Incoherence in L2 writing

References

1. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
   1990 Pragmatic word order in English composition. InU. Connor & A. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 43–65). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Carrell, P.
   1982 Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 479–488. 10.2307/3586466
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3586466 [Google Scholar]
3. Chen, Y., & Baker, P.
   2016 Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Applied Linguistics, 37, 849–880.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chiang, S.
   2003 The importance of cohesive conditions to perceptions of writing quality at the early stages of foreign language learning. System, 31, 471–484. 10.1016/j.system.2003.02.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.02.002 [Google Scholar]
5. Connor, U.
   1990 Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 67–87.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Crossley, S., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D.
   2016a The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1227–1237. 10.3758/s13428‑015‑0651‑7
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7 [Google Scholar]
7. Crossley, S., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D.
   2016b The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003 [Google Scholar]
8. Crossley, S., & McNamara, D.
   2011 Shared features of L2 writing: Intergroup homogeneity and text classification. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 271–285. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.007
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.007 [Google Scholar]
9. Crossley, S., & McNamara, D.
   2012 Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 2, 115–135. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2010.01449.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x [Google Scholar]
10. Crossley, S., Yang, H. S., & McNamara, D.
    2014 What’s so simple about simplified texts? A computational and psycholinguistic investigation of text comprehension and text processing. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(1), 92–113.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cumming, A.
    1990 Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing, 7, 31–51. 10.1177/026553229000700104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229000700104 [Google Scholar]
12. Eckes, T.
    2008 Rater types in writing performance assessments: A classification approach to rater variability. Language Testing, 25(2), 155–185. 10.1177/0265532207086780
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207086780 [Google Scholar]
13. Ferris, D.
    1994 Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 414–420. 10.2307/3587446
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587446 [Google Scholar]
14. Guo, L., Crossley, S., & McNamara, D.
    2013 Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, 18, 218–238. 10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002 [Google Scholar]
15. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R.
    1976 Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harman, R.
    2013 Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 125–140. 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.006 [Google Scholar]
17. Hyland, K.
    2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London, UK: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jiang, W.
    2013 Measurements of development in L2 written production: The case of L2 Chinese. Applied Linguistics, 34, 1–24. 10.1093/applin/ams019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams019 [Google Scholar]
19. Kang, Y. J.
    2005 Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 259–279. 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.10.002 [Google Scholar]
20. Kennedy, C., & Thorp, D.
    2007 A corpus-based investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS academic writing task. InL. Taylor & P. Falvey (Eds), IELTS collected papers: Research in speaking and writing assessment (pp. 316–377). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Knoch, U.
    2007 ‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence. Assessing Writing, 12(2), 108–128. 10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
22. Kormos, J.
    2011 Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 148–161. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001 [Google Scholar]
23. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    2014 Rating written performance: What do raters do and why?Language Testing, 31, 329–348. 10.1177/0265532214526174
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214526174 [Google Scholar]
24. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    2017 Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 34, 321–336. 10.1177/0265532216663991
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216663991 [Google Scholar]
25. Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., & Gilabert, R.
    2010 Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. InI. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 81–99). Eurosla: European Second Language Association.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Li, S.
    2014 The gap in the use of lexical cohesive devices in writing between native Chinese speakers and second language users. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 49(3), 25–47.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Li, T., & Wharton, S.
    2012 Metadiscourse repertoire of L1 Mandarin undergraduates writing in English: A cross-contextual, cross-disciplinary study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 345–356. 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.004 [Google Scholar]
28. Liu, M., & Braine, G.
    2005 Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623–636. 10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002 [Google Scholar]
29. McCulley, G.
    1985 Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 269–282.
    [Google Scholar]
30. McCutchen, D.
    1996 A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–325. 10.1007/BF01464076
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464076 [Google Scholar]
31. McNamara, D.
    2001 Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62. 10.1037/h0087352
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087352 [Google Scholar]
32. McNamara, D., Crossley, S., & McCarthy, P.
    2010 Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27, 57–86. 10.1177/0741088309351547
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547 [Google Scholar]
33. McNamara, D., Crossley, S., & Roscoe, R.
    2013 Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 499–515. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0258‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1 [Google Scholar]
34. McNamara, D., & Kintsch, W.
    1996 Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–288. 10.1080/01638539609544975
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975 [Google Scholar]
35. McNamara, D., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W.
    1996 Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43. 10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1 [Google Scholar]
36. Neuner, J.
    1987 Cohesive ties and chains in good and poor freshman essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 92–105.
    [Google Scholar]
37. O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D.
    2007 Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43, 121–152. 10.1080/01638530709336895
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336895 [Google Scholar]
38. Reid, J.
    1992 A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 79–107. 10.1016/1060‑3743(92)90010‑M
    https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(92)90010-M [Google Scholar]
39. Schoonen, R.
    2005 Generalizability of writing scores: an application of structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 22(1), 1–30. 10.1191/0265532205lt295oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt295oa [Google Scholar]
40. Schoonen, R., Vergeer, M., & Eiting, M.
    1997 The assessment of writing ability: Expert readers versus lay readers. Language Testing, 14(2), 157–184. 10.1177/026553229701400203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229701400203 [Google Scholar]
41. Tannen, D.
    1984 Spoken and written narrative in English and Greek. InD. Tannen (Ed.). Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 21–41). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Weigle, S. C.
    2007 Teaching writing teachers about assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 194–209. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.004 [Google Scholar]
43. Witte, S., & Faigley, L.
    1981 Coherence, cohesion, and writing ability. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189–204. 10.2307/356693
    https://doi.org/10.2307/356693 [Google Scholar]
44. Yang, C.
    2013 Textual conjunctives and topic-fronting devices in CFL learners’ written summaries. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 48(1), 71–89.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Yang, W., & Sun, Y.
    2012 The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31–48. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004 [Google Scholar]