Response to Hilpert

References

1. Boogaart, R
   (2014) Modal versus temporal readings of auxiliaries: A constructionist view. Paper presented at the workshop Modal meaning and Construction Grammar. Third Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE) , University of Zürich, 24-27 August 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cappelle, B. , & Grabar, N
   (2016). Towards an n-grammar of English. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp.271–302). Berlin: De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Davies, M
   (2004) BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). corpus.byu.edu/bnc/.
4. Davies, M
   (2008) The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Davies, M
   (2010) The corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810-2009. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/coha/.
   [Google Scholar]
6. De Haan, F
   (2012) The relevance of constructions for the interpretation of modal meaning: The case of must . English Studies, 93(6), 700–728. doi: 10.1080/0013838X.2012.700587
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2012.700587 [Google Scholar]
7. Firth, J.R
   (1957) Papers in linguistics1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Forsberg, M. , Johansson, R. , Bäckström, L. , Borin, L. , Lyngfelt, B. , Olofsson, J. , & Prentice, J
   (2014) From construction candidates to constructicon entries. An experiment using semi-automatic methods for identifying constructions in corpora. Constructions and Frames, 6(1), 114–135. doi: 10.1075/cf.6.1.07for
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.6.1.07for [Google Scholar]
9. Fraser, B
   (1975) Hedged performatives. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3 (pp.187–210). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gries, S. Th
    (2007) Coll.analysis 3.2a. A script for R to perform collostructional analyses. www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/stgries/teaching/groningen/coll.analysis.r (accessed16 April 2016).
11. Stefanowitsch, A. , & Gries, S. Th
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
12. Traugott, E.C
    (2008) The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp.23–45). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Wärnsby, A
    (2006) (De)coding modality. The case of must, may, måste, and kan (Lund Studies in Linguistics, 113). Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
    [Google Scholar]