1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines a Chinese indirect speech act conventionally expressed with what I call the . From a constructionist perspective, I posit that the is an indirect speech act construction. Its idiosyncratic form is paired with the function of showing genuine concern and providing advice in the best interest of the hearer. Based on corpus evidence and discourse analysis, I analyze the contextually situated subtypes of this function, including passing judgments, providing suggestions, issuing complaints and mock sarcasms. The use of the contextual subtypes depends on interpersonal factors such as social distance, power difference, and group membership. This study has implications for politeness theories.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.00010.lan
2018-12-13
2019-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arce, Wilfredo F.
    1970 “The Family as a Social Group: An Outline for Inquiry.” Philippine Sociological Review18 (2): 87–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
    1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blakemore, Diane
    2002Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486456
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogardus, Emory S.
    1925 “Measuring Social Distance.” Journal of Applied Sociology9: 299–308.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boxer, Diana
    1993 “Social Distance and Speech Behavior: The Case of Indirect Complaints.” Journal of Pragmatics19 (2): 103–25. doi:  10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90084‑3.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90084-3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” InQuestions and Politeness, ed. byEsther N. Goody, 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chu, Zexiang
    2003 “‘老/小 姓+称谓性指人名词’格式的使用情况考察 [The study of ‘lǎo/xiǎo (老/小) + surname + noun’].” Yuyan Wenzi Yingyong [Applied Linguistics] 3: 29–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, Herbert H., and Dale H. Schunk
    1980 “Polite Responses to Polite Requests.” Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology8: 111–43. 10.1016/0010‑0277(80)90009‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(80)90009-8 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dijk, Teun A. van
    2008Discourse and Power. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑07299‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fraser, Bruce
    1999 “What Are Discourse Markers?”Journal of Pragmatics31 (7): 931–52. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00101‑5.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5 [Google Scholar]
  13. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2006Constructions at Work the Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics14 (2): 237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  16. Hao, Lin
    2009 “语用标记语‘不是我说你’ [The discourse marker ‘Búshi wǒ shuō nǐ’].” Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning], 6: 39–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hilpert, Martin
    2014Construction Grammar and Its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ho, David Yau-Fai, and Chi-Yue Chiu
    1994 “Component Ideas of Individualism, Collectivism, and Social Organization: An Application in the Study of Chinese Culture.” InIndividualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, ed. byŬi-ch’ŏl Kim, C. Kagitcibasi, Harry C. Triandis, S -C. Choi, and G. Yoon, 137–56. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
    2005Dramatized Discourse: The Mandarin Chinese ba-construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.56
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.56 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 “Maternal Affective Input in Mother – child Interaction: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.” Chinese Language and Discourse3 (1): 57–89. doi:  10.1075/cld.3.1.04jin.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.3.1.04jin [Google Scholar]
  21. 2017 “What Are They Good for? A Constructionist Account of Counterfactuals in Ordinary Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics113: 30–52. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.004.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lü, Shuxiang
    1999现代汉语八百词 [Eight Hundred Words of Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Morgan, Jerry L.
    1978 “Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts.” InPragmatics, ed. byP. Cole, 261–80. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda Thornburg
    1998 “A Cognitive Approach to Inferencing in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics30 (6): 755–769. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00028‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00028-9 [Google Scholar]
  25. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  26. Searle, John R.
    1975 “Indirect Speech Acts.” Syntax and Semantics3: 59–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2005 “(Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture1 (1): 95–119. doi:  10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95 [Google Scholar]
  28. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2003 “A Construction-Based Approach to Indirect Speech Acts.” InPragmatics & Beyond New Series, ed. byKlaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg, 113: 105–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:  10.1075/pbns.113.09ste.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.09ste [Google Scholar]
  29. Tang, Xuening, and Zhang, Jinquan
    2016 “元语否定与‘不是我说你’类话语标记的产生机制 [Metalinguistic negation and mechanism of discourse marker ‘Búshi wǒ shuō nǐ’].” Dangdai Xiucixue [Contemporary Rhetoric] 197 (5): 89–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Thornburg, Linda, and Klaus Panther
    1997 “Speech Act Metonymies.” InDiscourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. byW. A. Liebert, G. Redeker, and L. Waugh, 205–19. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.151.14tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.151.14tho [Google Scholar]
  31. Triandis, Harry Charalambos
    1995Individualism & Collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Yue, Yao
    2011 “从‘不是我说你’类话语标记的形成看会话中主观性范畴与语用原则的互动 [The interaction between subjectivity and pragmatic principles in Chinese conversation viewed from the formation of discourse marker: A case study on the phrase ‘Búshi wǒ shuō nǐ’].” Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World] 25 (1): 69–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, Jijia, and Chen, Jun
    2007 “汉语称呼语概念结构的研究 [The study of conceptual structures of Chinese address words].” Yuyan Wenzi Yingyong [Applied Linguistics] 2: 41–49.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.00010.lan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.00010.lan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese , construction , corpus , earnest advice , indirect speech act , politeness , 构式 , 真诚建议 , 礼貌 and 间接言语行为
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error