Speakers’ subjective evaluation of adversity

References

1. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
   1989 “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect.” Text9(1): 93–124.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cao, Min
   2016 “The effect of English passive voice learning on the use of ‘bei’ structure: An empirical study.” International Journal of English Linguistics6(4): 197–206. 10.5539/ijel.v6n4p197
   https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n4p197 [Google Scholar]
3. Chao, Yuan Ren
   1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chappell, Hilary
   1986 “Formal and colloquial adversity passives in Standard Chinese.” Linguistics24(6): 1025–1052. 10.1515/ling.1986.24.6.1025
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.6.1025 [Google Scholar]
5. Chappell, Hillary, and Dingxu Shi
   2016 “Major non-canonical clause types: ba and bei.” InA Reference Grammar of Chinese, ed. byChu-ren Huang and Dingxu Shi, 451–482. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028462.016
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028462.016 [Google Scholar]
6. Cook, Angela
   2019 “The use of the passive marker bei in spoken Mandarin.” Australian Journal of Linguistics39(1): 79–106. 10.1080/07268602.2019.1542934
   https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2019.1542934 [Google Scholar]
7. Deng, Xiangjun, Ziyin Mai, and Virginia Yip
   2018 “An aspectual account of ba and bei constructions in child Mandarin.” First Language38(3): 243–262. 10.1177/0142723717743363
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723717743363 [Google Scholar]
8. Du Bois, John W.
   2007 “The stance triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. byRobert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
9. Englebretson, Robert
   (ed) 2007 Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164 [Google Scholar]
10. Gentens, Caroline, María Sol Sansiñena, Stef Spronck, and An Van linden
    2019 “Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches.” Pragmatics29 (2): 155–169.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Guo, Hongjie, and Daryl Chow
    2014 “A corpus-based variationist approach to bei passives in Mandarin Chinese.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory10(1): 139–173. 10.1515/cllt‑2013‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0017 [Google Scholar]
14. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    2013 Japanese: Revised edition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin. 10.1075/loall.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.17 [Google Scholar]
15. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo, and Ting Jing
    2011 “Embodied semantics and pragmatics: Empathy, sympathy and two passive constructions in Chinese media discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics431: 2826–2844. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.005 [Google Scholar]
16. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2007 “Cognitive Grammar.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. byDirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 421–462. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Liu, Feng-Hsi
    2011 “The bei passive and its discourse motivations.” Chinese Language and Discourse2(2): 198–231. 10.1075/cld.2.2.03liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.2.2.03liu [Google Scholar]
19. Liu, Haiyong
    2011 “Expletive negation in Mandarin cha-dian-mei “miss-bit-not” + v structure.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics39(1): 123–148.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Local, John, and Gareth Walker
    2008 “Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources.” Text & Talk28 (6): 723–747. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.037 [Google Scholar]
21. Markee, Numa
    2017 “Are replication studies possible in qualitative second/foreign language classroom research? A call for comparative re-production research.” Language Teaching50(3): 367–383. 10.1017/S0261444815000099
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000099 [Google Scholar]
22. Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi Schieffelin
    1989 “Language has a heart.” Text91: 7–25.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Oshima, David Y.
    2006 “Adversity and Korean/Japanese passives: Constructional analogy.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics151: 137–166. 10.1007/s10831‑005‑4915‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-005-4915-6 [Google Scholar]
24. Peyraube, Alain
    1989 “History of the passive constructions in Chinese until the 10th century.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics17(2): 335–372.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Shi, Dingshu
    1997 “Issues on Chinese passive.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics25(1): 41–70.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Su, Danjie
    2017 “Significance as a lens: Understanding the Mandarin ba construction through Discourse Adjacent Alternation.” Journal of Pragmatics1171: 204–230. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.019 [Google Scholar]
27. Su, Danjie
    2019 The M. Chinese Video Corpus (MCVC). UCLA, Los Angeles & University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Su, Danjie
    2022a “Early evidence of the Pareto Principle in grammatical distribution: Causative situations in Chinese conversational discourse.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics50(2): 443–474. 10.1353/jcl.2022.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2022.0017 [Google Scholar]
29. Su, Danjie
    2022b “Factuality lens: Choosing the unmarked passive construction in Chinese conversation.” Chinese Language and Discourse13(2): 242–274. 10.1075/cld.21005.su
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.21005.su [Google Scholar]
30. Su, Danjie, and Jianming Lu
    2010 “The construction-chunking approach for syntactic analysis and second language teaching.” Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Journal of Chinese Teaching in the World] 24(4): 557–567.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sun, Chaofen
    1996 Word-order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Stubbs, Michael
    1986 “A matter of prolonged field work: Notes towards a modal grammar of English.” Applied Linguistics7(1): 1–25. 10.1093/applin/7.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.1.1 [Google Scholar]
33. Tao, Hongyin, and Yaqiong Liu
    2010 “From register differences to grammatical differences: Grammatical constructions in natural speech and the media.” (Part one). Contemporary Rhetoric157(1): 37–44.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wu, Haiping, and Hongyin Tao
    2018 “Expressing (inter)subjectivity with universal quantification: A pragmatic account of plural NP + dou expressions in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics1281: 1–21. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.003 [Google Scholar]
35. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
    2004 Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.117 [Google Scholar]
36. Xiao, Richard, Tony McEnery, and Yufang Qian
    2006 “Passive constructions in English and Chinese: A corpus-based contrastive study.” Languages in Contrast6(1): 109–149. 10.1075/lic.6.1.05xia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.6.1.05xia [Google Scholar]
37. Zhang, Yi
    2020 “Non-canonical passives in Chinese: A mental space account.” Chinese Language and Discourse11(1): 84–106. 10.1075/cld.19001.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.19001.zha [Google Scholar]
38. Zheng, Weiqi, Ye Liu, Chang Hong Liu, Yu-Hsin Chen, Qian Cui, and Xiaolan Fu
    2019 “The influence of event valence and emotional states on the metaphorical comprehension of time.” Frontiers in Psychology101: 410. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00410
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00410 [Google Scholar]