Establishing joint attention to embodied actions with zheyang(zi) in Taiwan Mandarin cooking demonstrations

References

1. Auer, Peter, and Anja Stukenbrock
   2022 “Deictic Reference in Space.” InPragmatics of Space, ed. byAndreas H. Jucker and Heiko Hausendorf, 23–63. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
   2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada
   2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (6): 1700–1718.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Eriksson, Mats
   2009 “Referring as Interaction: On the Interplay between Linguistic and Bodily Practices.” Journal of Pragmatics41 (2): 240–262.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fang, Di, and Zhang Wenxian
   2020 ““Zheyang”, “Zhenyang a”, “Zheyang ba” de Huayu Gongneng [Discourse Functions of “Zheyang”, “Zheyang a”, and “Zheyang ba”].” Hanyu Xuebao721: 55–64.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fang, Mei
   2002 “Zhishici ‘zhe’ he ‘na’ zai Beijinghua zhong de yufahua [The grammaticalization of demonstratives ‘zhe’ and ‘na’ in Beijing Mandarin].” Zhongguo Yuwen2891: 343–356.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ferré, Gaëlle
   2012 “Functions of Three Open-Palm Hand Gestures.” Multimodal Communication1 (1): 5–20.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Goodwin, Charles
   1996 “Transparent Vision.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 370–404. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Goodwin, Charles
   2003 “Pointing as Situated Practice.” InPointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet, ed. bySotaro Kita, 217–241. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goodwin, Charles
    2007 “Environmentally Coupled Gestures.” InGesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, ed. bySusan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell, and Elena T. Levy, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.1.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.1.18goo [Google Scholar]
11. Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh, and Paul Luff
    2010 Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hindmarsh, Jon, and Christian Heath
    2000 “Embodied Reference: A Study of Deixis in Workplace Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics32 (12): 1855–1878.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hsieh, Chen-Yu
    2017 “From Receipt of Information to Management of Interaction: The Use of Zheyangzi as a Response Token in Chinese Conversation.” Concentric: Studies in Linguistics43 (2): 87–118.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Huang, Shuanfan
    1999 “The Emergence of a Grammatical Category Definite Article in Spoken Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics31 (1): 77–94.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Huang, Shu-Yu
    2020 “Mandarin Telephone Closings among Familiars: Comparison between Natural Speech and Textbook Dialogues.” Applied Pragmatics2 (2): 198–226.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hydén, Lars-Christer, Ali Reza Majlesi, and Anna Ekström
    2022 “Assisted Eating in Late-Stage Dementia: Intercorporeal Interaction.” Journal of Aging Studies611: 101000.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene Lerner, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
18. Kasper, Gabriele, and Alfred R. Burch
    2016 “Focus on Form in the Wild.” InAuthenticity, Language, and Interaction in Second Language Contexts, ed. byRémi A. Van Compernolle and Janice McGregor, 198–232. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Keevallik, Leelo
    2015 “Coordinating the Temporalities of Talk and Dance.” InTemporality in Interaction, ed. byArnulf Deppermann and Susanne Günthner, 309–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.27.10kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.10kee [Google Scholar]
20. Keevallik, Leelo
    2018 “What Does Embodied Interaction Tell Us about Grammar?” Research on Language and Social Interaction51 (1): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Keevallik, Leelo
    2020 “Linguistic Structures Emerging in the Synchronization of a Pilates Class.” InMobilizing Others: Grammar and Lexi within Larger Activities, ed. byCarmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz, and Peter Golato, 147–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Keevallik, Leelo, and Marri Amon
    2024 “Seeing is Believing: The Multisensorial Emergence of the Estonian Näed ‘You See’as an Evidential.” Interactional Linguistics4 (1): 38–67.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kendon, Adam
    2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lee, Yu-Hui
    2020 “Indexicality and Discourse Functions of Manner Demonstratives Zheyang and Nayang in Spoken Mandarin.” PhD diss. University of California.
25. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lilja, Niina, and Arja Piirainen-Marsh
    2022 “Recipient Design by Gestures: How Depictive Gestures Embody Actions in Cooking Instructions.” Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality51: 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lindwall, Oskar, and Anna Ekström
    2012 “Instruction-in-Interaction: The Teaching and Learning of a Manual Skill.” Human Studies35 (1): 27–49.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Liu, Yuehua, Wenyu Pan, and Wei Gu
    2019 Shiyong Xiandai Hanyu Yufa [A functional grammar of modern Chinese]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lu, Xiaolong
    2015 “Taiwan Hanyu ‘Zheyangzi’ Bianxi [‘Zheyangzi’ in Spoken Chinese of Taiwan].” Journal of Shenyang University17 (5): 695–700.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lü, Shuxiang
    2010 Xiandai Hanyu Ba Bai Ci [800 words of modern Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mondada, Lorenza
    2012 “Deixis: An Integrated Interactional Multimodal Analysis.” InProsody and Embodiment in Interactional Grammar, ed. byPia Bergmann, Jana Brenning, Martin Pfeiffer, and Elisabeth Reber, 173–206. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mondada, Lorenza
    2014a “Pointing, Talk and the Bodies: Reference and Joint Attention as Embodied Interactional Achievements.” InGesture in Conversation to Visible Utterance in Action, ed. byMarianne Seyfeddinipur and Marianne Gullberg, 95–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.188.06mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.06mon [Google Scholar]
34. Mondada, Lorenza
    2014b “Cooking Instructions and the Shaping of Things in the Kitchen.” InInteracting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. byMaurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 199–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186.09mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.09mon [Google Scholar]
35. Mondada, Lorenza
    2022 “Working with Video Data.” InThe Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Design, ed. byUwe Flick, 748–770. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nguyen, Hanh thi
    2009 “The Recommendation Sequence in Vietnamese Family Talk: Negotiation of Asymmetric Access to Authority and Knowledge.” InTalk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. byHanh thi Nguyen and Gabriele Kasper, 57–87. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Nishizaka, Aug
    2020 “Appearance and Action: The Sequential Organization of Instructions in Japanese Calligraphy Lessons.” Research on Language and Social Interaction53 (3): 295–323.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Leelo Keevallik, and Xiaoting Li
    2022 “Editorial: The Grammar-Body Interface in Social Interaction.” Frontiers in Psychology131: 875696.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Råman, Joonas
    2019 “Budo Demonstrations as Shared Accomplishments: The Modalities of Guiding in the Joint Teaching of Physical Skills.” Journal of Pragmatics1501: 17–38.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Råman, Joonas, and Pentti Haddington
    2018 “Demonstrations in Sports Training: Communicating a Technique through Parsing and the Return-Practice in the Budo Class.” Multimodal Communication7 (2): 20180001.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Streeck, Jürgen
    2002 “Grammars, Words, and Embodied Meanings: On the Uses and Evolution of So and Like.” Journal of Communication52 (3): 581–596.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2014 “Take the Words out of My Mouth: Verbal Instructions as Embodied Practices.” Journal of Pragmatics651: 80–102.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2018 “Mobile Dual Eye-Tracking in Face-to-Face Interaction: The Case of Deixis and Joint Attention.” InEye-Tracking in Interaction: Studies on the Role of Eye Gaze in Dialogue, ed. byGeert Brône and Bert Oben, 265–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ais.10.11stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.10.11stu [Google Scholar]
45. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2020 “Deixis, Meta-Perceptive Gaze Practices, and the Interactional Achievement of Joint Attention.” Frontiers in Psychology111: 1779.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2021 “Multimodal Gestalts and Their Change over Time: Is Routinization Also Grammaticalization?” Frontiers in Communication61: 662240.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, Emma Betz, and Peter Golato
    (eds) 2020 Mobilizing Others: Grammar and Lexis within Larger Activities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33 [Google Scholar]
48. ten Have, Paul
    2002 “The Notion of Member Is at the Heart of the Matter: On the Role of Membership Knowledge in Ethnomethodological Inquiry.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research31: 28–53.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wang, Wei
    2018 “Discourse Uses and Prosodic Properties of Ranhou in Spontaneous Mandarin Conversation.” Chinese Language and Discourse9 (1): 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, David Goodman, and Meng-Ying Lin
    2010 “Agreement, Acknowledgment, and Alignment: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Hao and Dui in Taiwan Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Studies12 (2): 241–267.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Weilenmann, Alexandra, and Gustav Lymer
    2014 “Incidental and Essential Objects in Interaction.” InInteracting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. byMaurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 319–337. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186.14wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.14wei [Google Scholar]
52. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
    2004 Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.117 [Google Scholar]
53. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina, and John Heritage
    2017 “Particles and Epistemics: Convergences and Divergences between English and Mandarin.” InStudies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. byGene H. Lerner, John Heritage, and Geoffrey Raymond, 273–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.273.14wu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.14wu [Google Scholar]
54. Xiong, Xiuzhen, and Lihong Quan
    2019 “Other-Repetitions in Mandarin Chinese: Functions and Responses.” East Asian Pragmatics4 (2): 217–238.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Xu, Jun
    2014 “Displaying status of recipiency through reactive tokens in Mandarin task-oriented interaction.” Journal of pragmatics741: 33–51.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Yang, Haiming, and Xiaolong Lu
    2016 “Tan Taiwan Kouyuci ‘Zheyangzi’ [On ‘Zheyangzi’ in Taiwan Mandarin].” Hanyu Xuebao531: 70–96.
    [Google Scholar]