1887
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the coordination of talk and gesture in storytelling. The focus is on the different ways iconic gestures may contribute to the organization of TCUs and Turns in an on-going story. It is found that brief gestures produced within single TCUs may make visible situated meanings of deictic expressions, or may even stand in the place of a syntactic slot in constructing a multimodal TCU. Either way, what is depicted through the gestural modality is crucial in bringing out the meaning of a story scene or the high point of a telling. It is also found that gestures may continue across multiple TCUs. Such coordination of verbal and gestural modalities serves to make visible the organization of narration and re-enactment in telling sequences. Recurrent gesture patterns may also coordinate with recurrent narrative patterns in organizing sequenced multiple story events.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.18020.pen
2020-01-15
2020-10-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J.
    (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chui, Kawai
    (2011) Do gestures compensate for the omission of motion expression in speech?Chinese Language and Discourse, 2(2), 153–167. 10.1075/cld.2.2.01chu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.2.2.01chu [Google Scholar]
  3. (2012) Cross-linguistic comparison of representations of motion in language and gesture. Gesture, 12(1), 40–61. 10.1075/gest.12.1.03chu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.1.03chu [Google Scholar]
  4. (2018) Spatial conceptualization of sequence time in language and gesture. Gesture, 17(1), 180–199. 10.1075/gest.00015.chu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.00015.chu [Google Scholar]
  5. Drew, P. & Heritage, J.
    (2006) (Eds.). Conversation Analysis (4volumes). London: Sage Publication Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2007) Gesture with speech and without it. InS. D. Duncan, J. Cassell & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language (pp.31–49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/gs.1.05gol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.1.05gol [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodwin, C.
    (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1986) Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 29–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1992) Context, Activity and Participation. InP. Auer & A. de Luzo (Eds.), The Contextualization of Language (pp.77–99). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.22.07goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.07goo [Google Scholar]
  10. (2018) Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodwin, M. H.
    (1980) Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 303–317. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00024.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00024.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayashi, M.
    (2005) Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica 2005(156), 21–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jefferson, G.
    (1984) On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis (pp.191–222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1978) Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp.219–248). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Keevallik, L.
    (2013) The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(1), 1–21. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753710
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753710 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2014) Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 103–120. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kendon, A.
    (1975) Gesticulation, speech, and the gesture theory of language origins. Sign language studies, (9), 349–373. 10.1353/sls.1975.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1975.0016 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1980) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. InM. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp.207–227). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1988) How gestures can become like words. Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 1, 131–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2016) Gesture and sign: utterance uses of visible bodily action. InK. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistics (pp.33–46). London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lerner, G. H.
    (1991) On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress. Language in Society, 20, 441–458. 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2002) Turn-sharing. InC. E. Ford, B. A. Fox & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp.225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Xiaoting
    (2014a) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 67, 34–60. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2014b) Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.3 [Google Scholar]
  26. Luke, K. K.
    (2016) Storytelling in multiple contexts. Chinese Language & Discourse, 7(2), 297–340. 10.1075/cld.7.2.05luk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.7.2.05luk [Google Scholar]
  27. Luke, K. K. & He, Xiaoling
    (2019) On hand gestures and emergent speakership: A study of turn-competition and gesticulation in Cantonese conversation. InT. Ono & Xiaoting Li (Eds.), Multimodality in Chinese Discourse (pp.99–118). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110462395‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110462395-005 [Google Scholar]
  28. McNeill, D.
    (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological review, 92(3), 350–371. 10.1037/0033‑295X.92.3.350
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350 [Google Scholar]
  29. (1992) Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McNeill, D., & Duncan, S.
    (2000) Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. InD. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Culture (pp.141–161). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mandelbaum, J.
    (1989) Interpersonal Activities in Conversational Storytelling. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(2), 114–126. 10.1080/10570318909374295
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374295 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2010) Concurrent and intervening actions during storytelling in family “ceremonial” dinners, InD. Schiffrin, A. De Fina & A. Nylund, (Eds.), Telling Stories: Language, Narrative, and Social Life (pp.161–172). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mondada, L.
    (2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse studies, 9(2), 194–225. 10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2011) Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 542–552. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2016) Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. 10.1111/josl.1_12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  37. Monzoni, C. & Drew, P.
    (2009) Inter-interactional contexts of story-interventions by non-knowledgeable story recipients in (Italian) multi-person interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 197–218. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J.
    (2012) Facial expression and interactional regulation of emotion. InA. Peräkylä & M. L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in Interaction (pp.64–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A.
    (2009) Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 377–394. 10.1080/08351810903296499
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296499 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sacks, H.
    (1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. InR. Bauman and J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (pp.337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (1995a) Lectures on Conversation, Vol.1. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  42. (1995b) Lectures on Conversation, Vol.2. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.266–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (1997) ‘Narrative Analysis’ Thirty Years Later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 97–106. 10.1075/jnlh.7.11nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.11nar [Google Scholar]
  46. Schegloff, E.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 361–382. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  48. Selting, M.
    (2012) Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 387–415. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2017) The display and management of affectivity in climaxes of amusing stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 111, 1–32. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sidnell, J.
    (2005) Gesture in the pursuit and display of recognition: A Caribbean case study. Semiotica 2005(156), 55–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2006) Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
    (2013) (Eds.). The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Stivers, T.
    (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31–57. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  54. Streeck, J.
    (2009) Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 161–179. 10.1080/01638530902728793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sugita, Y.
    (2012) Minimal affect uptake in a pre-climax position of conversational “scary” stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1273–1289. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  56. Thompson, S. A., & Suzuki, R.
    (2014) Reenactments in conversation: Gaze and recipiency. Discourse Studies, 16(6), 816–846. 10.1177/1461445614546259
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614546259 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.18020.pen
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conversation analysis , coordination , gesture , Mandarin , storytelling , talk , 会话分析 , 协同 , 手势 , 故事叙述 , 普通话 and 话语
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error