Collaborative assessments in Mandarin conversation

References

1. Amiridze, Nino, Boyd H. Davis and Margaret Maclagan
   eds. 2010 Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.93
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.93 [Google Scholar]
2. Auer, Peter
   2002 “Projection in interaction and projection in grammar.” InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures33 (December). www.inlist.uni-bayreuth.de/issues/33/Inlist33.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
3. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
   2018 Interactional Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson
   2008 “On Assessing Situations and Events in Conversation: ‘Extraposition’ and Its Relatives.” Discourse Studies10 (4): 443–67. 10.1177/1461445608091882
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608091882 [Google Scholar]
5. Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter
   2017 “Some Uses of Subject-Side Assessments.” Discourse Studies19 (5): 497–514. 10.1177/1461445617715171
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617715171 [Google Scholar]
6. Fang, Di
   2018 “Assessment Formats in Mandarin Conversation.” Paper presented at the3rd International Conference of Interactional Linguistics and Chinese Studies, Beijing, China, August 24–5, 2018
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fang, Mei 方梅
   2017 “Fumian pingjia de guiyuehua” 负面评价的规约化 [On conventionalization of negative assessment expressions]. Zhongguo yuwen中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2 (377): 131–47.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ferrara, Kathleen
   1992 “The Interactional Achievement of a Sentence: Joint Productions in Therapeutic Discourse.” Discourse Process15: 207–28. 10.1080/01638539209544809
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544809 [Google Scholar]
9. Ford, Cecillia E., Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
   2003 “Social Interaction and Grammar.” InThe New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol.2., ed. byMichael Tomasello, 119–44. London: Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goodwin, Charles
    1986 “Between and Within: Alternative Treatments of Continuers and Assessments.” Human Studies9: 205–17. 10.1007/BF00148127
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148127 [Google Scholar]
11. Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” IPrA Papers in Pragmatics1 (1): 1–54. 10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo [Google Scholar]
12. Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byCharles Goodwin and Alessandro Duranti, 147–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Guan, Yue 关越
    2020 “Hanyu kouyu duihua zhong de jufa hezuogongjian yanjiu” 汉语口语对话中的句法合作共建研究 [Research on syntactic co-construction in Mandarin conversation]. PhD diss., Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Guan, Yue 关越 and Mei Fang 方梅
    2020 “Hanyu duihua zhong de jufa gongjian xianxiang chutan” 汉语对话中的句法共建现象初探 [A preliminary study of syntactic collaborative construction in Mandarin conversations]. Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu语言教学与研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 3 (203): 60–9.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hayashi, Makoto
    1999 “Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation.” Human Studies22 (2): 475–99. 10.1023/A:1005492027060
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060 [Google Scholar]
16. Hayashi, Makoto
    2003 Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/sidag.12. 10.1075/sidag.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.12 [Google Scholar]
17. Hayashi, Makoto, and Junko Mori
    2007 “Co-Construction in Japanese Revisited: We Do “Finish Each Other’s Sentences”.” Japanese/Korean Linguistics7: 77–93.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
    2004 “Shared Syntax: The Grammar of Co-Constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics36 (8): 1315–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007 [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John
    2002 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement. InThe Language of Turn and Sequenceed. byCeilia E. Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.),. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Heritage, John
    2013 “Epistemics in Conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 370–94. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch18 [Google Scholar]
21. Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly68 (1): 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
22. Kim, Haeyeon
    2002 “Collaborative Turn Completion in Korean Conversation.” Language Research38 (4): 1281–316.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lerner, Gene H.
    1991 “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society20 (3): 441–58. 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
24. Lerner, Gene H.
    1996 “On the “Semi-Permeable” Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 238–76. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
25. Lerner, Gene H.
    2004a “Collaborative Turn Sequences.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, 225–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.125. 10.1075/pbns.125.12ler
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.12ler [Google Scholar]
26. Lerner, Gene H.
    2004b “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language and Social Interaction37 (2): 151–84. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_3 [Google Scholar]
27. Lerner, Gene H.
    2013 “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn Constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” InConversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. byMakoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, 95–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511757464.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511757464.004 [Google Scholar]
28. Lerner, Gene H., and Tomoyo Takagi
    1999 “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: A Co-Investigation of English and Japanese Grammatical Practices.” Journal of Pragmatics31 (1): 49–75. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00051‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00051-4 [Google Scholar]
29. Li, Xiaoting 李晓婷
    2019a “Duo motai hudong yu Hanyu duo motai hudong yanjiu” 多模态互动与汉语多模态互动研究 [Multimodal interaction and multimodal analysis of Chinese interaction]. Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu语言教学与研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies] 4: 45–59.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Li, Xiaoting
    2019b “Embodied Completion of Assessment in Mandarin Conversation. Paper presented at the16th International Pragmatics Conference, Hong Kong, China, June 9–14, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Local, John, and John Kelly
    1986 Projection and “Silences”: Notes on Phonetic and Conversational Structure. Human Studies9: 185–204. 10.1007/BF00148126
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148126 [Google Scholar]
32. Lv, Shuxiang 吕叔湘
    1980 Xiandai Hanyu ba bai ci现代汉语八百词 [Eight hundred words in contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson
    1996 “What Can Conversation Tell Us About Syntax?” InAlternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, ed. byPhilip W. Davis, 213–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027276315-cilt.102.07ono. 10.1075/cilt.102.07ono
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.102.07ono [Google Scholar]
34. Pomerantz, Anita
    1975 “Second Assessments: A Study of Some Features of Agreements/Disagreements.” PhD diss., Irvine: University of California, Irvine.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pomerantz, Anita
    1978 “Compliment Responses: Notes on the Cooperation of Multiple Constraints”.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 79–112. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
36. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008 [Google Scholar]
37. Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage
    2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren”.” Language in Society35 (5): 677–705. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
38. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Volumes1 & 2. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systemics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
40. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1984 “On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 28–52. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.006 [Google Scholar]
41. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
42. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
43. Stivers, Tanya
    2005 “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction38: 131–58. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1 [Google Scholar]
44. Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2015 Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. London: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139381154
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381154 [Google Scholar]
45. Wiggins, Sally, and Jonathan Potter
    2003 Attitudes and Evaluative Properties: Category vs. Item and Subjective vs. Objective Constructions in Everyday Food Assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology42: 513–31. 10.1348/014466603322595257
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322595257 [Google Scholar]
46. Xian, Lixia 鲜丽霞
    2012 “Hanyu ziran huihua di er pingjia yanjiu” 汉语自然会话第二评价研究 [Study on second assessment in Chinese conversation]. PhD diss., Chengdu: Sichuan University.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Xian, Lixia 鲜丽霞, and Li Lei 雷莉
    2014 “Hanyu ziranhuihua chengzan xingwei dayingyu yanjiu” 汉语自然会话称赞行为应答语研究 [Research on responses to compliment actions in Chinese spontaneous conversation]. Sichuan shifan daxue xuebao (shehui kexueban)四川师范大学学报（社会科学版） [Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition)]. 41 (6): 96–108.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Yue, Yao 乐耀
    2011 “Cong ‘bushi wo shuo ni’ lei huayu biaoji de xingcheng kan huahua zhong zhuguanxing fanchou yu yuyong yuanze de hudong” 从“不是我说你”类话语标记的形成看会话中主观性范畴与语用原则的互动 [The interaction between subjectivity and pragmatic principles in Chinese conversation viewed from the formation of discourse marker: A case study on the phrase ‘bú shi wǒ shuō nǐ’]. Shijie Hanyu jiaoxue世界汉语教学 [Chinese Teaching in the World]. 32 (2): 69–76.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Yue, Yao 乐耀
    2016 “Cong hudong jiaoji de shijiao kan rangbu tonglei yushi pingjia lichang de biaoda” 从互动交际的视角看让步类同语式评价立场的表达 [Stance-taking of the concessive tautology in Mandarin conversation]. Zhongguo yuwen中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1 (370): 58–69.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Zhu, Dexi 朱德熙
    1956 “Xiandai Hanyu xingrongci yanjiu” 现代汉语形容词研究 [Study on adjectives in contemporary Chinese]. Yuyan yanjiu语言研究 [Studies in Language] 1.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Zhu, Dexi 朱德熙
    1982 Yufa jiangyi语法讲义 [Notes on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]