spooren & N. Stukker (eds.) Genre in discourse and cognition. Concepts, models and methods. Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Ninio, A
    (2011) Syntactic development: Its input and output. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565962.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565962.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
82. Nomikou, I. , Lohan, K.S. , & Rohlfing, K
    (2012) Adaptive maternal synchrony: Multimodal practices are tailored to infants’ attention. CEU Conference on Cognitive Development , Budapest, Hungary.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Östman, J.–O
    (2005) Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In J–O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 121–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.3.06ost
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.06ost [Google Scholar]
84. Papousek, M. , Papousek, H. , & Haekel, M
    (1987) Didactic adjustments in fathers’ and mothers’ speech to their three-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 306–319. doi: 10.1007/BF01073274
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073274 [Google Scholar]
85. Pine, J.M
    (1994) The language of primary caregivers. In C. Gallaway & B.J. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 15–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620690.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620690.003 [Google Scholar]
86. Quam, C. , Yuan, J. , & Swingley, D
    (2008) Relating intonational pragmatics to the pitch realizations of highly frequent words in English speech to infants. InProceedings of the CogSci’08 Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Redford, M.A. , Davis, B.L. , & Miikkulainen, R
    (2004) Phonetic variability and prosodic structure in mothers. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 477–498. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2004.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2004.05.001 [Google Scholar]
88. Reeves, B. , & Nass, C
    (1996) The media equation. Stanford: CSLI and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Rowe, M.L
    (2008) Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35, 185–205. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008343
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008343 [Google Scholar]
90. Roy, B.C. , Frank, M.C. , & Roy, D
    (2009) Exploring word learning in a high-density longitudinal corpus. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society .
    [Google Scholar]
91. Roy, B.C. , Frank, M.C. , & Roy, D
    (2012) Relating activity contexts to early word learning in dense longitudinal data. InProceedings of the 34th Annual Cognitive Science Conference . Sapporo, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Scheper-Hughes, N
    (1985) Culture, scarcity, and maternal thinking: Maternal detachment and infant survival in a Brazilian shantytown. Ethos, 13(4), 291–317. doi: 10.1525/eth.1985.13.4.02a00010
    https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1985.13.4.02a00010 [Google Scholar]
93. Slobin, D.I
    (1975) On the nature of talk to children. InFoundations of language development: A multi-disciplinary approach, Vol. I (pp. 283–297). New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Snow, C.E
    (1972) Mothers’ speech to children learning language. Child Development, 43, 549–565. doi: 10.2307/1127555
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1127555 [Google Scholar]
95. Snow, C.E
    (1977) Mothers’ speech research: From input to interaction. In C.E. Snow & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children. Language input and acquisition (pp.31–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Snow, C.E
    (1994) Beginning from baby talk: Twenty years of research on input and interaction. In C. Gallaway & B.J. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 3–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620690.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620690.002 [Google Scholar]
97. Snow, C.E
    (1995) Issues in the study of input: Finetuning, universality, individual and developmental differences, and necessary causes. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 180–193). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Snow, C.E. , & Goldfield, B.A
    (1983) Turn the page please: Situation-specific language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 10, 551–569. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900005365
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900005365 [Google Scholar]
99. Soderstrom, M
    (2007) Beyond baby talk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants. Developmental Review, 27, 501–532. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.002 [Google Scholar]
100. Soderstrom,M., Seidl, A. , Kemler Nelson, D.G. , & Jusczyk, P.W
     (2003) The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: evidence from prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 249–267. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00024‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00024-X [Google Scholar]
101. Stern, D.N
     (1977) The first relationship: Infant and mother. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Sylvester-Bradley, B. , & Trevathen, C
     (1978) Baby talk as an adaptation to the infant’s communication. In N. Waterson & C.E. Snow (Eds.), The development of communication (pp. 75–92). Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Trainor, L.J. , & Desjardins, R.N
     (2002) Pitch characteristics of infant-directed speech affect infants’ ability to discriminate vowels. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 335–340. doi: 10.3758/BF03196290
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196290 [Google Scholar]
104. Uther, M. , Knoll, M. , & Burnham, D
     (2007) Do you speak e-ng-l-i-sh ? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech. Speech Communication, 49, 2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003 [Google Scholar]
105. Veneziano, E
     (2001) Displacement and informativeness in child-directed talk. First Language, 21, 323–356. doi: 10.1177/014272370102106306
     https://doi.org/10.1177/014272370102106306 [Google Scholar]
106. Vogt, P. , & Mastin, J.D
     (2013) Rural and urban differences in language socialization and early vocabulary development in Mozambique. In M. Knauff , M. Pauen , N. Sebanz , & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3687–3692). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Walker, K. , & Armstrong, L
     (1995) Do mothers and fathers interact differently with their child or is it the situation which matters?Child: Care, Health and Development, 21(3), 161–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2214.1995.tb00747.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.1995.tb00747.x [Google Scholar]
108. Yont, K.M. , Snow, C.E. , & Vernon-Feagans, L
     (2003) The role of context in mother-child interactions: an analysis of communicative intents expressed during toy play and book reading with 12-month-olds. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 435–454. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00144‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00144-3 [Google Scholar]
109. Zoeppritz, M
     (1985) Computer talk?Technical Report TN 85.05, IBM Heidelberg Scientific Center.
     [Google Scholar]