1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Mandarin contrasts typologically with English in its lexicalization of state change (Talmy 2000). The majority of Mandarin monomorphemic verbs is moot about or implies a state change, whereas English has many monomorphemic verbs (e.g. ) that entail a state change. This study investigates empirically the nuanced lexicalization of state-change implicature in Mandarin monomorphemic verbs and its implications for the linguistic typology of encoding state change. Two experiments were conducted with adult native Mandarin speakers: a rating task about the acceptability of sentences that expressed a failure of fulfilment of a state-change (e.g. ‘Zhangsan killed a chicken, but it didn’t die’) and a multiple-choice task that probed the preferred interpretation of monomorphemic state-change verbs. The results of both studies reveal a significant effect of verb types and post hoc comparisons show a cline of state-change implicature in the target verbs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.17007.che
2018-12-13
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, Roger W.
    1991 “Developmental sequences: the emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition.” InCrosscurrents in SLA and linguistic theoriesedited byT. Hueber and C. A. Ferguson, 305–324. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowerman, Melissa
    1982 “Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development.” InLanguage acquisition: The state of the art, edited byE. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman, 319–346. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Jidong
    2008a “The acquisition of verb compounding in Mandarin.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Free University of Amsterdam.
  5. 2017 “When transparency doesn’t mean ease: Learning the meaning of resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of Child Language. 44 (3):695–718. doi:  10.1017/S0305000916000192.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000192 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Jidong, and Yasuhiro Shirai
    2010 “The development of aspectual marking in child Mandarin Chinese.” Applied Psycholinguistics31:1–28. doi:  10.1017/S0142716409990257.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990257 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Liang
    2005 “The acquisition and use of motion event expressions in Chinese.” doctoral dissertation, University of Louisiana.
  8. 2007The acquisition and use of motion event expressions in Mandarin Chinese. München, Germany: Lincom GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Liang, and Jiansheng Guo
    2009 “Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language.” Journal of Pragmatics41 (9):1749–1766. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2010 “From language structures to language use: A case from Mandarin motion expression classification.” Chinese Language and Discourse1 (1):31–65. 10.1075/cld.1.1.02che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.1.1.02che [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Q. R.
    2008b Hanyu timao yanjiu de leixingxue shiye [A study on the aspectual system of Mandarin from a typological perspective]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
  12. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and C.-T. James Huang
    1995 “On the argument structure of resultative compounds.” InInhonor of William Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, edited byMatthew Chen and Ovid Tzeng, 187–221. Taipei: Pyramid Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, Eve V.
    1993The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554377
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554377 [Google Scholar]
  14. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Croft, William
    2012Verbs: Aspect and Argument Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dahl, Östen
    1985Tense and aspect systems. New York: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dai, Y. J.
    1997 “Xiandai hanyu shiti xitong yanjiu [A study of aspect in Modern Chinese].” In. Hangzou: Zhejiang Educational Press.
  18. Grice, H. P. L.
    1975 “Logic and conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, edited byP. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander, Richard Goldberg, and Ronald Wilson
    1989 “The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English.” Language65:205–257. 10.2307/415332
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415332 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gu, Yang
    1992 “The syntax of resultative and causative compounds in Chinese.” doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
  21. Krifka, Manfred
    2009 “Implicatures.” InSemantics and pragmatics, edited byUli Sauerland and Kazuko Yatsushiro, 3–15. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2002Concept, image, and symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2008Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Laws, Jacqueline, and Boping Yuan
    2010 Is the core-peripheral distinction for unaccusative verbs cross-linguistically consistent?Chinese Language and Discourse1(2), 220–263. 10.1075/cld.1.2.03law
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.1.2.03law [Google Scholar]
  25. Levin, Beth
    1993English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1995 “The anatomy of a diagnostic: The resultative construction.” InUnaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface, 33–78. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson
    1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Feng-Xiang
    1993 “A diachronic study of V-V compounds in Chinese.” doctoral dissertation, State University of New York
  29. Li, Ya-Fei
    1990 “On V-V compounds in Mandarin.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory8:177–207. 10.1007/BF00208523
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208523 [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, Yuehua, Tao-Chung Yao, Nyan-Ping Bi, Liangyan Ge, and Yaohua Shi
    2008Integrated Chinesee (Simplified Characters): Level Part 1. Boston, MA: Cheng & Tsui Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu, John H.-T.
    1977 “Resultative verb compounds vs. directional verb compounds in Mandarin.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics5 (2):276–313.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ma, Zhen, and Jian-Ming Lu
    1997 “Xingrongci zuo buyu qingkuang kaocha (A study of adjectival complements in Mandarin Chinese).” Hanyu Yanjiu (Chinese Studies)97:3–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P., and Sergel Je. Jaxontov
    1988 “The typology of resultative constructions.” InTypology of Resultative Constructions, edited byVladimir P. Nedjalkov. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.12.06ned
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.06ned [Google Scholar]
  34. Pederson, E.
    2007 “Event realization in Tamil.” InCrosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, edited byMelissa Bowerman and Penelope Brown, 331–355. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pinker, Steven
    1989Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure, Learning, developement, and conceptual change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Shen, Li
    1993 “Guanyu hanyu jieguo fuhe dongci zhong canxiang jiegou de wenti (On the argument structure of Mandarin resultative verb compounds).” Yu Wen Yan Jiu (Chinese Study)48:12–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Slobin, Dan Isaac
    2004 “The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events.” InRelating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, edited byS. Stromqvist and L. Verhoeven, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tai, James Hao-Yi
    1984 “Verbs and times in Mandarin Chinese: Vendler’s four categories.” InPapers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics of the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, edited byDavid Testen, Veena Mishra and Joseph Drogo, 289–296. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2003 “Cognitive relativism: resultative constructions in Chinese.” Language and Linguistics4 (2):302–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Talmy, Leonard
    1985 “Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms.” InLanguage typology and syntactic description, edited byTimothy Shopen, 36–149. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Edited byLeonard Talmy. Vol.II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Thompson, Sandra A.
    1973 “Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: a case for lexical rules.” Language49:361–379. 10.2307/412459
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412459 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tomasello, Michael
    1992First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511527678
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527678 [Google Scholar]
  44. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 “Verbs and times.” The Philosophical Review66 (2):143–160. 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  45. 1967Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Zou, Ke
    1994 “Directional verb compounds in Chinese.” InProceedings of the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, edited byKatharine Beals, Jeannette Denton, Robert Knippen, Lynette Melnar, Hisami Suzuki and Erica Zeinfeld, 443–457. Chicago, IL.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.17007.che
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.17007.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error