Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Auer, Peter
    1996 “On the Prosody and Syntax of Turn-Continuations.” InProsody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 57–100. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511597862.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Tsuyoshi Ono
    2007 “‘Incrementing’ in Conversation. A Comparison of Practices in English, German and Japanese.” Pragmatics17 (4): 513–52. doi:  10.1075/prag.17.4.02cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.02cou [Google Scholar]
  4. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
    2018Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fang, Mei 方梅
    2012 “Huihua jiegou yu lianci de fuxianyi” 会话结构与连词的浮现义 [Discourse structure and emergent meaning of conjunctions]. Zhongguo yuwen中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 6 (351): 500–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
    1996 “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The ‘TCU’ Revisited.” Pragmatics6 (3): 427–54. doi:  10.1075/prag.6.3.07for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.3.07for [Google Scholar]
  7. Ford, Cecillia E., Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
    2002 “Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments.” InThe Language of Turn and Sequenceed. byCecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 14–38. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1996 “Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational, and Pragmatic Resources for the Management of Turns.” InInteraction and Grammared. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 134–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodwin, Charles
    1981Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Language, Thought, and Culture: Advances in the Study of Cognition. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” IPrA Papers in Pragmatics1 (1): 1–54. doi:  10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01goo [Google Scholar]
  11. 1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byCharles Goodwin and Alessandro Duranti, 147–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Laury, Ritva, and Tsuyoshi Ono
    2014 “The Limits of Grammar: Clause Combining in Finnish and Japanese Conversation.” Pragmatics24 (3): 561–92. doi:  10.1075/prag.24.3.06lau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.06lau [Google Scholar]
  13. Lerner, Gene H.
    1989 “Notes on Overlap Management in Conversation: The Case of Delayed Completion.” Western Journal of Speech Communication53 (2): 167–77. doi:  10.1080/10570318909374298
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374298 [Google Scholar]
  14. 1991 “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society20 (3): 441–58. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
  15. 1996 “On the ‘Semi-Permeable’ Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 238–76. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Luke, Kang Kwong 陆镜光
    2004 “Yanshenju de kuayuyan duibi” 延伸句的跨语言对比 [A cross-linguistic study of incremental sentences]. Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu语言教学与研究 [Language teaching and research] 6: 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Luke, Kang Kwong, and Wei Zhang
    2007 “Retrospective Turn Continuations in Chinese Conversations.” Pragmatics17 (4): 605–36. doi:  10.1075/prag.17.4.04luk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.04luk [Google Scholar]
  18. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. doi:  10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  19. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Selting, Margret
    2000 “The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk.” Language in Society29 (4): 477–517. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500004012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004012 [Google Scholar]
  21. Shen, Jiaxuan 沈家煊
    1989 “Bujia shuoming de huati – Cong ‘duida’ kan ‘huati–shuoming’” 不加说明的话题——从“对答”看“话题—说明” [Topics without comments – Q&A vs. topic-comment]. Zhongguo yuwen中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 5: 326–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tanaka, Hiroko
    1999Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.56
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.56 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error