1887
image of Identification and evaluation of L1 and L2 Chinese accents
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates the identification and evaluation of native language (referred to as L1) and second language (referred to as L2) Chinese accents by Chinese judges. Eleven Chinese speakers, including two Beijing Mandarin speakers, two L1-English L2-Chinese speakers, two L1-Korean L2-Chinese speakers, one L1-Thai L2-Chinese speaker, and five Chinese heritage language (HL) (or American-born Chinese, ABC) speakers, recorded their reading of a passage, . The first 30 seconds of their recordings were extracted, and then the amplitude normalized. 96 Chinese judges completed the accent identification and evaluation tasks online. In the accent identification task, the judges were asked to judge whether the speaker was a native Chinese speaker first. They were then asked to identify their ethnicity and provide reasons/justifications. In the evaluation task, the Chinese judges were asked to rate the accentedness and comprehensibility of the eleven accents on a 0–100 slider scale. The findings of this study reveal that L1 and L2 accents can be differentiated. Among L2/HL accents, some were identified more accurately than others, such as the American L2 and HL accents. All L2/HL speakers except for the Taiwanese HL accent, were identified less accurately, ranging from 12.5% to 34%. Our findings confirm that the familiarity effect is a crucial factor influencing ethnicity identification. The analysis of comprehensibility ratings shows that L1 accents are more comprehensible than all L2 accents, with no significant differences between different L2 accents. Regarding accentedness, all L2/HLs are more accented than L1s, and some L2s are more accented as opposed to others. These findings align with Munro and Derwing’s research (1999), suggesting that accentedness may be independent of comprehensibility, namely, highly accented speech can still be highly comprehensible.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24028.yan
2025-03-11
2025-03-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. “Enrollments in Languages Other Than English in US Institutions of Higher Education, Fall 2021.” MLA. AccessedSeptember 9, 2024. https://www.mla.org
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, W., Eddington, D., & Nay, L.
    2009 Dialect identification: The effects of region of origin and amounts of experience. American Speech, (), –. 10.1215/00031283‑2009‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2009-004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cai, Zhengying, & Wen Cao
    2002 “Taiguo xuesheng hanyu yuyin pianwu fenxi” [An analysis of phonetic errors produced by Thai L2 learners of Chinese]. Teaching Chinese in the World, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang, C. B., & Yao, Yao
    2016 Toward an understanding of heritage prosody: Acoustic and perceptual properties of tone produced by heritage, native, and second language speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal, (), –. 10.46538/hlj.13.2.4
    https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.13.2.4 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2019 Production of neutral tone in Mandarin by heritage, native, and second language speakers. InS. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp.–). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang, C. B., Yao, Y., Haynes, E. F., & Rhodes, R.
    2011 Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.3569736
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3569736 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong, Jie
    2017The Sociolinguistics of Voice in Globalising China. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dougherty, S. C., & Perrachione, T. K.
    2016 The language-familiarity effect in talker identification by highly proficient bilinguals depends on second-language immersion. Presented at the171st Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.1121/1.4950404
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4950404 [Google Scholar]
  9. Flege, James. E., Munro, Murray J. & MacKay, Ian R.
    1995 Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.413041
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413041 [Google Scholar]
  10. Girard, F., Floccia, C., & Goslin, J.
    2008 Perception and awareness of accents in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, (), –. 10.1348/026151007X251712
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X251712 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gnevsheva, Ksenia
    2018Variation in foreign accent identification. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, , : –. 10.1080/01434632.2018.1427756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1427756 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goggin, J. P., Thompson, C. P., Strube, G., & Simental, L. R.
    1991 The role of language familiarity in voice identification. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/BF03199567
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199567 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hollien, H., Majewski, W., & Hollien, P. A.
    1974 Perceptual identification of voices under normal, stress, and disguised speaking conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.1914230
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1914230 [Google Scholar]
  14. Holm, S.
    2009 Intonational and durational contributions to the perception of foreign-accented Norwegian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
  15. Jiang, Yinlian
    1997 “Taiguo ren xuexi Hanyu Putonghua yuyin nandina bianxi” [Phonetic difficulties of Thai L2 learners of Mandarin Chinese. In the proceedings ofThe 5th International Chinese Pedagogy Conference. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kubler, Cornelius C.
    2017Basic Mandarin Chinese — Speaking & Listening Textbook & Practice Book: An Introduction to Spoken for Beginners. Tuttle Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Latinus, M., & Belin, P.
    2011 Anti-voice adaptation suggests prototype-based coding of voice identity. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00175
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00175 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lavner, Y., Rosenhouse, J., & Gath, I.
    2001 The prototype model in speaker identification by human listeners. International Journal of Speech Technology, (), –. 10.1023/A:1009656816383
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009656816383 [Google Scholar]
  19. Levis, J.
    2005 Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2018Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108241564
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564 [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, Yi
    1998 “Rihan xuesheng Hanyu shengdiao pianwu fenxi.” [An analysis of tone errors produced by Japanese and Korean L2 learners of Chinese]. Chinese Teaching in the World, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McKenzie, R. M.
    2010The social psychology of English as a global language. Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑8566‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8566-5 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2015 The sociolinguistics of variety identification and categorization: Free classification of varieties of spoken English amongst non-linguist listeners. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2014.998232
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2014.998232 [Google Scholar]
  24. McKenzie, R. M., Huang, M., Ong, T. T., & Snodin, N.
    2019 Socio-psychological salience and categorization accuracy of speaker place of origin. Lingua, , . 10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  25. McKenzie, R. M.
    2008 The role of variety recognition in Japanese university students’ attitudes towards English speech varieties. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.2167/jmmd565.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd565.0 [Google Scholar]
  26. McKenzie, R. M., & Gilmore, A.
    2017 The people who are out of ‘right’ English”: Japanese university students’ social evaluations of English language diversity and the internationalization of Japanese higher education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/ijal.12110
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12110 [Google Scholar]
  27. Montgomery, C.
    2012 The effect of proximity in perceptual dialectology. Journal of Sociolinguistics, (), –. 10.1111/josl.12003
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    1999 Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.49.s1.8
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nagle, C. L., Rehman, I.
    2021 Doing L2 speech research online: Why and how to collect online ratings data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, ():–. 10.1017/S0272263121000292
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000292 [Google Scholar]
  30. Perrachione, T. K., & Wong, P.
    2007 Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: Implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortex. Neurophychologia, (), –. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.015 [Google Scholar]
  31. Polinsky, Maria
    2018Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107252349
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107252349 [Google Scholar]
  32. Preston, D.
    1996 “Whaddayaknow? The Modes of Folk Linguistic Awareness. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.1996.9959890
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1996.9959890 [Google Scholar]
  33. Purnell, T., Idsardi, W., & Baugh, J.
    1999 Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1177/0261927X99018001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith, L. E., & Bisazza, J. A.
    1982 The comprehensibility of three varieties of English for college students in seven countries. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1982.tb00971.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1982.tb00971.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, Chunyang
    1998 “Hanguo xuesheng yuyin jiaoxue” [Teaching Chinese sounds to Korean L2 learners]. Journal of Nankai University, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sun, Chaofen
    2006Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755019 [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomas, E. R., & Reaser, J.
    2004 Delimiting perceptual cues used for the ethnic labeling of African American and European American voices. Journal of Sociolinguistics, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00251.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00251.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomas, Erik R., Norman J. Lass, and Jeannine Carpenter
    2010 “Identification of African American Speech.” InDennis R. Preston and Nancy Niedzielski (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 219. New York: De Gruyter Mouton. –. 10.1515/9781934078068.2.265
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078068.2.265 [Google Scholar]
  39. Thompson, C. P.
    1987 A language effect in voice identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1002/acp.2350010205
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350010205 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tristova, H., & Yang, C.
    In press. Chinese as a second language prosody. InKecskes, I. and Zhao, Y. eds Development and Use of Chinese as a Second/Foreign Language. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Viger, Tanya
    2007 Fundamental frequency in Mandarin Chinese an English: Implications for second-language speakers. Unpublished Ph. D dissertation. CUNY.
  42. Yang, C.
    2014 Language attitude toward Northeastern Mandarin and PTH by young professionals. Chinese Language and Discourse, , , –. 10.1075/cld.5.2.04yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.5.2.04yan [Google Scholar]
  43. 2016The Acquisition of Second Language Mandarin Prosody: From Experimental Studies to Pedagogical Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bpa.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.1 [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang, C. & Chen, K.
    In press. Mandarin — Issues in applied phonology, phonetics, and pronunciation. InCarol A. Chapelle ed. Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (2nd Edition). Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, Qing
    (2005) A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new profession identity. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S0047404505050153
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050153 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24028.yan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24028.yan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error