Creating individual styles through discourse variation in Singapore Mandarin

References

1. Agha, Asif
   2003 “The social life of cultural value.” Language and Communication (): –. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00012‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 [Google Scholar]
2. Barlow, Michael
   2013 “Individual differences and usage-based grammar.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (): –. 10.1075/ijcl.18.4.01bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.4.01bar [Google Scholar]
3. Becker, Kara
   2014 “The social motivations of reversal: Raised BOUGHT in New York City English.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404514000372
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000372 [Google Scholar]
4. Brinton, Laurel J.
   1996 Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907582
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
5. Chatman, Seymour
   1967 “Stylistics: Quantitative and qualitative.” Style: –.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chua, Chee Lay
   2003 The emergence of Singapore Mandarin: A case study of language contact. PhD Dissertation. USA: The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
7. Coupland, Nikolas
   1980 “Style shifting in a Cardiff work setting.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500007752
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007752 [Google Scholar]
8. Coupland, Nikolas
   1985 “‘Hark, hark, the lark’: Social motivations for phonological style-shifting.” Language and Communication (): –. 10.1016/0271‑5309(85)90007‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(85)90007-2 [Google Scholar]
9. Coupland, Nikolas
   2001 “Language, situation and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics.” InStyle and sociolinguistic variation, ed. byPenny Eckert, and John R. Rickford, –. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cutillas-Espinosa, Juan Antonio, Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy, and Natalie Schilling-Estes
    2010 “Hyper-vernacularisation and speaker design: A case study.” Folia Linguistica (): –. 10.1515/flin.2010.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2010.002 [Google Scholar]
11. D’Onofrio, Annette
    2020 “Personae in sociolinguistic variation.” WIREs Cognitive Science(). 10.1002/wcs.1543
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1543 [Google Scholar]
12. Díaz-Campos, Manuel, and Pollock, Matthew
    2023 “The future of usage-based sociolinguistics.” InThe handbook of usage-based linguistics, ed. byManuel Diaz-Campos, and Sonia Balasch, –. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119839859.ch28
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119839859.ch28 [Google Scholar]
13. Eckert, Penelope
    2001 “Style and social meaning.” InStyle and sociolinguistic variation, ed. byPenelope Eckert, and John J. Rickford, –. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eckert, Penelope
    2008 “Variation and the indexical field.” Journal of Sociolinguistics (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
15. Fischer, Kerstin
    2006 “Towards an understanding of approaches to discourse particles: Introduction to the volume.” InApproaches to discourse particles, ed. byKerstin Fischer, –. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1163/9780080461588_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_002 [Google Scholar]
16. Han, Chong
    2015 “Identity construction in weibo communication Chinese overseas students’ experiences in Australia.” InContemporary Chinese discourse and social practice in China, ed. byLinda T. H. Tsung, and Wei Wang, –. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scld.4.09han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.4.09han [Google Scholar]
17. Howard, Darlene V., and James H. Howard
    1977 “A multidimensional scaling analysis of the development of animal names.” Developmental Psychology (): –. 10.1037/0012‑1649.13.2.108
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.13.2.108 [Google Scholar]
18. Johnstone, Barbara
    2000 “The individual voice in language.” Annual Review of Anthropology, (): –. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.405
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.405 [Google Scholar]
19. Johnstone, Barbara
    2011 “Dialect enregisterment in performance.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00512.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00512.x [Google Scholar]
20. Johnstone, Barbara
    2017 “Characterological figures and expressive style in the enregisterment of linguistic variety.” InLanguage and a sense of place, ed. byChris Montgomery, and Emma Moore, –. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316162477.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162477.015 [Google Scholar]
21. Lee, Cher Leng
    . (Forthcoming). “Xinjiapohuayu yuqici yanjiu [A study of Singapore Mandarin sentence final particles].” InGlobal Variation of Chinese Grammar, Singapore Edition. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lee, Junwen
    2012 Separating meaning and function: A relevance-theoretic analysis of discourse particles in Colloquial Singapore English. MA thesis. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
23. McClelland, James L., and Timothy T. Rogers
    2003 “The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience (): –. 10.1038/nrn1076
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1076 [Google Scholar]
24. Pak, Xin Yan
    2014 Xinjiapohuayu jumo yuqici: Zai yuliaoku jichushang yu Putonghua de duibi tongji [Statistical comparison of Singaporean and Mainland Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study on sentence final particles]. BA(Hons) thesis. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University of Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Popov, Vencislav, and Lynne M. Reder
    2020 “Frequency effects on memory: A resource-limited theory.” Psychological Review (): –. 10.1037/rev0000161
    https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000161 [Google Scholar]
26. Ronan, Patricia, and Martin Schweinberger
    2024 “An introduction to sociopragmatic variation.” InSocio-pragmatic variation in Ireland: Using pragmatic variation to construct social identities, ed. byMartin Schweinberger and Patricia Ronan. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110791457‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110791457-001 [Google Scholar]
27. Ross, Brian H., and Gregory L. Murphy
    1999 “Food for thought: Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain.” Cognitive Psychology (): –. 10.1006/cogp.1998.0712
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0712 [Google Scholar]
28. Schilling-Estes, Natalie
    1998 “Investigating ‘self-conscious’ speech: The performance register in Ocracoke English.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500019722
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019722 [Google Scholar]
29. Sharma, Devyani
    2018 “Style dominance: Attention, audience, and the ‘real me.’” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404517000835
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000835 [Google Scholar]
30. Shi, Heidi H., and Zhuo Jing-Schmidt
    2020 “Little cutie one piece: An innovative human classifier and its social indexicality in Chinese digital culture.” Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal (): –. 10.1075/cld.00023.shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00023.shi [Google Scholar]
31. Storm, Christine
    1980 “The semantic structure of animal terms: A developmental study.” International Journal of Behavioral Development (): –. 10.1177/016502548000300403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548000300403 [Google Scholar]
32. Teo, Ming Chew
    2020 Crosslinguistic influence in Singapore English: Linguistic and social aspects. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429463853
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429463853 [Google Scholar]
33. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher
    2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Unger, Layla, Olivera Savic, and Vladimir M. Sloutsky
    2020 “Statistical regularities shape semantic organization throughout development.” Cognition: Article 104190. 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104190
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104190 [Google Scholar]
35. Wang, Wei
    2015 “Co-construction of migrant workers’ identities on a TV talk show in China.” InContemporary Chinese discourse and social practice in China, ed. byLinda T. H. Tsung, and Wei Wang, –. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scld.4.08wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.4.08wan [Google Scholar]
36. Wasserscheidt, Philipp
    2015 “Constructions do not cross languages: On cross-linguistic generalizations of constructions.” Constructions and Frames (): –. 10.1075/cf.6.2.07was
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.6.2.07was [Google Scholar]
37. Wee, Lionel
    2004 “Singapore English: Morphology and syntax.” InA handbook of varieties of English. Volume 2: Morphology and syntax, ed. byBernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider, and Clive Upton, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Weinreich, Uriel
    1953 Languages in contact, findings and problems. New York, NY: Linguistic Circle of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Winford, Donald
    2013 “Social factors in contact languages.” InContact languages: A comprehensive guide, ed. byPeter Bakker, and Yaron Matras, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614513711.363
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513711.363 [Google Scholar]
40. Wong, Suet Ying
    2006 Xinjiapohuayu huihua Zhong de yuciqi ‘leh’ zhi yanjiu [The ‘leh’ particle in Singapore Mandarin]. BA(Hons) thesis. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Yuan, Xuelian, and Jingxia Lin
    2016 “Classifiers in Singapore Mandarin Chinese: A corpus based study.” InChinese Lexical Semantics (Selected Papers of CLSW 2016), ed. byMinghui Dong, Jingxia Lin, and Xuri Tang, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑49508‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49508-8_7 [Google Scholar]
42. Zhu, Xiaohong
    2008 Xinjiapohuayu yufa bianyi yanjiu [A study of grammatical variation in Singapore Mandarin]. PhD Dissertation. Guangzhou: Jinan University.