1887
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The study deals with the sociolinguistic phenomenon of codeswitching as manifested in community-based ethnic-language classes. More specifically, it focuses on teachers’ codeswitching from students’ second language (Mandarin Chinese) to students’ first language (English). The empirical study was conducted at one Chinese community school in the United Kingdom to investigate the instances in which teachers switch to students’ first language and to explore teachers’ introspection regarding their codeswitching behavior. Twelve types of codeswitching were identified and categorized in accordance with functions recorded in other studies. Discrepancies between teachers’ beliefs on the choice of language medium and their actual practices were found. Teachers were not always aware of their codeswitching and they generally held positive attitudes towards their conscious codeswitching and negative attitudes towards subconscious codeswitching. Conscious switches were used mainly for pedagogical, interpersonal, and interactive purposes. A sense of guilt was found to be associated with their unconscious codeswitching. This study suggests that raising teachers’ awareness of the potential usefulness of codeswitching within ethnic-language education is paramount.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20005.li
2023-03-30
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adendorff, R.
    1993 “Codeswitching amongst Zulu-speaking teachers and their pupils: its functions and implications for teacher education.” Language and Education7(3): 141–162. 10.1080/09500789309541356
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789309541356 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad, B. H. and K. Jusoff
    2009 “Teachers’ code-switching in classroom instructions for low English proficient learners.” English Language Teaching2(2): 49–55. 10.5539/elt.v2n2p49
    https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n2p49 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allwright, D.
    1988Observation in the language classroom. London, Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson, D.
    1987 “The mother tongue in the classroom: a neglected resource?” ELT Journal41(4): 241–247. 10.1093/elt/41.4.241
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/41.4.241 [Google Scholar]
  5. 1993 “Teaching in the target language: a problem in the current orthodoxy”, Language Learning Journal, No.8, pp.2–5. 10.1080/09571739385200261
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739385200261 [Google Scholar]
  6. Auerbach, E. R.
    1993 “Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom.” TESOL Quarterly27(1): 9–32. 10.2307/3586949
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586949 [Google Scholar]
  7. Canagarajah, S.
    1995 “Functions of codeswitching in ESL classrooms: socialising bilingualism in Jaffna.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development16(3): 173–195. 10.1080/01434632.1995.9994599
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1995.9994599 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2011 “Translanguaging in the classroom: emerging issues for research and pedagogy.” Applied Linguistics Review21: 1–28. 10.1515/9783110239331.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110239331.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2013aTranslingual Practice: Global English and Cosmopolitan Relations. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203120293
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203120293 [Google Scholar]
  10. Canagarajah, A. S.
    (ed.) 2013bLiteracy as Translingual Practice: Between Communities and Classrooms. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203120293
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203120293 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carless, D.
    2008 “Student use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom.” ELT Journal62(4): 331–338. 10.1093/elt/ccm090
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm090 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chambers, F.
    1991 “Promoting use of the target language in the classroom.” Language Learning Journal, 41, pp.27–31. 10.1080/09571739185200411
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739185200411 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chambers, G.
    1992 “Teaching in the target language, Language Learning Journal.” 61, pp.66–67. 10.1080/09571739285200491
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739285200491 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cleghorn, A.
    1992 “Primary level science in Kenya: constructing meaning through English and Indigenous languages.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education5(4): 311–323. 10.1080/0951839920050403
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839920050403 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook, V.
    1991Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2001 “Using the first language in the classroom.” Canadian Modern Language Review57(3): 402–423. 10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402 [Google Scholar]
  17. Creese, A. and P. Martin
    2006 “Interaction in complementary school contexts: developing identities of choice – an introduction.” Language and Education20(1): 1–4. 10.1080/09500780608668706
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780608668706 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cummins, J.
    1991 “Interdependence of first- and second-language proficiency in bilingual children.” Language Processing in Bilingual Childrened. byE. Bislystok, 70–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620652.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620652.006 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dickson, P.
    1992Using the Target Language in Modern Foreign Language Classrooms. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1996Using the target language: A view from the classroom. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Duff, P. A. and C. G. Polio
    1990 “How much foreign language is there in the foreign language classroom?” The Modern Language Journal74(2): 154–166. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1990.tb02561.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb02561.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Edstrom, A.
    2006 “L1 use in the L2 classroom: one teacher’s self-evaluation.” The Canadian Modern Language Review63(2): 275–292. 10.3138/cmlr.63.2.275
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.2.275 [Google Scholar]
  23. Francis, B.,
    2009 “Language as capital, or language as identity? Chinese complementary school pupils’ perspectives on the purposes and benefits of complementary schools.” British Educational Research Journal35(4): 519–138. 10.1080/01411920802044586
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802044586 [Google Scholar]
  24. Franklin, C. E. M.
    1990 “Teaching in the target language.” Language Learning Journal21: 20–24. 10.1080/09571739085200371
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739085200371 [Google Scholar]
  25. García, O.
    2009Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. García, O.,
    2012 “Transgressing monolingualism and bilingual dualities: translanguaging pedagogies”. InHarnessing Linguistic Variation to Improve Education, ed. byA. Yiakoumetti. 45–75. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hagen, S.
    1992 “Language policy and strategy issues in the new Europe” Language Learning Journal51: 31–34. 10.1080/09571739285200111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739285200111 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hall, K. A., Ozerk, K., Zulfiqar, M., and Tan, J. E. C.
    2002 “‘This is our school’: provision, purpose and pedagogy of supplementary schooling in Leeds and Oslo” Br. Educ. Res. J.281: 399–418. 10.1080/01411920220137467
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920220137467 [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliwell, S. and Jones, B.
    1991On target. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Harbord, J.
    1992 “The use of the mother tongue in the classroom.” ELT Journal46(4): 350–355. 10.1093/elt/46.4.350
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.4.350 [Google Scholar]
  31. Heller, M.
    1988 “Introduction.” InCodeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectivesed. byM. Heller, 1–24. Berlin/ New York/ Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110849615.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110849615.1 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hobbs, V.,
    2010 “Code-switching in Japanese language classrooms: an exploratory investigation of native vs. non-native speaker teacher practice.” Linguistics and Education211: 44–59. 10.1016/j.linged.2009.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kagan, O.
    2005 “In support of a proficiency-based definition of heritage language learners: the case of Russian.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism8(2–3): 213–221. 10.1080/13670050508668608
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050508668608 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kang, D.-M.
    2008 “The classroom language use of a Korean elementary school EFL teaching: another look at TETE.” System361: 214–226. 10.1016/j.system.2007.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kempadoo, M. and M. Abdelrazak
    2001Directory of Supplementary and Mother-tongue Classes. London: Resource Unit for Supplementary and Mother-tongue Schools.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Krashen, S. D.
    1987Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. London: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Krashen, S. D. and Terrell, T. D.
    1988The Natural Approach. London: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kraemer, A.
    2006 “Teachers’ use of English in communicative German language classrooms: a qualitative analysis.” Foreign Language Annals39(3): 435–450. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2006.tb02898.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02898.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, F.
    2014 “Ethnic Chinese Students’ Perceptions of Chinese Language Teachers’ Codeswitching in Class.” The Journal of Chinese Sociolinguistics (1):92–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, W.
    1993 “Mother tongue maintenance in a Chinese community school in Newcastle Upon Tyne: developing a social network perspective.” Language and Education7(3): 199–215. 10.1080/09500789309541359
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789309541359 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1994Three Generations, Two Languages, One Family. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2006 “Complementary schools, past, present and future.” Language and Education20(1): 76–83. 10.1080/09500780608668711
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780608668711 [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, W. and P. Martin
    2009 “Conflicts and tensions in classroom codeswitching: an introduction.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism12(2): 117–122. 10.1080/13670050802153111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802153111 [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, W.,
    1992 “A two-step sociolinguistic analysis of code-switching and language choice: the example of a bilingual Chinese community in Britain.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics2(1): 63–86. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.1992.tb00024.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1992.tb00024.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, W. and C.-J. Wu
    2009 “Polite Chinese children revisited: creativity and the use of codeswitching in the Chinese complementary school classroom.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism12(2): 193–211. 10.1080/13670050802153210
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802153210 [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, W.
    2018 “Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language.” Applied Linguistics39(1): 9–30. 10.1093/applin/amx039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lucas, M. W. and A. Yiakoumetti
    2019 “Cross-linguistic awareness-raising practices can enhance written performance in EFL classes in Japanese universities.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism22(8): 958–973. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1325833
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1325833 [Google Scholar]
  48. Macaro, E.
    1995 “Target language use in Italy.” Language Learning Journal111: 52–54. 10.1080/09571739585200171
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739585200171 [Google Scholar]
  49. 1996 Teacher use of the target language (part 1).” Languages Forum1(5): 2–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 1997Target Language, Collaborative Learning and Autonomy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2001 “Analysing student teachers’ codeswitching in foreign language classrooms: theories and decision making.” The Modern Language Journal85(4): 531–548. 10.1111/0026‑7902.00124
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00124 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2003Teaching and Learning a Second Language. London/New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Macdonald, C.
    1993Using the target language. Cheltenham, UK: Mary Glasgow Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Mau, A.,
    2009 “Mapping politics and pedagogy: understanding the population and practices of Chinese complementary schools in England.” Ethnography and Education4(1): 17–36. 10.1080/17457820802703473
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820802703473 [Google Scholar]
  55. Milroy, L. and Muysken, P.
    1995 “Introduction: Codeswitching and Bilingualism Research.” In: One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on codeswitching, ed. byL. Milroy. and P. Muysken, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620867.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620867.001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mitchell, R.
    1988Communicative Language Teaching in Practice. London: CILTR.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Neil, P. S.
    (ed) 1997Reflections on the target language. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Pan, Y.-c. and Y.-C. Pan
    2010 “The use of L1 in the foreign language classroom.” Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal12(2): 87–96. 10.14483/22487085.85
    https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.85 [Google Scholar]
  59. Polio, C. G. and P. A. Duff
    1994 “Teachers’ language use in university foreign language classrooms: a qualitative analysis of English and target language alternation.” The Modern Language Journal78(3): 313–326. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1994.tb02045.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02045.x [Google Scholar]
  60. Probyn, M.
    2009 “‘Smuggling the vernacular into the classroom’: conflicts and tensions in classroom codeswitching in township/rural schools in South Africa.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism12(2): 123–136. 10.1080/13670050802153137
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802153137 [Google Scholar]
  61. Raschka, C.,
    2009 “Conflicts and tensions in codeswitching in a Taiwanese EFL classroom.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism12(2): 157–171. 10.1080/13670050802153152
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802153152 [Google Scholar]
  62. Skinner, D.
    1985 “Access to learning anatomy of the language/ leaning connection.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development6(5): 369–389. 10.1080/01434632.1985.9994212
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1985.9994212 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tien, C.-y.
    2009 “Conflict and accommodation in classroom codeswitching in Taiwan.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism12(2): 173–192. 10.1080/13670050802153160
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802153160 [Google Scholar]
  64. Turnbull, M.
    2001 “There is a role for the L1 in second and foreign language teaching, but …” Canadian Modern Language Review571: 531–540. 10.3138/cmlr.57.4.531
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.4.531 [Google Scholar]
  65. Turnbull, M. and K. Arnett
    2002 “Teachers’ uses of the target and first language in second and foreign language classrooms.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics221: 204–218. 10.1017/S0267190502000119
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000119 [Google Scholar]
  66. Van de Craen, P. and I. Humblet
    1989 “Dialect and education in Belgium.” InDialect and Education: Some European Perspectives, ed. byJ. Cheshire, V. Edwards, H. Munstermann and B. Weltens. Clevedon, 531: 13–29. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Van Lier, L.
    1995 “The use of the L1 in L2 classes.” Babylonia21: 37–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wong, L. Y.-F.
    1992Education of Chinese Children in Britain and the USA. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Yiakoumetti, A.
    2011 “Re-invigorating teacher-training programmes in linguistic variation.” InTeaching Teachers: Approaches in Improving Quality of Education, ed. byI. M. Saleh and M. S. Khine, 195–214. New York: Nova Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 2015 “Language policy and practice in multilingual Britain: perspectives from mainstream and complementary linguistically-diverse classrooms.” InEnglish Language Education in a Global World: Practices, Issues and Challenges, ed. byL. T. Wong and A. Dubey-Jhaveri, 137–146. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 2022 “Teachers’ language use in United Kingdom Chinese community schools: implications for heritage-language education.” Frontiers in Psychology131. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899428
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899428 [Google Scholar]
  72. Yiakoumetti, A. and M. Mina
    2013a “Language choices by teachers in EFL classrooms in Cyprus: bidialectism meets bilingualism with a call for teacher training programmes in linguistic variation.” Teacher Development17(2): 214–227. 10.1080/13664530.2012.753943
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.753943 [Google Scholar]
  73. 2013b “The influence of first-language bidialectism in foreign-language classrooms: observations from Cyprus.” Language, Culture and Curriculum24(3): 287–297. 10.1080/07908318.2011.620126
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2011.620126 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20005.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20005.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error