1887
image of Discretion
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores the functions of Chinese final particle in both TCU-final and non-TCU-final positions in medical advice-giving. Using Praat, we differentiated phonologically marked and unmarked and analyzed their functions in both doctor and patient speech. The findings suggest a difference in participants’ use of : while non-TCU-final occurs mainly in the patient speech to mark newsworthiness and call for the doctor’s attention, TCU-final ou occurs in both the doctor and the patient speech serving various functions. Most importantly, the paper provides a new understanding of the various functions of as interconnected to each other under its intrinsic discreet quality that facilitates relationship building in the selected conversational activity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20010.jin
2021-01-14
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arundale, Robert B.
    2013 “Face as A Research Focus in Interpersonal Pragmatics: Relational and Emic Perspectives.” Journal of Pragmatics58, 108–120. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolden, Galina B.
    2009 “Implementing Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘so’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics41 (5): 974–998. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Briz, Antonio , and Maria Estellés
    2010 “On the Relationship between Attenuation, Discourse Particles and Position.” InNew Approaches to Hedging, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck , Wiltrud Mihatsch , and Stefan Schneider , 289–304. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing. doi:  10.1163/9789004253247_014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253247_014 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1965A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang
    2016Parts of Speech in Mandarin: The State of the Art. Hong Kong: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑0398‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0398-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chor, Winnie
    2018 “Sentence Final Particles as Epistemic Modulators in Cantonese Conversations: A Discourse-Pragmatic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics129: 34–47. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  9. Couture, Shari J. , and Olga Sutherland
    2006 “Giving Advice on Advice-Giving: A Conversation Analysis of Karl Tomm’s Practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy32 (3): 329–344. doi:  10.1111/j.1752‑0606.2006.tb01610.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01610.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Goffman, Erving
    1969Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hakulinen, Auli
    2001 “On Some Uses of the Discourse Particle kyl(lä) in Finnish Conversation.” InStudies in International Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting , and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , 177–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10.09hak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.09hak [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall, Christopher , and Stef Slembrouck
    2014 Advice-Giving. InAnalyzing Social Work Communication: Discourse in Practice, ed. by Christopher Hall , Kirsi Juhila , Maureen Matarese , and Carolus van Nijnatten , 98–116. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hancil, Sylvie , Alexander Haselow , and Margje Post
    (eds) 2015Final Particles. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110375572
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375572 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hepburn, Alexa , and Jonathan Potter
    2011 “Designing the Recipient: Managing Advice Resistance in Institutional Settings.” Social Psychology Quarterly74 (2): 216–241. doi:  10.1177/0190272511408055
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272511408055 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heritage, John , and Anna Lindström
    2012 “Advice Giving – Terminable and Interminable: The Case of British Health Visitors.” InAdvice in Discourse, ed. by Holger Limberg , and Miriam A. Locher , 169–193. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.221.11her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.11her [Google Scholar]
  16. Heritage, John , and Sue Sefi
    1992 “Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions between Health Visitors and First-Time Visitors. InTalk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew , and John Heritage , 359–419. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoey, Elliott M.
    2018 “How Speakers Continue with Talk after A Lapse in Conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction51 (3): 329–346. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2018.1485234
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485234 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with An Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 13–31. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  19. Hutchby, Ian
    1995 “Aspects of Recipient Design in Expert Advice-Giving on Call in Radio.” Discourse Processes19 (2): 219–238. doi:  10.1080/01638539509544915
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544915 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee-Wong, Song Mei
    1998 “Face Support – Chinese Particles as Mitigators: A Study of ba a/ya and ne.” Pragmatics8 (3): 387–404. doi:  10.1075/prag.8.3.01lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.8.3.01lee [Google Scholar]
  21. Leppänen, Vesa
    1998 “The Straightforwardness of Advice: Advice-Giving in Interactions between Swedish District Nurses and Patients.” Research on Language and Social Interaction31 (2): 209–239. doi:  10.1207/s15327973rlsi3102_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3102_3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Charles N. , and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, Chuntao
    2020 “Asymmetrical Relationship Construction in Medical Interactions – A Case Study of Advice-Giving in Mandarin Chinese.” Communication and linguistic Studies6 (1): 10–15. doi:  10.11648/j.cls.20200601.13
    https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20200601.13 [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Ing Cherry
    1999Utterance-Final Particles in Taiwanese: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis. Taipei: Crane.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Limberg, Holger , and Miriam A. Locher
    (eds) 2012Advice in Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.221
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221 [Google Scholar]
  26. Locher, Miriam A.
    2004Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110926552
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110926552 [Google Scholar]
  27. Locher, Miriam A. , and Graham, Sage L.
    2010 “Introduction to Interpersonal Pragmatics.” InInterpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher , and Sage L. Graham , 1–13. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214338.1.225
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.1.225 [Google Scholar]
  28. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard J. Watts
    2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behavior.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield , and Miriam A. Locher , 77–99. Berline: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Locher, Miriam A. , and Sage L. Graham
    2010 “Introduction to Interpersonal Pragmatics.” InInterpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher , and Sage L. Graham , 1–13. Berline: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214338.1.225
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.1.225 [Google Scholar]
  30. Luke, Kang-Kwong
    1990Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.9 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012 “Dislocation or Afterthought? – A Conversation Analytic Account of Incremental Sentences in Chinese.” Discourse Processes49 (3–4): 338–365. doi:  10.1080/0163853X.2012.658502
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.658502 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mao, Yan-Sheng , and Xin Zhao
    2019 “By the Mitigation One Knows the Doctor: Mitigation Strategies by Chinese Doctors in Online Medical Consultation. Health Communication35 (6): 667–674. doi:  10.1080/10410236.2019.1582312
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1582312 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mushin, Ilana , and Rod Gardner
    2009 “Silence is Talk: Conversational Silence in Australian Aboriginal Talk-in-Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics41 (10): 2033–2052. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nielsen, Søren Beck
    2016 How Doctors Manage Consulting Computer Records while Interacting with Patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction49 (1): 58–74. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2016.1126451
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126451 [Google Scholar]
  35. Paul, Waltraud , and Victor Junnan Pan
    2017 “What you See is What you Get: Chinese Sentence-Final Particles as Head-Final Complementizers.” InDiscourse Particles: Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Josef Bayer , and Volker Struckmeier , 49–77. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pilnick, Alison , and Olga Zayts
    2014 “It’s Just A Likelihood: Uncertainty as Topic and Resource in Conveying Positive Results in An Antenatal Screening Clinic.” Symbolic Interaction37 (2): 187–208. doi:  10.1002/symb.99
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.99 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2015 “Advice, Authority, and Autonomy in Shared Decision-Making in Antenatal Screening: The Importance of Context.” Sociology of Health & Illness38 (3): 343–359. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9566.12346
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12346 [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson, Janice H. , Lynn C. Callister , Judith A. Berry , and Karen A. Dearing
    2008 “Patient-Centered Care and Adherence: Definitions and Applications to Improve Outcomes.” Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners20 (12): 600–607. doi:  10.1111/j.1745‑7599.2008.00360.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00360.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sarangi, Srikant , Kristina Bennert , Lucy Howell , Angus Clarke , Peter Harper , and Jonathon Gray
    2004 “Initiation of Reflective Frames in Counseling for Huntingtons Disease Predictive Testing.” Journal of Genetic Counseling13 (2): 135–155. doi:  10.1023/B:JOGC.0000018823.60761.e0
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGC.0000018823.60761.e0 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sarangi, Srikant , and Angus Clarke
    2002 “Zones of Expertise and the Management of Uncertainty in Genetics Risk Communication.” Research on Language and Social Interaction35 (2): 115–137. doi:  10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2011 Word Repeats as Unit Ends. Discourse Studies13 (3): 367–380. doi:  10.1177/1461445611402749
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611402749 [Google Scholar]
  43. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2011 “Conceptualizing the ‘Relational’ in Pragmatics: Insights from Metapragmatic Emotion and (Im)politeness Comments.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (14): 3565–3578. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2013 “Relating at Work: Facets, Dialectics and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics58: 121–137. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.010 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stede, Manfred , and Birte Schmitz
    2000 “Discourse Particles and Discourse Functions.” Machine Translation15 (1): 127–147. doi:  10.1023/A:1011112031877
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011112031877 [Google Scholar]
  46. Stivers, Tanya
    2005 “Parent Resistance to Physicians’ Treatment Recommendations: One Resource for Initiating A Negotiation of the Treatment Decision.” Health Communication18 (1): 41–74. doi:  10.1207/s15327027hc1801_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1801_3 [Google Scholar]
  47. Waring, Hansun Zhang
    2007 “Complex Advice Acceptance as a Resource for Managing Asymmetries.” Text & Talk27 (1): 107–137. 10.1515/TEXT.2007.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan
    2004Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Chinese Particles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.117 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2005 “There is More than Meets the Eye!: The Use of Final ou in Two Sequential Positions in Mandarin Chinese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics37 (7): 967–995. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  50. Yip, Jesse W. C.
    2020 “Directness of Advice Giving in Traditional Chinese Medicine Consultations.” Journal of Pragmatics166: 28–38. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.016 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zayts, Olga , and Stephanie Schnurr
    2012 “You may Know Better than I Do: Negotiating Advice-Giving in Down Syndrome Screening in a Hong Kong Prenatal Hospital.” InAdvice in Discourse, ed. by Holger Limberg , and Miriam A. Locher , 195–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.221.12zay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.12zay [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang, Hang
    2017 “The Effects of Tonal Markedness in Second Language Chinese Tones.” InKey Issues in Chinese as A Second Language Research, ed. by Istvan Kecskes , and Chaofen Sun , 57–80. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315660264‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315660264-3 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20010.jin
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20010.jin
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error