Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study locates as its focus the site for the final item in a sentence-in-progress as a late but systematic opportunity space for co-completing sentences by another speaker, and as a systematic site for brief overlaps. A second speaker may supply a version of the final item as projected by the grammatical structure of the sentence-so-far in given contexts to offer assistance for the searched-for final item upon the current speaker’s displayed delivery trouble, or to show an early recognition of what the current turn is doing and what it takes for its completion in the absence of any display of delivery trouble. The overlap in the first case may be ‘accidental’ when the first speaker is able to produce his/her own final item a moment later, or it may be an ‘achieved’ early start in the second case. The same opportunity space may also be ‘exploited’. Final items proposed by the second speaker may generate a local sequence where its acceptability becomes relevant. Post-overlap responses by the first speaker often show acceptance, sometimes with qualification. We argue that overlapping final-item completion is a result of speakers’ active participation and high involvement, and is motivated by the fundamental baseline of cooperation and collaboration in human social interaction.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Goodwin, Charles
    1984 “Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 225–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hayashi, Makoto
    1999 “Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation.” Human Studies22: 475–99. doi:  10.1023/A:1005492027060
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060 [Google Scholar]
  3. Jefferson, Gail
    1986 “Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset.” Human Studies9: 153–83. doi:  10.1007/BF00148125
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148125 [Google Scholar]
  4. Lerner, Gene H.
    1991 “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society20 (3): 441–58. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
  5. 1992 “Assisted Storytelling: Deploying Shared Knowledge as a Practical Matter.” Qualitative Sociology, 15 (3): 247–71. doi:  10.1007/BF00990328
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990328 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2004 “Collaborative Turn Sequences.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, 225–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.12ler
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.12ler [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Xianyin and Shi, Mengkan
    2020 “Collaboration or Resistance: Overlap in Chinese Natural Conversation.” Chinese Linguistics1:51–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Luke, Kang Kwong
    2016 “Storytelling in Multiple Contexts.” Chinese Language and Discourse7 (2): 297–340. doi:  10.1075/cld.7.2.05luk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.7.2.05luk [Google Scholar]
  9. Mandelbaum, Jennifer
    1987 “Couples Sharing Stories”. Communication Quarterly35 (2): 144–70. doi:  10.1080/01463378709369678
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378709369678 [Google Scholar]
  10. Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. doi:  10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2000 “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society29 (1): 1–63. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019 [Google Scholar]
  12. Tomasello, Michael
    2008Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Yue, Yao
    2017 “Reference Recalibration in Mandarin Conversational Talk.” Chinese Teaching in the World1: 36–57. doi:  10.13724/j.cnki.ctiw.2017.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.13724/j.cnki.ctiw.2017.01.003 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error