1887
Modal Meaning in Construction Grammar
  • ISSN 1876-1933
  • E-ISSN: 1876-1941

There is no abstract available for this article.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.81
2016-09-26
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boogaart, R
    (2014) Modal versus temporal readings of auxiliaries: A constructionist view. Paper presented at the workshop Modal meaning and Construction Grammar. Third Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE) , University of Zürich, 24-27 August 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cappelle, B. , & Grabar, N
    (2016). Towards an n-grammar of English. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp.271–302). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies, M
    (2004) BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). corpus.byu.edu/bnc/.
  4. (2008) The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2010) The corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810-2009. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/coha/.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Haan, F
    (2012) The relevance of constructions for the interpretation of modal meaning: The case of must . English Studies, 93(6), 700–728. doi: 10.1080/0013838X.2012.700587
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2012.700587 [Google Scholar]
  7. Firth, J.R
    (1957) Papers in linguistics1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Forsberg, M. , Johansson, R. , Bäckström, L. , Borin, L. , Lyngfelt, B. , Olofsson, J. , & Prentice, J
    (2014) From construction candidates to constructicon entries. An experiment using semi-automatic methods for identifying constructions in corpora. Constructions and Frames, 6(1), 114–135. doi: 10.1075/cf.6.1.07for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.6.1.07for [Google Scholar]
  9. Fraser, B
    (1975) Hedged performatives. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3 (pp.187–210). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gries, S. Th
    (2007) Coll.analysis 3.2a. A script for R to perform collostructional analyses. www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/stgries/teaching/groningen/coll.analysis.r (accessed16 April 2016).
  11. Stefanowitsch, A. , & Gries, S. Th
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  12. Traugott, E.C
    (2008) The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp.23–45). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wärnsby, A
    (2006) (De)coding modality. The case of must, may, måste, and kan (Lund Studies in Linguistics, 113). Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cf.8.1.81
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error