Partnership between grammatical construction and interactional frame

References

1. Antonopoulou, E. , & Nikiforidou, K
   (2011) Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2594–2609. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.013 [Google Scholar]
2. Bakhtin, M
   (1986) Speech genres and other late essays. Second Printing Edition. Trans. Vern W. McGee . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Croft, W
   (2001) Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Devitt, A.J
   (1993) Generalizing about genre: New conceptions of an old concept. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 573–586. doi: 10.2307/358391
   https://doi.org/10.2307/358391 [Google Scholar]
5. Emigh, W. , & Herring, S.C
   (2005) Collaborative authoring on the web: A genre analysis of online encyclopedias. Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Hawai’i International Conference on System Science (HICSS-38). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2005.149
   https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.149 [Google Scholar]
6. Evans, N
   (2007) Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fairclough, N
   (2013) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fillmore, C.J
   (1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–138). Seoul: Hanshin Pub.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fillmore, C.J
   (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fillmore, C.J
    (2006) Frame semantics. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition (pp. 613–620). Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00424‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00424-7 [Google Scholar]
11. Fillmore, C.J
    (2008) The merging of “frames”. In R. Rossini Favretti (Ed.), Frames, corpora, and knowledge representation (pp. 1–12). Bologna: Bologna University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fischer, K
    (2011) Recipient design, alignment and interaction: The role of the addressee in so-called ‘simplified registers’. Habilitation Thesis, University of Bremen.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fox, B.A. , & Thompson, S.A
    (1990) A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66, 297–316. doi: 10.2307/414888
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414888 [Google Scholar]
14. Fried, M
    (2009) Representing contextual factors in language change. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 63–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.9.04fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.9.04fri [Google Scholar]
15. Fried, M. , & Östman, J.-O
    (2005) Construction grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1752–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.013 [Google Scholar]
16. Givón, T
    (1982) Logic vs. pragmatics, with human language as the referee: Toward an empirically visible epistemology. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 81–133. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(82)90026‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(82)90026-1 [Google Scholar]
17. Givón, T
    (1987) Beyond foreground and background. In R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 175–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.11.10giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.10giv [Google Scholar]
18. Goldberg, A.E
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Günthner, S. , & Knoblauch, H
    (1995) Culturally patterned speaking practices: The analysis of communicative genres. Pragmatics, 5(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1075/prag.5.1.03gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.5.1.03gun [Google Scholar]
20. Hopper, P.J
    (1979) Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Horie, K
    . (n.d.). The attributive-final distinction and the manifestation of “main clause phenomena” in Japanese and Korean NMCs. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Horie, K. , Kim, J. , & Rhee, S
    (2012) Stand-alone nominalizations in Japanese and Korean: Parallelism and divergences. Paper presented at the workshop on Epistemicity, evidentiality and attitudes in Asian Languages , Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Iwasaki, S
    (2015) A multiple-grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(2), 161–210. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0101 [Google Scholar]
24. Lambrecht, K
    (1988) Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 135–179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.08lam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.08lam [Google Scholar]
25. Lambrecht, K
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form: A theory of topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
26. Levinson, S.C
    (1979) Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17, 356–399. doi: 10.1515/ling.1979.17.5‑6.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365 [Google Scholar]
27. Matsumoto, Y
    (1988) Semantics and pragmatics of noun‑modifying constructions in Japanese. In S. Axmaker , A. Jaisser , & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 166–175). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Matsumoto, Y
    (1991) Is it really a topic that is relativized? Arguments from Japanese. In L.M. Dobrin , L. Nichols , & R.M. Rodriguez (Eds.), Papers from the 27th regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society, Part One: The general session, (pp.388–402). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Matsumoto, Y
    (1997) Noun-modifying constructions in Japanese: A frame semantic approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.35 [Google Scholar]
30. Matsumoto, Y
    (2008) Variations in Japanese honorification – deviations or a change in the making?In J. Leino (Ed.), Constructional re-organization (Constructional Approaches to Language Series 5) (pp. 89–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.5.05mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.5.05mat [Google Scholar]
31. Matsumoto, Y
    (2010) Interactional frames and grammatical descriptions: The case of Japanese noun-modifying constructions. Constructions and Frames, 2(2), 136–157. doi: 10.1075/cf.2.2.01mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.2.01mat [Google Scholar]
32. Matsumoto, Y
    (2015) Japanese relative clauses that stand alone. In M. Giriko , N. Nagaya , A. Takemura , & T. Vance (Eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 22. (pp. 215–230). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nikiforidou, K
    (2010a) Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past + now . Language and Literature, 19(3), 265–284. doi: 10.1177/0963947010370253
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947010370253 [Google Scholar]
34. Nikiforidou, K
    (2010b) Discoursal categories and grammatical description: A constructional integration. Plenary presented at the ICCG6 , Prague, September 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Okamoto, S
    (1995) Pragmaticization of meaning in some sentence-final particles in Japanese. In M. Shibatani & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays in semantics and pragmatics in honor of Charles J. Fillmore (pp. 219–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.32.12oka
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.32.12oka [Google Scholar]
36. Östman, J. –O
    (2005) Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In J.–O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 121–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.3.06ost
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.06ost [Google Scholar]
37. Ruppenhofer, J. , & Michaelis, L
    (2010) A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames, 2(2), 158–184. doi: 10.1075/cf.2.2.02rup
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.2.02rup [Google Scholar]
38. Selinker, L
    (1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–241. doi: 10.1515/iral.1972.10.1‑4.209
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209 [Google Scholar]
39. Swales, J.M
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Teramura, H
    (1984) Nihongo no shintakusu to imi II [Japanese syntax and meaning II]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Thompson, S.A
    (1971) The deep structure of relative clauses. In C.J. Fillmore & D.T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp.79–96). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Traugott, E.C
    (2011) Pragmatics and language change. In A. Keith & K. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 549–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Tsubomoto, A
    (2009) Sonzai no rensa to bubun/zentai no sukīmā: “Uchi” to “soto” no aida [Chaining of existence and part/whole schema]. In A. Tsubomoto , N. Hayase , & N. Wada (Eds.), “Uchi” to “soto” no gen- gogaku [Linguistics of “inside” and “outside”] (pp. 299–351). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tsunoda, T
    (2011) Ningyo kōbun: Nihongo kara ippan gengo-gaku e no kōken [Mer- maid constructions: Contributions from Japanese linguistics to general linguistics]. NINJAL Research Papers, 1, 53–75.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hashida, Sugako
    (1984) Tonari no Shibafu [The lawn next door]. Tokyo: Nihon Hoso Shuppan Kyokai.
    [Google Scholar]