1887
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper utilizes the reconstructive nature of translation to examine how formal (neutral and honorific) and plain forms of Japanese are represented in Cantonese dubbing with the aim of exploring some common politeness features of Cantonese that the translator adopts in order to compensate for the difference between the two languages. Address terms that do not exist in the Japanese original, for example deferential terms and kinship terms, are inserted in Cantonese dubbing to represent different speech levels of Japanese. This paper further argues that such inserted address terms help to realize politeness by either recognizing the superior status of addressees or by including an addressee as an in-group member. Some cases of insertions also suggest strategic adoption of address terms in Cantonese. In addition to observing social norms and addressing each other appropriately, Cantonese speakers can also exploit address terms strategically to achieve specific pragmatic goals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.19009.shi
2020-11-24
2021-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bassnett, Susan
    2007 “Culture and Translation.” InA Companion to Translation Studies, ed. byPiotr Kuhiwczak, and Karin Littau. 13–23. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853599583‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599583-003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chor, Winnie
    2018 “Sentence Final Particles as Epistemic Modulators in Cantonese Conversations: A Discourse-Pragmatic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics129: 34–47. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cook, Haruko Minegishi
    1996 “Japanese Language Socialization: Indexing the Modes of Self.” Discourse Process22: 171–197. 10.1080/01638539609544971
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544971 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2005 “Reanalysis of Discernment from a Social Constructivist Perspective: Academic Consultation Sessions in Japanese Universities.” AccessedAugust 1, 2019. nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW42.pdf
  5. 2006 “Japanese Politeness as an Interactional Achievement: Academic Consultation Sessions in Japanese Universities.” Multilingual25: 269–291. 10.1515/MULTI.2006.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.016 [Google Scholar]
  6. Díaz-Cintas, Jorge, and Aline Remael
    2007Audiovisual Translation: Subtitling. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fukuda, Hiroko
    1995T-shirt Japanese Versus Necktie Japanese: Two Levels of Politeness. Translated byCharles De Wolf. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern China.” Journal of Pragmatics14 (2): 234–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  9. Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason
    2000 “Politeness in Screen Translating.” InThe Translation Studies Reader, ed. byLawrence Venuti. 430–445. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Haugh, Michael
    2005 “The Importance of ‘Place’ in Japanese Politeness: Implications for Cross-cultural and Intercultural Analysis.” Intercultural Pragmatics2 (1): 41–68. 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.1.41
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.1.41 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki, and Tsunao Ogino
    1986 “Universals of Linguistic Politeness: Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American English.” Journal of Pragmatics10: 347–371. 10.1016/0378‑2166(86)90006‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(86)90006-8 [Google Scholar]
  12. House, Juliane
    2006 “Text and Context in Translation.” Journal of Pragmatics38: 338–358. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.021 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua8 (2–3): 223–248. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2019 “Politeness and Impoliteness in Chinese Discourse.” InRoutledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis, ed. byChris Shei. 203–215. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315213705‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213705-14 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Sara Mills
    2013 “Rethinking Discernment.” Journal of Politeness Research9 (2): 133–158. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kwok, Helen
    1984Sentence Particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Leung, Wai Mun
    2010On the Synchrony and Diachrony of Sentence-Final Particles. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  19. Luke, Kang Kwong
    1990Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.9 [Google Scholar]
  20. Malmkjær, Kirsten
    2005Linguistics and the Language of Translation. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip
    2011Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Megumi, Maeri
    2002 “The Switching between desu/masu Form and Plain Form: From the Perspective of Turn Construction.” InJapanese/Korean Linguistics (Vol.10), ed. byNoriko Akatsuka, and Susan Strauss. 206–219. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Niyekawa, Mitsue Agnes
    1995Minimum Essential Politeness: A Guide to The Japanese Honorific Language. Tokyo: Kodansha.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Okamoto, Shigeko
    1999 “Situated Politeness: Manipulating Honorific and Non-honorific Expressions in Japanese Conversation.” Pragmatics9: 51–74. 10.1075/prag.9.1.05oka
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.05oka [Google Scholar]
  25. Pan, Yuling
    2000Politeness in Chinese Face-to-face Interaction. Stamford: Ablex Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pizziconi, Barbara
    2003 “Re-examining Politeness, Face and the Japanese Language.” Journal of Pragmatics35: 1471–1506. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00200‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00200-X [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosales Sequeiros, Xosé
    2002 “Interlingual Pragmatic Enrichment in Translation.” Journal of Pragmatics. 34: 1069–1089. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00026‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00026-7 [Google Scholar]
  29. Varela, Frederic C.
    2004 “Synchronization in Dubbing: A Traditional Approach.” InTopics in Audiovisual Translation, ed. byPilar Orero. 36–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/btl.56.07cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.56.07cha [Google Scholar]
  30. Yip, Virginia, and Stephen Matthews
    2017Intermediate Cantonese: A Grammar and Workbook. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315265223
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265223 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.19009.shi
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Cantonese , dubbing , Japanese , politeness , translation , 廣東話 , 日語 , 禮貌 , 翻譯 and 配音
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error