1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Comparisons of Chinese adverbs and is a long-standing topic in Chinese linguistics. Previous studies tend to mix up different uses of and , often leading to unnecessary confusion. This study focuses on the repetition use of these two adverbs, and demonstrates that in two syntactic environments – sentences with and without quantitative phrases – the nuances between and can both be captured by the hypothesis that “[+increasing]” is more essential for to deliver the repetition reading while “[+similar]” is more essential for to deliver the same reading. Based on conceptual correlations shared cross-linguistically, it is argued that the “[+similar]” feature facilitates the shift from the notion “inverted-sequence” to the notion “repetition” whereas the “[+increasing]” feature serves as an indispensable link between the notion “increment” and the notion “repetition”. Therefore, for the notion “repetition”, it is widely seen that a variety of languages use two devices to code it, one emphasizing the “[+similar]” feature and the other emphasizing the “[+increasing]” feature, and Chinese and is just one of such cases. In this way, the cross-linguistic perspective is proved to offer insights to explorations on language-specific issues as it provides accounts that are deep-rooted in the conceptual level.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.16007.zha
2018-01-26
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cusic, David
    1981 Verbal plurality and aspect. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University.
  2. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jiang, Qi 蔣琪 and Jin Lixin 金立鑫
    1997 “再”與“還”重複義的比較研究 [A comparison of the repetitive zai and hai ].《中國語文》[Zhongguo Yuwen] 3: 187–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jiang, Yubing 江宇冰
    2001 表重複持續的“還、再”比較 [A comparison between hai and zai that denote Repetition and Continuation].《求是學刊》[Seeking Truth] 6: 90–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jing-Schmidt Zhuo and Stefan Th. Gries
    2009 Schematic meaning and pragmatic inference: the Mandarin adverbs hai, you and zai . Corpora4 (1): 33–70. doi: 10.3366/E1749503209000215
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503209000215 [Google Scholar]
  6. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Wendan
    2014 Clause structure and grounding in Chinese written narrative discourse. Chinese Language and Discourse5(2): 99–145. doi: 10.1075/cld.5.2.01li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.5.2.01li [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma, Zhen 馬真
    2000 關於表重複的副詞“又”,“再”,“還” [The repetitive adverbs you, zai, and hai ].《語法研究與探索》[Yufa Yanjiu yu Tansuo] 10: 210–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tovena, Lucia M and Marta Donazzan
    2008 On ways of repeating. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes37: 85–112. doi: 10.4000/rlv.1724
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.1724 [Google Scholar]
  11. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1985 From opposition to iteration: A study in semantic change. Studies in Language9 (2): 231–241. doi: 10.1075/sl.9.2.04clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.9.2.04clo [Google Scholar]
  12. Wan, Quan 完權
    2009 入場理論:認知語法的新進展 [Grounding: A new development in cognitive grammar.《外國語》[Journal of Foreign Languages] 6: 27–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, Shuzhang 楊淑璋
    1985 副詞“還”和“再”的區別 [The distinction between hai and zai ].《語言教學與研究》[Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 3: 56–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yeh, Meng
    1998 On hai in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics2: 237–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, Ying
    2013 A Cross-linguistic study on the notions of increment-supplement in the semantic map approach, the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Bangkok.
  16. 2017 Semantic Map Approach to Universals of Conceptual Correlations: A Study on Multifunctional Repetitive Adverbs, Lingua Sinica, 3: 7. doi: 10.1186/s40655‑017‑0024‑5.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40655-017-0024-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhou, Gang 周剛
    1994 說 “再” [On zai ].《漢語學習》[Chinese Language Learning] 3: 28–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu, Dongping 祝東平
    2010 “再/還”重複義與動詞性詞語的“有界”“無界” [The repetitive sense of zai/hai and the boundedness of verbal phrases].《漢語學習》[Chinese Language Learning] 5: 55–61.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.16007.zha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.16007.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cross-linguistic comparison , grounding , hai , semantic feature , zai , , 設景 , 語義特征 , 跨語言比較 and
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error