oa A corpus-based study of the recurrent lexical bundle ka li kong ‘let (me) tell you’ in Taiwanese Southern Min conversations

References

1. Altenberg, Bengt
   1998 “On the Phraseology of Spoken English: Recurrent Word-Combinations.” InPhraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, ed. by Anthony Paul Cowie , 101–122. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bannard, Colin , and Elena Lieven
   2009 “Repetition and Reuse in Child Language Learning.” InFormulaic language: Vol. 2. Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, Functional Explanations, ed. by R. Corrigan , E. Moravcsik , H. Ouali , and K. Wheatley , 297–321. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.83.04ban
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.83.04ban [Google Scholar]
3. Bannard, Colin , and Danielle Matthews
   2008 “Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning: The Effect of Familiarity on Children’s Repetition of Four-word Combinations.” Psychological Science19: 241–248. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02075.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.x [Google Scholar]
4. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
   1999 “Exploring the Interlanguage of Interlanguage Pragmatics: A Research Agenda for Acquisitional Pragmatics.” Language Learning49: 677–713. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.00105
   https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00105 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, Douglas , and Susan Conrad
   1999 “Lexical Bundles in Conversation and Academic Prose.” InOut of Corpora, ed. by Hilde Hasselgård , and Signe Oksefjell , 181–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, Douglas , Stig Johansson , Geoffrey Leech , Susan Conrad , and Edward Finegan
   1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, Douglas , Susan Conrad , and Viviana Cortes
   2003 “Lexical Bundles in Speech and Writing: An Initial Taxonomy.” InCorpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, ed. by Andrew Wilson , Paul Rayson , and Tony McEnery , 71–92. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, Douglas , Susan Conrad , and Viviana Cortes
   2004 “If You Look at …: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks.” Applied Linguistics25 (3): 371–405. doi:  10.1093/applin/25.3.371
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 [Google Scholar]
9. Biq, Yung-O.
   1991 “The Multiple Uses of the Second Person Singular Pronoun Ni in Conversational Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics16 (4): 307–321. doi: 10.1016/03782166(91)90084B
   https://doi.org/10.1016/03782166(91)90084B [Google Scholar]
10. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana , Juliane House , and Gabriele Kasper
    1989 Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brinton, Laurel J.
    1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
12. Butler, Christopher S.
    1997 “Repeated Word Combinations in Spoken and Written Text: Some Implications for Functional Grammar.” InA Fund of Ideas: Recent Development in Functional Grammar, ed. by Christopher S. Butler , John H. Connolly , Richard A. Gatward , and Roel M. Vismans , 60–77. Amsterdam: IFOTT, University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bybee, Joan
    2007 Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Carter, Ronald , and Michael McCarthy
    2006 Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chafe, Wallace
    1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chang, Miao-Hsia
    2008 “Discourse and Grammaticalization of Contrastive Markers in Taiwanese Southern Min: A Corpus-based Study.” Journal of Pragmatics40: 2114–2149. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.009 [Google Scholar]
17. Chen, Li-jun
    2010 “Huayu Biaoji “Wo Gei Ni Shuo” de Yanbian Guocheng [Grammaticalization of the Discourse Marker “Wo Gei Ni Shuo” in Chinese].” Zhejiang Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue) [Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Social Sciences)] 171: 84–87.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cheng, Robert L. , and Susie S. Cheng
    1977 Taiwan Fujian Hua de Yuyin Jiegou Ji Biaoyin Fa [Phonological Structure and Romanization of Taiwanese Hokkian]. Taipei: Student Book Co.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cheng, Winnie , Chris Greaves , and Martin Warren
    2006 “From N-gram to Skipgram to Congram.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics11 (4): 411–433. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04che [Google Scholar]
20. Chentsova-Dutton, Yulia E. , and Alexandra Vaughn
    2012 “Let Me Tell You What to Do: Cultural Differences in Advice-Giving.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology43 (5): 687–705. doi:  10.1177/0022022111402343
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111402343 [Google Scholar]
21. Clift, Rebecca
    2006 “Indexing Stance Reported Speech as an Interactional Evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics10 (5): 569–595. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00296.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00296.x [Google Scholar]
22. Conrad, Susan , and Douglas Biber
    2004 “The Frequency and Use of Lexical Bundles in Conversation and Academic Prose.” InThe Corpus Approach to Lexicography, ed. by W. Teubert , and M. Mahlberg (Eds. of Thematic Part), Lexicographica: International Annual for Lexicography20: 56–71.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cortes, Viviana
    2004 “Lexical Bundles in Published and Student Disciplinary Writing: Examples from History and Biology.” English for Specific Purposes23: 397–423. doi:  10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
24. Cortes, Viviana , and Eniko Csomay
    2007 “Positioning Lexical Bundles in University Lectures.” InSpoken Corpora in Applied Linguistics, ed. by Mari Carmen Campoy , and Maria Jose Luzon , 57–76. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Cowie, Anthony Paul
    1998 “Introduction.” InPhraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, ed. by Anthony Paul Cowie , 1–20. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Coxhead, Averil , and Pat Byrd
    2007 “Preparing Writing Teachers to Teach the Vocabulary and Grammar of Academic Prose.” Journal of Second Language Writing16: 129–147. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
27. De Smet, Hendrik
    2017 “Entrenchment Effects in Language Change.” InEntrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How we Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid , 75–99. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH. doi:  10.1037/15969‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-005 [Google Scholar]
28. Dong, Xiufang
    2010 “Laiyuan yu Wanzheng Xiaoju de Huayu Biaoji “Wo Gaosu Ni” [A Discourse Marker Derived from Clausal Form: Wo Gao Su Ni].” Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences] 46: 279–286.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Du Bois, John , Stephan Schuetze-Coburn , Susanna Cumming , and Danae Paolino
    1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” InTalking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane Anne Edwards , and Martin D. Lampert , 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ellis, Nick C.
    2012 “Formulaic Language and Second Language Acquisition: Zipf and the Phrasal Teddy Bear.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics32: 17–44. doi:  10.1017/S0267190512000025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000025 [Google Scholar]
31. Erman, Britt , and Beatrice Warren
    2000 “The Idiom Principle and the Open-choice Principle.” Text20: 29–62. doi:  10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29 [Google Scholar]
32. Feng, Bo , and Eran Magen
    2016 “Relationship Closeness Predicts Unsolicited Advice Giving in Supportive Interactions.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships33 (6): 751–767. doi:  10.1177/0265407515592262
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515592262 [Google Scholar]
33. Feng, Hairong
    2015 “Understanding Cultural Variations in Giving Advice among Americans and Chinese.” Communication Research42: 1143–1167. doi:  10.1177/0093650213486668
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213486668 [Google Scholar]
34. Foster, Pauline
    2001 “Rules and Routines: A Consideration of Their Role in the Task-based Language Production of Native and Non-native Speakers.” InResearching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing, ed. by Martin Bygate , Peter Skehan , and Merrill Swain , 75–93. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gan, Min
    2012 “ Zuo Wei Huayu Biaoji de “Wo Gen Ni Shuo ” [ Wo Gen Ni Shuo as a Discourse Marker].” Wenxue Jiaoyu [Literature Education] 2012 (3): 148–50.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Granger, Slviane
    1998 “Prefabricated Patterns in Advanced EFL Writing: Collocations and Formulae.” InPhraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, ed. by Anthony Paul Cowie , 145–160. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Greenbaum, Sidney , and Jan Svartvik
    1990 “The London-Lund Corpus.” InThe London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research (Lund Studies in English 82), ed. by Jan Svartvik , 11–45. Lund: Lund University Press
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hayano, Kaoru
    2011 “Claiming Epistemic Primacy: Y-marked Assessments in Japanese.” InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers , Lorenza Monda , and Jakob Steensig , 58–81. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511921674.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.004 [Google Scholar]
40. Heritage, John
    2002 “ Oh-prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” InThe Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford , Barbara Fox , and Sandra A. Thompson , 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Heritage, John
    2013 “Turn-initial Position and Some of Its Occupants.” Journal of Pragmatics57: 331–337. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025 [Google Scholar]
42. Heritage, John , and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly68 (1): 15–38. doi:  10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
43. Hopper, Paul
    1991 “Dispersed Verbal Predicates in Vernacular Written Narrative.” Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on The Grammar of Event Structure, 402–413. Berkeley: University of California. doi:  10.1075/slcs.36.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.36.04hop [Google Scholar]
44. House, Juliane
    1996 “Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language: Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition18 (2): 225–252. doi:  10.1017/S0272263100014893
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014893 [Google Scholar]
45. Hrisonopulo, Katherine
    2008 “Beyond Reference and Designation: On Interactive Implications of the Pronoun I in English.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics4 (2): 277–292. doi:  10.2478/v10016‑008‑0006‑2
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0006-2 [Google Scholar]
46. Huang, Shuanfan
    1999 “The Emergence of a Grammatical Category Definite Article in Spoken Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics31 (1): 77–94. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00052‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00052-6 [Google Scholar]
47. Huang, Shuanfan
    2013 Chinese Grammar at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/scld.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.1 [Google Scholar]
48. Hyland, Ken
    2008 “As Can Be Seen: Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation.” English for Specific Purposes27: 4–21. doi:  10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
49. Hyland, Ken
    2012 “Bundles in Academic Discourse.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics32: 150–169. doi:  10.1017/S0267190512000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000037 [Google Scholar]
50. Jucker, Andreas H. , and Yael Ziv
    1998 “Discourse Markers: Introduction.” InDiscourse Markers: Description and Theory, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker , and Yael Ziv , 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.57.03juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.03juc [Google Scholar]
51. Kaltenböck, Gunther
    2015 “Processibility.” InCorpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer , and Christoph Rühlemann , 117–142. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.001 [Google Scholar]
52. Kim, YouJin
    2009 “Korean Lexical Bundles in Conversation and Academic Texts.” Corpora4 (2): 135–165. doi:  10.3366/E1749503209000288
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503209000288 [Google Scholar]
53. Labov, William , and David Fanshel
    1977 Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2017 “Entrenchment in Cognitive Grammar.” InEntrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How we Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid , 39–56. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH. doi:  10.1037/15969‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-003 [Google Scholar]
56. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Li, Ing C.
    1999 Utterance-Final Particles in Taiwanese: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Lin, Min-ching
    1996 Discourse Functions of TOH and CHIAH in Taiwanese. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Lindemann, Stephanie , and Anna Mauranen
    2001 “It’s Just Real Messy: The Occurrence and Function of Just in a Corpus of Academic Speech.” English for Specific Purposes20 (Supplement): 459–475. doi:  10.1016/S0889‑4906(01)00026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00026-6 [Google Scholar]
60. Liu, Dilin
    2012 “The Most Frequently-used Multi-word Constructions in Academic Written English: A Multi-corpus Study.” English for Specific Purposes31: 25–35. doi:  10.1016/j.esp.2011.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.07.002 [Google Scholar]
61. Ma, Guanghui
    2009 “Yingyu Zhuanye Xuesheng Eryu Xianshi Xiezuo Zhong de Cikuai Yanjiu [Lexical Bundles in L2 Timed Writing of English Majors.]” Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research] 41 (1): 54–60.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Nattinger, James
    1988 “Some Current Trends in Vocabulary Teaching.” InVocabulary and Language Teaching, ed. by Ronald Carter , and Michael McCarthy , 62–82. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Nesi, Hilary , and Helen Basturkmen
    2006 “Lexical Bundles and Discourse Signalling in Academic Lectures.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics11 (3): 283–304. doi:  10.1075/bct.17.03nes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.17.03nes [Google Scholar]
64. Östman, Jan-Ola
    1981 ‘You Know’ : A Discourse-Functional Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pb.ii.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.ii.7 [Google Scholar]
65. Partington, Alan , and John Morley
    2004 “From Frequency to Ideology: Investigating Word and Cluster/bundle Frequency in Political Debate.” InPractical Applications in Language and Computers – PALC 2003, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk , 179–192. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Pawley, Andrew , and Frances Hodgetts Syder
    1983 “Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Native-like Selection and Native-like Fluency.” InLanguage and Communication, ed. by Jack C. Richards , and Richard W. Schmidt , 191–226. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Polio, Charlene
    2012 “Editor’s Introduction.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics32: vi–vii. doi:  10.1017/S0267190512000116
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000116 [Google Scholar]
68. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage , 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
    [Google Scholar]
69. Quan, Tong , and Yu Guo-dong
    2014 “Zhong Ri “Zhishi Youxian” Pingjia Bijiao Yanjiu – Yi Huayu Biaji “Wo Gen Ni Jiang” han “Yo” Wei Li” [Comparative Study on Epistemic Primacy” in the Chinese and Japanese Language – Case Study of“I’m telling you” and “you”].” Studies in the Philosophy of Science and Technology31(3): 38–44.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech , and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
71. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2016 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Salazar, Danica
    2014 Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing: Applying a Corpus-based Study to Language Teaching (Vol.65). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/scl.65
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.65 [Google Scholar]
73. Scheibman, Joanne
    2002 Point of View and Grammar: Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/sidag.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.11 [Google Scholar]
74. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987 Discourse Markers. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
75. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2017 “A Framework for Understanding Linguistic Entrenchment and Its Psychological Foundations.” InEntrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid , 9–38. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH. doi:  10.1037/15969‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-002 [Google Scholar]
76. Simpson-Vlach, Rita , and Nick C. Ellis
    2010 “An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research.” Applied Linguistics31: 487–512. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp058
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058 [Google Scholar]
77. Sinclair, John
    1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Sorhus, Helen B.
    1977 “To Hear Ourselves – Implications for Teaching English as a Second Language.” English Language Teaching Journal31 (3): 211–221. doi:  10.1093/elt/XXXI.3.211
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/XXXI.3.211 [Google Scholar]
79. Stenström, Anna-Brita
    2004 “What Is Going on between Speakers.” InCorpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partingon , John Morley , and Louann Haarman , 259–283. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Stivers, Tanya , Lorenza Monda , and Jakob Steensig
    2011 “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers , Lorenza Monda , and Jakob Steensig , 3–24. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002 [Google Scholar]
81. Stubbs, Michael
    1983 Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Tao, Hongyin
    2003 “Cong Yuyin Yufa han Huayu Tezheng Kan “Zhidao” Geshi Zai Tanhua Zhong de Yanhua [Phonological, Grammatical, and Discourse Evidence for the Emergence of Zhidao Constructions].” Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Language] 295: 291–302.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Tao, Hongyin
    2015 “Profiling the Mandarin Spoken Vocabulary Based on Corpora.” InOxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. by Chaofen Sun , and William S-Y Wang , 336–347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Taylor, John R.
    2012 The Mental Corpus: How Language Is Represented in the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
85. Thompson, Sandra A. , and Paul Hopper
    2001 “Transitivity, Clause Structure, and Argument Structure: Evidence from Conversation.” InFrequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan Bybee , and Paul Hopper , 27–56. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.45.03tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.03tho [Google Scholar]
86. Thompson, Sandra A. , and Hongyin Tao
    2010 “Conversation, Grammar, and Fixedness: Adjectives in Mandarin Revisited.” Chinese Language and Discourse1 (1): 25–52. doi:  10.1075/cld.1.1.01tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.1.1.01tho [Google Scholar]
87. Traugott, Elizabeth C. , and Richard B. Dasher
    2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Tseng, Chin-chin
    1997 “Taiyu Duanci Yuanze Taolun [Discussion of Taiwanese Word Segmentation Principles].” InTaiyu Wenxue Chubanwu Shouji, Mulu, Xuandu, Bianji Jihua Jiean Baogao [Project Report of the Collecting, Cataloging, and Editing of Taiwanese Literature Publications], 45–72. Taipei: Council for Cultural Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Van Lancker, D.
    1987 “Nonpropositional Speech: Neurolinguistic Studies.” InProgress in the Psychology of Language, VolIII, ed. by Andrew W. Ellis , 49–118, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Wei, Naixing
    2007 “Zhongguo Xuesheng Yingyu Kouyu de Duanyuxue Tezheng Yanjiu – COLSEC Yuliaoku de Cikuai Zhengju Fenxi [Phraseological Characteristics of Chinese Learners’ Spoken English: Evidence of Lexical Chunks from COLSEC.]” Xiandai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages] 30 (3): 281–291.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Whalen, Jack , and Don H. Zimmerman
    1998 “Observations on the Display and Management of Emotion in Naturally Occurring Activities: The Case of “Hysteria” in Calls to 9-1-1.” Social Psychology Quarterly61 (2): 141–159. doi:  10.2307/2787066
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2787066 [Google Scholar]
92. Wray, A.
    2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
93. Wray, A. , and M. R. Perkins
    2000 “The Functions of Formulaic Language: An Integrated Model.” Language and Communication20: 1–28. doi:  10.1016/S0271‑5309(99)00015‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4 [Google Scholar]