1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Interrogative pronouns such as in English, in Mandarin Chinese, and in Korean all have developed extended uses beyond interrogation. Such uses may include filling a gap in conversation, softening a speaker’s epistemic stance, and indicating strong emotions such as surprises or incredulity. Yet there is little research dealing with crosslinguistic patterns with large corpora of interactive discourse data. In this paper, we investigate the extended uses based on corpora of multiple telephone calls from the three languages. We show that eight categories of extended use can be identified in the corpora and that most of the extended uses tend to fall in the negative territory. We provide a pragmatic interactive account for this phenomenon and hope that the taxonomy and coding scheme developed here can serve as a starting point for future crosslinguistic and corpus-based comparative studies of -like tokens as well as of the discourse pragmatic uses of other interrogative forms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.00001.lee
2018-01-26
2019-08-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biq, Yung-O.
    1990 Question words as hedges in conversational Chinese: A Q and R exercise. In Lawrence B. Bouton and Yamuna Kachru eds., Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Seriesvol.1, 141–157. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blake, Norman F.
    1992Why and what in Shakespeare. In Toshiyuki Takamiya and Richard Beadle , eds., Chaucer to Shakespeare: Essays in Honour of Shinsuke Ando, 179–93. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinton, Laurel. J.
    1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551789 [Google Scholar]
  5. Canavan, Alexandra and George Zipperlen
    1996aCALLFRIEND Mandarin Chinese-Mainland Dialect. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1996bCALLFRIEND Korean. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cha, Jihyeon
    2010 Interaction of prosody and discourse function: Based on the Korean discourse marker mwe in the sentence-final position. Language Facts and Perspectives25, 227–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Channell, Joanna
    1994Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chao, Yuan Ren
    1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crystal, D. and D. Davy
    1975Advanced Conversational English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ding, Shengshu , Shuxiang Lyu , Rong Li , Dexuan Sun , Xiechu Guan , Qian Fu , Shengzhang Huang , and Zhiwen Chen
    1961Xiandai Hanyu Yufa Jianghua [A referential grammar of modern Chinese], Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dingemanse, M. , Blythe, J. , and Dirksmeyer, T.
    2014 Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in pragmatic typology. Studies in Language38(1), 5–43. doi: 10.1075/sl.38.1.01din
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.1.01din [Google Scholar]
  13. Dingemanse, M. and N. J. Enfield
    2015 Other-initiated repair across languages: towards a typology of conversational structures. Open Linguistics1, 96–118. doi: 10.2478/opli‑2014‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Drew, Paul
    1997 ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69–101. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)89759‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Enfield, N. J.
    2003 The definition of what-d’you-call-it: semantics and pragmatics of recognitional deixis. Journal of Pragmatics35(1), 101–117. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00066‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00066-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Enfield, N. J. , Dingemanse, M. , Baranova, J. , Blythe, J. , Brown, P. , Dirksmeyer, T. , Drew, P. , Floyd, S. , Gipper, S. , Gisladottir, R. S. , Hoymann, G. , Kendrick, K. H. , Levinson, S. C. , Magyari, L. , Manrique, E. , Rossi, G. , San Roque, L. , & Torreira, F.
    2013 Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages. In M. Hayashi , G. Raymond , & J. Sidnell , eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, 343–380. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.26530/OAPEN_630828
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_630828 [Google Scholar]
  17. Godfrey, J. , E. Holliman , and J. McDaniel
    1992 SWITCHBOARD: A telephone speech corpus for research and development. Proc. ICASSP, 517–520.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodwin, Charles
    1979 The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas , ed., Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York, Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayashi, Makoto , Geoffrey Raymond , and Jack Sidnell
    2013 Conversational repair and human understanding: An introduction. In Hayashi, Makoto , Geoffrey Raymond , and Jack Sidnell , eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, 1–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania
    2006The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297337.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297337.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heritage, John
    2012 Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on language and social interaction45(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hsieh, Fuhui
    2005 The use of shenme in interaction, Tatung Journal of General Education, 1, 207–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jefferson, Gail
    1990 List-construction as a task and a resource. In George Psathas , ed.Interaction competence, 63–92. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, Chung-Hyo
    2000Kwuke-ui uimwunsa-wa pwucengsa yenkwu [A study on interrogative and indefinite words in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Pakiceng.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, Kyu-hyun
    1993 Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation as interactional resources. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 3, 3–18. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1999 Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: Types and functions. Discourse and Cognition, 6, 141–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, Myung-Hee
    2005 Kwuke uimwunsa-ui tamhwa pyoci-hwa [Pragmaticalization of interrogative words in Korean]. Tamhwa-wa Inci12(2), 41–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2006 Kwuke uymwunsa ‘mwusun’uy tamhwa pyoci kinung [Discourse functions of wh-word mwusun ]. Tamhwa-wa Inci13(2), 21–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Koo, Hyun Jung and Rhee, Seongha
    2013 On an emerging paradigm of sentence-final particles of discontent: A grammaticalization perspective. Language Sciences37, 70–89. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, Jeong-Ae
    2002Kwuke hwayongpyoci-ui yenkwu [Research on pragmatic marker in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Welin.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lerner, G. H.
    1994 Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology13(1), 20–33. doi: 10.1177/0261927X94131002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94131002 [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Audrey Y-H.
    1992 Indefinite what in Mandarin Chinese, Journal of East Asian Linguistics1(2), 125–55. doi: 10.1007/BF00130234
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130234 [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu, Jianming
    1986 Zhoubianxing zhuyuju ji qita [Sentences with inclusive subjects], Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of The Chinese Language] 192(3): 161–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lü, Shuxiang
    1982Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolue [Essentials of Chinese grammar], Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 1985Jindai Hanyu Zhidaici [Modern Chinese pronouns], Shanghai, Xuelin Chubanshe [Academia Press].
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nam, Kilim and Cha, Jihyeon
    2010 Usage patterns and functions of discourse marker mwo . Hangul288, 91–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Overstreet, M.
    1999Whales, Candlelight and Stuff like that: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2005 and stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics37, 1845–64. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.015 [Google Scholar]
  41. Overstreet, M. and G. Yule
    1997 On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics25, 250–258. doi: 10.1177/007542429702500307
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007542429702500307 [Google Scholar]
  42. Quirk, Randolf , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech , and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1997 Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes23.3:499–545. doi: 10.1080/01638539709545001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1986Discourse markers [Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, 5]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Selting, Margret
    1996 Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: the case of so-called "astonished" questions in repair initiation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting , eds., Prosody in conversation : interactional studies, 231–270. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.008 [Google Scholar]
  46. Shao, Jingmin and Xiufeng Zhao
    1989 Shenme fei yiwen yongfa yanjiu [A student on the non-interrogative usage of shenme], Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 1: 26–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sinclair, John
    1991Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1996 The search for units of meaning. Textus: English Studies in Italy9, 75–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Song, Zuoyan and Hongyin Tao
    2009 A unified account of causal clause sequences in Mandarin Chinese and its implications. Studies in Language33(1), 69–102. doi: 10.1075/sl.33.1.04son
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.1.04son [Google Scholar]
  50. Tang, Tingchi
    1981 Guoyu yiwenju de yanjiu [A study on Mandarin Chinese interrogative sentences], Shida Xuebao [The Journal of National Taiwan Normal University] 26:219–277.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tao, Hongyin
    1996Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.5 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2011Working with Spoken Chinese. Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research (CALPER) Publications, Pennsylvania State University. State College, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
    2001Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
  54. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Winfred Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel , eds., Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
  55. 1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language57, 33–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte , and Hubert Cuyckens , eds., Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, Haifeng and Tieli Wang
    2003 Ziran kouyu zhong shenme de huayu fenxi [Discourse analysis to shenme in spoken conversation], Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 2: 21–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhou, Rong
    2007 Yiwen daici shenme ge yongfa zhijian de guanxi xintan [Relations among different uses of interrogative pronoun shenme ], Yuwen Xuekan [Journal of Language and Literature Studies] 14, 120–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhu, Dexi
    1982Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on grammar], Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.00001.lee
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.00001.lee
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): interrogative pronoun , mwe , mwusun , shenme , what , 什么 and 疑问代词
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error