Preference organization in PRC criminal trial interaction

References

1. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Paul Drew
   1979 Order in court. Oxford Socio-Legal Studies. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑04057‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5 [Google Scholar]
2. Chang, Yanrong
   (2004) “Courtroom questioning as a culturally situated persuasive genre of talk.” Discourse & Society, 15(6), 705–722. 10.1177/0957926504046501
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504046501 [Google Scholar]
3. Chen, Jianfu
   2013 Criminal law and criminal procedure law in the People’s Republic of China: Commentary and legislation, trans. bySuiwa Ke. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 10.1163/9789004234451
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004234451 [Google Scholar]
4. Clayman, Steven E.
   2001 “Answers and Evasions.” Language in Society, 30(3): 403–442. 10.1017/S0047404501003037
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501003037 [Google Scholar]
5. Clayman, Steven E.
   2013 “Agency in response: The role of prefatory address terms.” Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 290–302. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.001 [Google Scholar]
6. Comrie, Bernard; Haspelmath, Martin and Bickel, Balthasar
   2008 “The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses.” Retrieved fromhttps://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/pdf/Glossing-Rules.pdf
7. Congressional-Executive Commission on China
   Congressional-Executive Commission on China 2016 “Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China.” Retrieved fromhttps://www.cecc.gov/resources/legal-provisions/criminal-procedure-law-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china
8. Conley, John and William O’Barr
   1990 Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago and London.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Drew, Paul
   1992 “Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape.” InTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Foucault, Michel
    1977 Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Alan Sheridan, trans.New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byG. H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
12. Liao, Meizhen
    2012 “Courtroom discourse in China.” InThe Oxford handbook of language and law, ed. byPeter M. Tiersma and Lawrence M. Solan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Matoesian, Gregory
    2008 “You Might Win the Battle but Lose the War: Multimodal, Interactive, and Extralinguistic Aspects of Witness Resistance.” Journal of English Linguistics, 36(3), 195–219. doi:  10.1177/0075424208321202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424208321202 [Google Scholar]
14. McConville, Mike and S. Choongh
    2011 Criminal justice in China: An empirical inquiry. Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9780857931917
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931917 [Google Scholar]
15. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, eds.57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Stivers, Tanya and Makoto Hayashi
    2010 “Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints.” Language in Society, 39, 1–25. 10.1017/S0047404509990637
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990637 [Google Scholar]
17. 中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法 [Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Xingshi Susong Fa) Amended 2012) Promulgated by the National People’s Congress, March14 2012)] Retrieved fromwww.gov.cn/flfg/2012-03/17/content_2094354.htm
18. 中国庭审公开网 [China Open Trial Proceedings Online (Zhongguo Tingshen Gongkai Wang), Accessed2016 December 6.] Retrieved fromtingshen.court.gov.cn/
19. 最高人民法院工作报告 （2018） [The Supreme People’s Court Work Report (Zuigao Renmin Fayuan Gongzuo Baogao) 2018.] Retrieved fromwww.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-87832.html
20. 北京高级人民法院工作报告 (2018) [Beijing Gaoji Renmin Fayuan Gongzuo Baogao (Beijing Supreme People’s Court Work Report) (2018).] Retrieved fromzhengwu.beijing.gov.cn/jh/t1508582.htm
21. 孟新爱：法庭问话中合作原则违反与信息获取《怀化学院学报》。 2010年10期1–3页[Meng, Xin’ai. 2009. “The violation of the cooperation principle and information access in court questioning.” Journal of Huaihua University, 10: 1–3.]
    [Google Scholar]
22. 廖美珍：中国法庭互动话语对应结构研究。《语言科学》 2003 年9 月第 2 卷第5期(总第6期) 77 一 89 页。 [Liao, Meizhen. 2003. “Research on the structure of exchange in interactive discourse in Chinese courts.” Yuyan Kexue. 2(5): 77–89.]
    [Google Scholar]
23. 廖美珍：中国法庭互动话语formulation现象研究 《外语研究》Foreign Languages Research 2006 年第 2 期总第 96 期 [Liao, Meizhen. 2006. “Research on the phenomenon of formulation in Chinese courtroom interaction.” Foreign Languages Research 96.]
    [Google Scholar]
24. 廖美珍. 答话研究——法庭答话的启示[J]. 修辞学习 2004(05):29–34. [Liao, Meizhen. 2004. “Research on Response: Lesson on Courtroom Response.” Xiuci Xuexi. 5: 29–34.]
    [Google Scholar]
25. 孙亚迪与廖美珍：法庭解述话语现象的生成机制研究。《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2017年04期。 [Sun, Yadi and Meizhen Liao. 2017. “Research on the generation mechanism for the phenomenon of courtroom formulation.” Hubei University Bulletin (Philosophy and Social Sciences Version), 4.]
    [Google Scholar]
26. 张丽萍与金孝柏：刑事法庭上的合作交际研究：法官一被告人庭审会话分析。《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2004 年7月第15卷第3期。 [Zhang, Liping and Xiaobo Jin. 2004. “Research on cooperative exchange in criminal court: courtroom conversation analysis of the judge and defendant.” Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. 15(3) 43–46.]
    [Google Scholar]
27. 张志铭：审判方式改革再思考。《法学研究》 1995 第四期。 [Zhang, Zhiming. 1995. “A Further Thought on the Reform of the Trial Process.” Studies in Law (Faxue Yanjiu) 4: 93–96.]
    [Google Scholar]
28. 高　华：刑事法庭调查中的填表式问句初探《语言教学与研究》 2003 年第4 期37–44页。 [Gao, Hua. 2003. A preliminary exploration of fill-in-the-blank style questions in criminal trial investigation. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu. Vol.4, 37–44.] 10.1258/002367703762226755
    https://doi.org/10.1258/002367703762226755 [Google Scholar]