How the Chinese language encourages the paradigm shift toward discourse in linguistics

References

1. Ai, Ruixi Ressy
   2014 ‘Topic-comment structure, focus movement, and gapping formation’. Linguistic Inquiry. 45:1,125–145. 10.1162/LING_a_00150
   https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00150 [Google Scholar]
2. Akmajian, Adrian, and Ann K. Farmer, Lee Bickmore, Robert A. Demers, and Robert M. Harnish
   eds. 2017 Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. Seventh edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ambridge, Ben and Elena V. M. Lieven
   2011 Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975073
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975073 [Google Scholar]
4. Au, Terry Kit-fong
   1992 ‘Counter-factual reasoning’. InG. R. Semin and K. Fiedler, eds.Language, interaction and social cognition. NY: Sage. 194–213.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Au, Terry Kit-fong
   2006 ‘The relationship between language and cognition’. InPing Li, , eds.281–286.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Beck, David and Donna B. Gerdts
   2017 ‘The contribution of research on the languages of the Americas to the field of linguistics’. International Journal of American Linguistics. 83:1;7–39. 10.1086/689852
   https://doi.org/10.1086/689852 [Google Scholar]
7. Bellos, David
   2011 Is that a fish in your ear? Translation and the meaning of everything. NY: Faber and Faber.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bisang, Walter
   2009 ‘On the evolution of complexity: Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia’ inGeoffrey Sampson, David Gil and Peter Trudgill, eds.Linguistic complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 34–49.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bisang, Walter
   2012 ‘Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking’. Lingua. 122:335–355. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.002 [Google Scholar]
10. Bisang, Walter
    2014 ‘Grammaticalization and contact – hidden complexity in the languages of East and mainland Southeast Asia’. Course on Linguistic complexity, grammaticalization and contact. Indian summer school in Linguistics at N[ational] R[esearch] U[niversity], H[igher] S[chool of] E[conomics]. Moscow. September 3, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bisang, Walter, Wang Luming and Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
    2013 ‘Subjecthood in Chinese: Neurolinguistics meets typology’. InZhuo Jing-Schmidt, ed.Increased empiricism: Recent advances in Chinese linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 23–48. 10.1075/scld.2.02bis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.2.02bis [Google Scholar]
12. Bloom, Alfred
    1981 The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chafe, Wallace
    2002 ‘Searching for meaning in language: A memoir’. Historiographica Linguistica29:246–261. Alsowww.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/chafe/memoir.htm
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968 A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chen, Ping
    2015 ‘Referentiality and definiteness in Chinese’. InWang and Sun, eds.404–413.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chomsky, Noam
    1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chu, Chauncey C.
    1998 A discourse grammar of Mandarin Chinese. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Collins, Randall
    1998 A sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Collins, Randall
    2000 ‘The sociology of philosophies: A precis’. Philosophy of the social sciences. 30:2,157–201. 10.1177/004839310003000201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/004839310003000201 [Google Scholar]
20. Collins, Randall
    2004 Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400851744
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744 [Google Scholar]
21. DéChaine, Rose-Marie and Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson
    2012 Linguistics for dummies. Mississauga, Ontario: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dryer, Matthew S.
    2018 ‘On the order of demonstrative, numeral, adjective and noun’. Language. 94:4,798–833. 10.1353/lan.2018.0054
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0054 [Google Scholar]
23. Erbaugh, Mary S.
    1990 ‘Mandarin oral narratives compared with English: The Pear/Guava stories’. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association. 25:2,21–42.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Erbaugh, Mary S.
    1992 ‘The acquisition of Mandarin’ inDan Isaac Slobin, ed.The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 373–456.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Erbaugh, Mary S.
    ed. 2002 Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing. Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Erbaugh, Mary S.
    2013 ‘Classifier choices in discourse across the seven main Chinese dialects’. InZhuo Jing-Schmidt, ed.Increased empiricism: Recent advances in Chinese linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 101–126. 10.1075/scld.2.05erb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.2.05erb [Google Scholar]
27. Evans, Nicholas, and Stephen C. Levinson
    2009 ‘The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32:5,429–48. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
28. Evans, Vyvyan
    2014 The language myth Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107358300
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107358300 [Google Scholar]
29. Gerdts, Donna B.
    2017 ‘Indigenous linguists: Bringing research into language revitalization’. International Journal of American Linguistics. 83:4,607–617. 10.1086/693763
    https://doi.org/10.1086/693763 [Google Scholar]
30. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1963 ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’. InJoseph H. Greenberg, ed.Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 73–113.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Halliday, M. A. K.
    edited by Jonathan Webster 2005 Studies in Chinese language. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
32. He, Agnes Weiyun
    2015 ‘Chinese as a heritage language’. InWang and Sun, eds.578–589.
    [Google Scholar]
33. He, Agnes Weiyun
    2018 ‘A non-linear view of interactional competence: Speaking Chinese as a heritage language’. InChuanren Ke, ed.The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge. 336–351. 10.4324/9781315670706‑15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315670706-15 [Google Scholar]
34. Herman, Edward S. and Chomsky, Noam
    1988, 2002 Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media, with a new introduction by the authors. NY: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hodge, Bob and Kam Louie
    1998 The politics of Chinese language and culture. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Huang, Chiung-chih
    2006 ‘Child language acquisition of temporality in Mandarin Chinese’ inLi, Tan, Bates, and Tzeng, eds.53–60.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Huang, Chu-Ren and Nianwen Xue
    2015 ‘Modeling word concepts without conventions: Linguistic and computational issues in Chinese word identification’ inWang and Sun, eds.348–361.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Huang, Chu-Ren, Zhuo Jing-Schmidt and Barbara Meisterernst
    eds. 2019 The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315625157
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625157 [Google Scholar]
39. Huang, C. T. James, Y. H. Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson
    eds. 2014 The handbook of Chinese linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley. 10.1002/9781118584552
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584552 [Google Scholar]
40. Huang, Yan
    2014 Pragmatics: Second edition. NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hyman, Larry M.
    2018 ‘What tone teaches us about language’. Language. 94:3;698–709. 10.1353/lan.2018.0040
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0040 [Google Scholar]
42. Jakobson, Roman
    1971 [1959] ‘On linguistic aspects of translations’. Selected writings: Volume II. The Hague: Mouton. 260–266.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Jenks, Peter
    2018 ‘Articulated definiteness without articles’. Linguistic Inquiry. 49:3,501–536. 10.1162/ling_a_00280
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00280 [Google Scholar]
44. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
    2017 What are they good for? A constructionist account of counterfactuals in ordinary Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics113,30–52. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.004 [Google Scholar]
45. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo and Xinjia Peng
    2018 ‘Linguistic theories and teaching Chinese as a second language.’ InChuanren Ke, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Second Language Acquisition, 63–81. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315670706‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315670706-4 [Google Scholar]
46. Kaplan, Robert B.
    1966 ‘Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education’. Language Learning16 (1 and 2):1–20. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1966.tb00804.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x [Google Scholar]
47. Ke, Chuanren
    ed. 2018 The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315670706
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315670706 [Google Scholar]
48. Klavans, Judith and Amanda Stent
    2017 ‘Computational linguistics’. Chapter 18 in the e-version ofO’Grady , eds.18(1):18–37.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kuhn, Thomas
    1962 The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Landecker, Heidi
    2014 ‘A Deaf linguist explores Black American Sign Language’. Chronicle of Higher Education. January9 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson
    1976 ‘Subject and topic: A new typology of language’. InCharles N. Li, ed.Subject and topic. NY: Academic Press. 457–489.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Li, Ping
    2006 ‘Modeling language acquisition and representation: connectionist networks’ inLi , eds.320–329. 10.1017/CBO9780511550751.031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550751.031 [Google Scholar]
54. Li, Ping, Li Hai Tan, Elizabeth Bates, and Ovid J. L. Tzeng
    eds. 2006 The Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics. Volume 1: Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511550751
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550751 [Google Scholar]
55. Li, Ping and Yasuhiro Shirai
    2000 The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110800715
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800715 [Google Scholar]
56. Lin, Chien-Jer Charles
    2018 ‘Subject prominence and processing dependencies in prenominal relative clauses: The comprehension of possessive relative clauses and adjunct relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese’. Language. 94:4, 758–797. 10.1353/lan.2018.0053
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0053 [Google Scholar]
57. Lin, Jo-Wang
    2003 ‘Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese’. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 259–311. 10.1023/A:1023665301095
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023665301095 [Google Scholar]
58. Liu, Lisa G.
    1985 ‘Reasoning counterfactually in Chinese: Are there any obstacles?’ Cognition. 21:239–270. 10.1016/0010‑0277(85)90026‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90026-5 [Google Scholar]
59. Liu, Meichun
    2015 ‘Tense and aspect in Mandarin Chinese’ inWang and Sun, eds.274–289.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lu, Xiaofei and Berlin Chen
    (eds.) 2019 Computational and Corpus Linguistic Approaches to Chinese Language Learning. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑13‑3570‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3570-9 [Google Scholar]
61. Matthews, Stephen and Virginia Yip
    2011 Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar: Second Edition. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
62. McWhorter, John H.
    2014 The language hoax: Why the world looks the same in any language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. O’Grady, William, John Archibald, Mark Aronoff, and Janie Rees-Miller
    eds. 2017 Contemporary linguistics: An introduction. Seventh edition. Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martins.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Pan, Yuling
    2000 Politeness in Chinese face-to-face interaction. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Pillsbury, Michael
    2015 The hundred-year marathon: China’s secret strategy to replace America as the global superpower. NY: Henry Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Poibeau, Thierry
    2017 Machine translation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11043.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11043.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
67. Reynolds, Matthew
    2016 Translation: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780198712114.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198712114.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
68. Rowland, Caroline
    2013 Understanding child language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Rumelhart, David E. and McClelland, Jay L.
    1987 ‘Learning the past tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing?’ inBrian MacWhinney, ed.Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 195–248.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Qian, Guanlian 钱冠连
    1997 汉语文化语用学 (Pragmatics in Chinese culture: Speechology in humanistic networks.) Beijing: Qinghua University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Scollon, Ron, Suzanne Wong Scollon, and Rodney F. Jones
    2012 Inter-cultural communication: A discourse approach. Third Edition. Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Scollon, Ron, Suzanne Wong Scollon and Andy Kirkpatrick
    1998 Contrastive discourse in Chinese and English: A critical appraisal. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Shei, Chris
    ed. 2019 Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315213705
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213705 [Google Scholar]
74. Smith, Carlota S.
    1997 The parameter of aspect: 2nd edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5606‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6 [Google Scholar]
75. Smith, Carlota S.
    2003 Modes of discourse: The local structure of texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615108
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615108 [Google Scholar]
76. Smith, Carlota S. and Mary S. Erbaugh
    2005 ‘Temporal interpretation in Mandarin Chinese’. Linguistics. 43:4,713–756. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.713
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.713 [Google Scholar]
77. Tai, James H.-Y. and Jane S. Tsay
    2015 ‘Taiwan Sign Language; History, structure, and adaptation’. InWang and Sun, eds.729–750.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Tang, Gladys
    2015 ‘Hong Kong Sign Language’. InWang and Sun, eds.710–728.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Tao, Hongyin
    ed. 2016 Integrating Chinese linguistic research and language teaching and learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.7 [Google Scholar]
80. Tao, Hongyin
    2017 ‘Spoken Chinese corpora: Construction and sample application in research and language pedagogy’. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan (中國語學)。 264:25–43.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Tardif, Twila
    2015 ‘Early vocabulary learning in Chinese-speaking children’. InWang and Sun, eds.641–653.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Tomasello, Michael
    2003 Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
83. T’sao, Feng Fu
    1979 A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step toward discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
84. T’sou, Benjamin K. and Oi Yee Kwong
    2015 ‘Some basic and salient linguistic features across Chinese speech communities from a corpus linguistics perspective’. InWang and Sun, eds.601–614.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and Randy J. LaPolla
    1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
86. Wang, William S. Y. and Chaofen Sun
    eds. 2015 The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics. NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199856336.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199856336.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
87. Wee, Lian-Hee and Mingxing Li
    2015 ‘Modern Chinese phonology’. InWang and Sun, eds.474–490.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Whaley, Lindsay J.
    1979 Introduction to typology: The unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Xu, Liejiong
    2015 ‘Topic prominence’. InWang and Sun, eds.393–403.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Xu, Yi
    2015 ‘Intonation in Chinese’. InWang and Sun, eds.490–502.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Yang, Chin Long, Peter C. Gordon, and Randall Hendrick
    2006 ‘The comprehension of co-reference in Chinese discourse’. InPing Li , eds.257–267.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Yip, Virginia and Stephen Matthews
    2007 The bilingual child: Early development and language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620744
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620744 [Google Scholar]
93. Young, Linda Wai Ling
    1994 Cross-talk and culture in Sino-American communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519901 [Google Scholar]
94. Zhu, Xiaonong and Wang Caiyu
    2015 ‘Tone’. InWang and Sun, eds.503–515.
    [Google Scholar]