1887
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates intellectual discourse in China during the COVID-19 coronavirus crisis through two discourse analyses, aiming to see the role of intellectuals in leading public discussion and perception on government decisions in times of crisis. Digital ethnography and digital discourse analysis are implemented to do a micro and in-depth analysis of texts and the media engagement of the Chinese intellectuals. In the context in which the presence and reception of public intellectuals in China has been transformed from pro-West to intellectuals , this study reviews the moral values and norms that promoted governmental policies and social coherence embedded in a new intellectual discourse. It contributes to the analysis of the dynamics and flexibility of China’s public communication in times of crisis within the social context in which online activities and offline realities are closely bonded in modern China.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20029.tan
2022-03-29
2022-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann, Thomas
    (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blommaert, Jan
    (2005) Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2015) Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 105–116. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102214‑014035
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014035 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2018) Durkheim and the Internet: Sociolinguistics and the sociological imagination. Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350055223
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350055223 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2019) Political discourse in post-digital societies. Retrieved fromhttps://alternative-democracy-research.org/2019/12/11/political-discourse-in-post-digital-societies/
  6. Blommaert, Jan & Dong, Jie
    (2010) Ethnographic fieldwork: A beginner’s guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692962
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692962 [Google Scholar]
  7. Briggs, Charles L. & Bauman, Richard
    (1992) Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2: 131–172. 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chanley, Virginia A., Rudolph, Thomas J. & Rahn, Wendy M.
    (2000) The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (3): 239–256, 10.1086/317987
    https://doi.org/10.1086/317987 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Gong
    (2010) A new exploration on the information disclosure mechanism of crisis communication in the Web age (wangluo shidai weiji chuanbo de xinxi gongkai jizhi xintan). China Publishing Journal, (02): 5–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Collini, Stefan
    (2009 [2006]) Absent minds, intellectuals in Britain. Reprint. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cucciniello, Maria & Nasi, Greta
    (2014) Transparency for Trust in Government: How Effective is Formal Transparency?International Journal of Public Administration, 37 (13): 911–921. 10.1080/01900692.2014.949754
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.949754 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dahlgren, P.
    (2012) Public Intellectuals, Online Media, and Public Spheres: Current Realignments. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 25: 95–110. 10.1007/s10767‑012‑9124‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9124-5 [Google Scholar]
  13. Goldman, M., & Gu, E.
    (Eds.) (2003) Chinese intellectuals between state and market. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422113
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422113 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gonçalves, Arnaldo
    (2016) The Role of Intellectuals and Political Oratory in Modern Democracies. Pyrex Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 2 (1): 21–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gramsci, Antonio
    (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated byQuintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowel Smith. New York: International Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Han, Rongbin
    (2018) Withering Gongzhi: Cyber Criticism of Chinese Public Intellectuals. International Journal of Communication. 12. 1966–1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Heynders, Odile
    (2016) Writers as Public Intellectuals: Literature, Celebrity, Democracy. Palgrave Studies in Modern European Literature. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137467645
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467645 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hou, Mingyi
    (2019) Where have the Chinese public intellectuals gone? Diggit Magazine. Rertrieved fromhttps://www.diggitmagazine.com/column/where-have-chinese-public-intellectuals-gone
  19. Hymes, Dell
    (1996) Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality. Toward an Understanding of Voice. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacobs, Ronald & Townsley, Eleanor
    (2012) The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere. The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere, 1–312. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199797929.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199797929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones, R. H.
    (2009) ‘Dancing, skating and sex: action and text in the digital age’, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(3): 283–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones, R., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A.
    (Eds.) (2015) Discourse and Digital Practices. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315726465
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726465 [Google Scholar]
  23. Karlova, Natascha A. & Fisher, Karen E.
    (2013) A Social Diffusion Model of Misinformation and Disinformation for Understanding Human Information Behaviour. Retrieved frominformationr.net/ir/18-1/paper573.html#.XrAJZBMzZQI
  24. Klimeš, O. & Marinelli, M.
    (2018) Introduction: Ideology, Propaganda, and Political Discourse in the Xi Jinping Era. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 23: 313–322. 10.1007/s11366‑018‑9566‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9566-3 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, Eric
    (2013) A tale of two political systems. Retrieved fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0YjL9rZyR0
  26. Lee, Kaman
    (2009) How the Hong Kong Government Lost the Public Trust in SARS: Insights for Government Communication in a Health Crisis. Public Relations Review, 35: 74–76. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Xin
    (2015) Publicity, knowledge production, and the “mediated presence” of Chinese intellectuals (gonggongxing, zhishi shengchan yu zhongguo zhishi fenzi de “meijiehua” zaichang. Jinan Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 000 (002): 24–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Yongjin
    (2018) The continuity and development of Mao Zedong Thought in the socialism with Chinese characteristics in Xi Jinping’s New Era (Xi Jinping xinshidai zhongguo tese shehui zhuyi sixiang dui Mao Zedong sixiang de jicheng he fazhan). Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology, 21 (5): 17–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Maly, Ico
    (2018) Populism as a mediatized communicative relation: The birth of algorithmic populism. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies213. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/328095323_Populism_as_a_mediatized_communicative_relation_The_birth_of_algorithmic_populism
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Niu, Huiqing
    (2011) A study on relationship between Chinese intellectuals and TV media (zhongguo zhishifenzi yu dianshi meiti guanxi yanjiu). Communication University of China Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. OECD
    OECD (2013) “Trust in government, policy effectiveness and the governance agenda”, inGovernment at a Glance 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris, 10.1787/gov_glance‑2013‑6‑en
    https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2013-6-en [Google Scholar]
  32. Peterson, Eskild
    (2020) Editorial. Li Wenliang, a face to the frontline healthcare worker. The first doctor to notify the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2, (COVID-19), outbreak. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 93: 205–207. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30111-9/fulltext#articleInformation
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sagarin, Edward & Kelly, Robert J.
    (1969) “Karl Mannheim and the Sociology of Knowledge”. Salmagundi (10/11): 292–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Semino, Elena, Deignan, Alice & Littlemore, Jeannette
    (2013) Metaphor, Genre, and Recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 (1): 41–59. 10.1080/10926488.2013.742842
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742842 [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, Cheng
    (2020) Web celebrity of knowledge: The role of transformation of intellectuals in postmodern society. Editorial Friend, 3 (5): 78–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Thomas, C. W.
    (1998) Maintaining and Restoring Public Trust in Government Agencies and their Employees. Administration & Society, 30 (2): 166–193. Retrieved from10.1177/0095399798302003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399798302003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Van de Walle, S. & Bouckaert, Geert
    (2003) Public Service Performance and Trust in Government: The Problem of Causality, International Journal of Public Administration, 29 (8 & 9): 891–913. 10.1081/PAD‑120019352
    https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120019352 [Google Scholar]
  38. Vasu, N.,
    (2018) Fake news: National security in the post truth era. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. RetrievedAugust 15, 2021, fromwww.jstor.org/stable/resrep17648.3
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, Yiran & Mark, Gloria
    (2013) Trust in Online News: Comparing Social Media and Official Media Use by Chinese Citizens. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Association for Computing Machinery, New York: 599–610. 10.1145/2441776.2441843
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441843 [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Xiaoling
    (2011) From totalitarianism to hegemony: The reconfiguration of the party-state and the transformation of Chinese communication, Journal of Contemporary China, 20:68, 103–115, 10.1080/10670564.2011.520850
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.520850 [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Yaohong & Li, Changzhen
    (2016) A study on information release strategies of governments in public emergencies (tufa gonggong shijian zhong de zhengfu xinxi fabu celue yanjiu). Liaoning xingzheng xueyuan xuebao.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20029.tan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.20029.tan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error