Change in modal meanings

References

1. Arppe, A. , & Järvikivi, J
   (2007) Every method counts - Combining corpus-based and experimental evidence in the study of synonymy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 3(2), 131–159. 10.1515/CLLT.2007.009
   https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2007.009 [Google Scholar]
2. Arppe, A. , Gilquin, G. , Glynn, D. , Hilpert, M. , & Zeschel, A
   (2010) Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5(2), 1–27. doi: 10.3366/cor.2010.0001
   https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0001 [Google Scholar]
3. Bergs, A
   (2010) Expression of futurity in contemporary English: A construction grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 217–238. doi: 10.1017/S1360674310000067
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000067 [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, D
   (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
5. Boogaart, R
   (2009) Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp.213–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.9.09boo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.9.09boo [Google Scholar]
6. Brezina, V. , McEnery, T. , & Wattam, S
   (2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre [Google Scholar]
7. Bybee, J
   (2010) Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
8. Bybee, J. , & Fleischman, S
   (1995) Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.32
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32 [Google Scholar]
9. Bybee, J. , & Pagliuca, W
   (1987) The development of future meaning. In A. Giacalone Ramat , O. Carruba , & G. Bernini (Eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp.109–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.48.09byb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.09byb [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, J. , Pagliuca, W. , & Perkins, R.D
    (1991) Back to the future. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. II1 (pp.17–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb [Google Scholar]
11. Church, K. , & Hanks, P
    (1989) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Association of Computational Linguistics , Vancouver, British Columbia (pp.76–83).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Coates, J
    (1983) The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Davies, M
    (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/coca.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Davies, M
    (2010) The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400+ million words, 1810-2009. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/coha.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Diessel, H
    (2011) Review article of ‘Language, usage and cognition’ by Joan Bybee. Language, 87(4), 830–844. doi: 10.1353/lan.2011.0082
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0082 [Google Scholar]
16. Fillmore, C. , Kay, P. , & O’Connor, M.C
    (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 641, 501–38. doi: 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
17. Fischer, O
    (2007) Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Goldberg, A.E
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Godlberg, A.E
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goldberg, A.E. , & van der Auwera, J
    (2012) This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica, 46(1), 109–132. doi: 10.1515/flin.2012.4
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.4 [Google Scholar]
21. Gries, S. Th. , & Stefanowitsch, A
    (2004a) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
22. Gries, S. Th. , & Stefanowitsch, A
    (2004b) Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp.225–236). Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hilpert, M
    (2008) Germanic future constructions. A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.7 [Google Scholar]
24. Hilpert, M
    (2011) Dynamic visualizations of language change: Motion charts on the basis of bivariate and multivariate data from diachronic corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(4), 435–461. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.16.4.01hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.4.01hil [Google Scholar]
25. Hilpert, M
    (2013a) Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
26. Hilpert, M
    (2013b) Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik421, 67–82.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hilpert, M
    (2014) Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kay, P. , & Fillmore, C.J
    (1999) Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33. doi: 10.2307/417472
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417472 [Google Scholar]
29. Langacker, R.W
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Millar, N
    (2009) Modal verbs in TIME. Frequency changes 1923-2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 191–220. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.14.2.03mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.03mil [Google Scholar]
31. Plank, F
    (1984) The modals story retold. Studies in Language, 8(3), 305–364. doi: 10.1075/sl.8.3.02pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.8.3.02pla [Google Scholar]
32. Sagi, E. , Kaufmann, S. , & Clark, B
    (2011) Tracing semantic change with latent semantic analysis. In J. Robynson & K. Allan (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp.161–183). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110252903.161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252903.161 [Google Scholar]
33. Stefanowitsch, A. , & Gries, S. Th
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–43. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
34. Taylor, J.R
    (2012) The Mental corpus. How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
35. Tomasello, M
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Traugott, E.C
    (1989) On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 57(1), 33–65.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Turney, P.D. , & Pantel, P
    (2010) From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 371, 141–188. 10.1613/jair.2934
    https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2934 [Google Scholar]
38. Visser, F. Th
    (1969) An historical syntax of the English language. Part 3. First half. Syntactical units with two verbs.Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wheeler, E.S
    (2005) Multidimensional scaling for linguistics. In R. Koehler , G. Altmann , & R.G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative linguistics. An international handbook (pp.548–553). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]