汉语自然会话转换型回应及其互动功能 [Transformative responses and their interactional functions in Mandarin Chinese conversations]

References

1. 吕明臣
   1989 汉语答句的意义. 首届青年现代汉语（语法）学术讨论会论文集《语法求索》. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社. [Lu, Mingchen 1989 The pragmatics of responses in Chinese. In the 1st Youth Symposium on Modern Chinese (Grammar Section) (ed), Investigating Grammar. Wuhan: Huazhong Normal University Publishing House.]
   [Google Scholar]
2. 吕明臣
   2000 现代汉语应对句的功能. 汉语学习, (6). [Lu, Mingchen 2000 Functions of ‘Coping’ sentences in Modern Chinese. Chinese Language Learning6.]
   [Google Scholar]
3. 谢心阳
   2018 汉语自然口语是非疑问句和特殊疑问句的无标记回应. 世界汉语教学, (3), 372–386. [Xie, Xinyang 2018 Default Responses to Polar Questions and Wh-questions in Chinese Everyday Conversation. Chinese Teaching in the World3, 372–386.]
   [Google Scholar]
4. 齐沪扬
   2011 现代汉语语气成分用法词典. 商务印书馆. [Qi, Huyang 2011 Dictionary on the use of modal particles in modern Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Press.]
   [Google Scholar]
5. 陶红印
   2004 口语研究的若干理论与实践问题. 语言科学, (3), 50–67. [Tao, Hongyin 2004 Fundamentals in Spoken Language Research. Language Sciences3, 50–67.]
   [Google Scholar]
6. 易洪川
   1994 答问时的短话长说. 语文建设, (7). [Yi, Hongchuan 1994 Saying more than needed in responses. Language Planning7.]
   [Google Scholar]
7. 尹世超
   2004a 否定性答句否定的隐显与程度. 汉语学习, (3), 10–14. [Yi, Shicao 2004a The Recessiveness-and-dominance and the Extent of the Negative-responsive Sentences. Chinese Language Learning3, 10–14.]
   [Google Scholar]
8. 尹世超
   2004b 说否定性答句. 中国语文, (1), 30–35. [Yi, Shicao 2004b On Negative Responses. Chinese Language1, 30–35.]
   [Google Scholar]
9. 尹世超
   2008 应答句式说略. 汉语学习, (2), 15–22. [Yi, Shicao 2008 The Response Sentence Patterns of Chinese. Chinese Language Learning2, 15–22.]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Boyd, Elizabeth, and John Heritage
    2006 Taking the history: questioning during comprehensive history-taking. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics20, 151.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Clark, Herbert H.
    2012 Wordless questions, wordless answers. InJan P. De Ruiter (ed.), Questions: formal, functional and interactional perspectives, 81–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139045414.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.006 [Google Scholar]
12. Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
    2002a The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
13. Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
    2002b Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of US Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication52(4), 749–775. doi:  10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02572.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x [Google Scholar]
14. Drake, Veronika
    2015 Indexing Uncertainty: The Case of Turn-Final Or. Research on Language and Social Interaction48(3), 301–318. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2015.1058606
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058606 [Google Scholar]
15. Hayano, Kaoru
    2013 Question design in conversation. InJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 395–414. NYSE: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Heritage, John
    1984 A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. InJ. Maxwell Atkinson (ed.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Heritage, John
    1998 Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in society27(3), 291–334. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500019990
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990 [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, John
    2012a Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1), 1–29. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John
    2012b The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1), 30–52. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
20. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social psychology quarterly68(1), 15–38. doi:  10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
21. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
    2012 Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. InJan P. De Ruiter (ed.), Questions: formal, functional and interactional perspectives, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013 [Google Scholar]
22. Heritage, John and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    2018 Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slsi.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31 [Google Scholar]
23. Lee, Seung Hee
    2013 Response design in conversation. InJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 415–432. NYSE: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2012 Interrogative intimations: On a possible social economics of interrogatives.” InJan P. De Ruiter (ed.), Questions: formal, functional and interactional perspectives, 11–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139045414.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.003 [Google Scholar]
25. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2003 Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American sociological review68(6), 936–967. doi:  10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
26. Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
    1973 Opening up closings. Semiotica8(4), 289–327. doi:  10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
27. Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi
    2010 Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society39(1), 1–25. doi:  10.1017/S0047404509990637
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990637 [Google Scholar]
28. Stivers, Tanya, and Nick J. Enfield
    2010 A coding scheme for question-response sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics42(1), 2620–2626. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002 [Google Scholar]
29. Stivers, Tanya
    2013 Sequence organization. InJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 191–209. NYSE: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2015 Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139381154
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381154 [Google Scholar]