1887
image of The language of ESG sustainability reports of Chinese listed companies
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Amid increasing global environmental concerns, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting has become standard practice for listed companies; few studies, however, analyzed Chinese ESG reports from an ecolinguistic perspective. This study employs quantitative corpus-assisted ecolinguistic methods to systematically compare vocabulary choices and discourse patterns in a corpus of 136 sustainability reports, further divided into two subcorpora — those issued by leading Chinese (public) companies by revenue (List A) and those aligned with Sustainable Development Goals criteria (List B). Results from combining keyword analysis and thematic clustering reveal diverging sustainability and political discourses across the two subcorpora, suggesting that commitment to SDGs and ownership influence language use. These variations center around two main poles, one driven by economy and State ideology (List A) and the other by a techno-oriented perspective (List B), reflecting the diverse approaches currently present in China’s sustainability arena.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24038.con
2025-09-01
2026-07-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alvesson, Mats
    2015The Triumph of Emptiness: Consumption, Higher Education, and Work Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambe, Modest N. C.
    2022 “Ignored, yet Important: An Ecolinguistic Analysis of Oral Narratives in the Western Grassfields of Cameroon.” Language & Ecology. Availablewww.ecoling.net
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul
    2023Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis (2nd edition). London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350083783
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350083783 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bondi, Marina, and Danni Yu
    2018 “The Generic Structure of CSR Reports: Dinamicity, Multimodality, Complexity and Recursivity.” InDiscourse, Communication and the Enterprise: When Business Meets Language, ed. byGiuliana Garzone, and Walter Giordano, –. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2019 “Textual Voices in Corporate Reporting: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Chinese, Italian, and American CSR Reports.” International Journal of Business Communication (): –. 10.1177/2329488418784690
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418784690 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brezina, Vaclav
    2018Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316410899
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brezina, Vaclav, and William Platt
    2023#LancsBox X [software]. Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. lancsbox.lancs.ac.uk
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brombal, Daniele, Pui Yiu Szeto, and Sergio Conti
    2023 “Unveiling the Language of Ideology in China’s Environmental Planning: Pilot Ecolinguistic Analysis of an Environmental Impact Assessment.” Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Orientale: –. 10.30687/AnnOr/2385‑3042/2023/01/018
    https://doi.org/10.30687/AnnOr/2385-3042/2023/01/018 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brombal, Daniele, Sergio Conti, and Pui Yiu Szeto
    2024 “Lexical Indicators for Chinese Language Ecological Discourse analysis: Design and Testing of a Novel Framework.” Language Sciences: . 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101634
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101634 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Shu, Xiaoyan Han, Zili Zhang, and Xuejun Zhao
    2023 “ESG Investment in China: Doing Well by Doing Good.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal: . 10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101907
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101907 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Simin, Yu Song., and Peng Gao
    2023 “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Financial Outcomes: Analyzing the Impact of ESG on Financial Performance.” Journal of Environmental Management: . 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cook, Guy, and Alison Sealey
    2018 “The Discursive Representation of Animals.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, ed. byAlwin F. Fill, and Hermine Penz, –. New York-Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cornwall, Andrea
    2007 “Buzzwords and Fuzzwords: Deconstructing Development Discourse.” Development in Practice (): –. 10.1080/09614520701469302
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469302 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cornwall, Andrea, and Karen Brock
    2005 “What do Buzzwords do for Development Policy? A Critical Look at ‘Participation’, ‘Empowerment’ and ‘Poverty Reduction’.” Third World Quarterly (): –. 10.1080/01436590500235603
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500235603 [Google Scholar]
  15. Díaz-Martínez, Elisa, and Elizabeth D. Gibbons
    2014 “The Questionable Power of Millennium Development Goal to Reduce Child Mortality.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities (): –. 10.1080/19452829.2013.864621
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.864621 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dobrin, Sidney I.
    2010 “Through Green Eyes: Complex Visual Culture and Post-Literacy.” Environmental Education Research (): –. 10.1080/13504621003715585
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13504621003715585 [Google Scholar]
  17. Eberhardt, Christopher
    2015 “Discourse on Climate Change in China: A Public Sphere without the Public.” China Information (): –. 10.1177/0920203X15571261
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X15571261 [Google Scholar]
  18. Eccles, Robert G., and Judith C. Stroehle
    2018 “Exploring Social Origins in the Construction of ESG Measures.” SSRN: . 10.2139/ssrn.3212685
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3212685 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fan, Junjun 范俊军
    2016a “Zhongguo binwei yuyan yousheng yudang shuju guize中国濒危语言有声语档数据规则 [Data standards of audio-visual documents of endangered languages in China].” Xibei Minzu Daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban)西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版) [Journal of Northwest Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences)] : –. 10.14084/j.cnki.cn62‑1185/c.2016.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.14084/j.cnki.cn62-1185/c.2016.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2016b “Zhongguo binwei yuyan ziran huayu zhuanxie guize (shi hang)中国濒危语言自然话语转写规则(试行) [Discourse transcription convention of Chinese endangered languages (craft)].” Jinan xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban)暨南学报(哲学社会科学版) [Jinan Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences] (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fill, Alwin F.
    2018 “Introduction.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Ecolingusitics, ed. byAlwin F. Fill, and Hermine Penz, –. New York-Abingdon: Routledge. 10.1017/9781108348935.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348935.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Filonchyk, Mikalai, Michael P. Peterson, Haowen Yan, Andrei Gusev, Lifeng Zhang, Yi He, and Shuwen Yang
    2024 “Greenhouse gas emissions and reduction strategies for the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitters.” Science of The Total Environment: –. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173895
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173895 [Google Scholar]
  23. Giese, Guido, Zoltan Nagy, and Linda-Eiling Lee
    2021 “Deconstructing ESG Ratings Performance: Risk and Return for E, S and G by Time Horizon, Sector and Weighting”. The Journal of Portfolio Management (): –. 10.3905/jpm.2020.1.198
    https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2020.1.198 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goron, Coraline
    2018 “Ecological Civilization and the Political Limits of a Chinese Concept of Sustainability.” China Perspectives: –. 10.4000/chinaperspectives.8463
    https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.8463 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gramsci, Antonio
    1948–51Quaderni dal carcere [Prison Notebooks]. Turin: Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Greenhalgh, Susan
    2008Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520941267
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520941267 [Google Scholar]
  27. Han, Dan, and Yu Zhao
    2021 “Research and Countermeasures on ESG Information Disclosure of Listed Enterprises in China Under the Background of Internet Technology.” 2021 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology (ICCSMT): –. 10.1109/ICCSMT54525.2021.00108
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSMT54525.2021.00108 [Google Scholar]
  28. Harré, Rom, Jens Brockmeir, and Peter Mühlhäusler
    1999Greenspeak: A Study of Environmental Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA-London-New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hu, Peng, Xuming Li, Nian Li, Yiying Wang, and Derek D. Wang
    2024 “Peeking into Corporate Greenwashing through the Readability of ESG Disclosures.” Sustainability (): . 10.3390/su16062571
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062571 [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, Guowen 黄国文
    2017a “Cong Xitong gongneng yuyanxue dao Shengtai yuyanxue从系统功能语言学到生态语言学 [From Systemic Functional Linguistics to Ecolinguistics].” Waiyu jiaoxue外语教学 [Foreign Language Education] (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2017b “Lun Shengtai huayu he xingwei fenxi de jiading he yuanze论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则 [One assumption and three principles for ecological analysis of discourse and behavior].” Waiyu jiaoxue yu yanjiu (waiguo yuwen shuangyuekan)外语教学与研究(外国语文双月刊) [Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly)] (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2018 “Cong Shengtai piping huayu fenxi dao Hexie huayu fenxi从生态批评话语分析到和谐话语分析 [From Eco-critical Discourse Analysis to Harmonious Discourse Analysis].” Zhongguo waiyu中国外语 [FLC] (): –. 10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672‑9382.2018.04.006
    https://doi.org/10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2018.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang, Guowen 黄国文 , and Ruihua Zhao 赵蕊华
    2017 “Shengtai huayu fenxi de yuanqi, mubiao, yuanze yu fangfa生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法 [On the origin, aims, principles and methodology of eco-discourse analysis].” Xiandai waiyu (shuangyuekan)现代外语(双月刊) [Modern Foreign Languages (Bimonthly)] (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, Guowen, and Ruihua Zhao
    2021 “Harmonious Discourse Analysis: Approaching Peoples’ Problems in a Chinese Context.” Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101365
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101365 [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang, Minyan
    2019 “Comparative Studies of Chinese & English Corporate ESG Reports and Revelations of CE Publicity Translation.” Frontiers in Educational Research (): –. 10.25236/FER.033015
    https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.033015 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hunt, Rachael
    2023 “Representations of Nature and Gender Roles in Little Red Riding Hood: An Ecolinguistic and Ecofeminist Discourse Analysis.” Language & Ecology. Availablewww.ecoling.net
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kassambara, Alboukadel, and Fabian Mundt
    2020 factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R package version 1.0.7. 10.32614/CRAN.package.factoextra
    https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.factoextra [Google Scholar]
  38. Kilgarriff, Adam
    2009 “Simple Maths for Keywords.” InProceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2009 (CL2009), ed. byMichaela Mahlberg, Victorina González Díaz, and Catherine Smith. University of Liverpool, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vit Suchomel
    2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On.” Lexicography: –. www.sketchengine.eu
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Levshina, Natalia
    2015How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lê, Sébastien, Julie Josse, and François Husson
    2008 “FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis.” Journal of Statistical Software (): –. 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01 [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, Jia, Sune V. Steffensen, and Guowen Huang
    2020 “Rethinking Ecolinguistics from a Distributed Language Perspective.” Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101277
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101277 [Google Scholar]
  43. Liao, Feimei, Yinghao Sun, and Shulin Xu
    2023 “Financial Report Comment Letters and Greenwashing in Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures: Evidence from China.” Energy Economics: . 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107122
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107122 [Google Scholar]
  44. Liao, Jinghua
    2023 “Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting System in China.” InHandbook of Chinese Management, ed. byCheck-Teck Foo, –. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑2459‑7_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2459-7_20 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin, Yuting
    2021 “Legitimation Strategies in Corporate Discourse: A Comparison of UK and Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility Reports.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mahlberg, Michaela
    2007 “Lexical Items in Discourse: Identifying Local Textual Functions of Sustainable Development.” InText, Discourse & Corpora: Theory and Analysis, ed. byMichael Hoey, Michaela Mahlberg, Michael Stubbs, and Wolfgang Teubert, –. London-New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Marko, Georg
    2000 “Go Veggie! A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Text for Vegetarian Beginners.” InECOnstructing Language, Nature and Society: The Ecolinguistic Project Revisited, ed. byBernhard Kettermann, and Hermine Penz, –. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Marquis, Christopher and Cuili Qian
    2014 “Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?” Organization Science (): –. 10.1287/orsc.2013.0837
    https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837 [Google Scholar]
  49. Matos, Pedro
    2020 “ESG and Responsible Institutional Investing around the World: A Critical Review.” CFA Institute Research Foundation Literature Reviews. 10.2139/ssrn.3668998
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668998 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mohajan, Haradhan
    2014 “Greenhouse Gas Emissions of China.” Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2001The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ng, Artie W., Tiffany Cheng Han Leung, Tao-Wang Yu, Charles H. Cho, and Tai Ming Wut
    2023 “Disparities in ESG Reporting by Rmerging Chinese Enterprises: Evidence from a Global Financial Center.” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal (): –. 10.1108/SAMPJ‑08‑2021‑0323
    https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2021-0323 [Google Scholar]
  53. Piao, Scott, Francesca Bianchi, Carmen Dayrell, Angela D’Egidio, and Paul Rayson
    2015 “Development of the Multilingual Semantic Annotation System.” InProceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL HLT 2015), ed. byRada Mihalcea, Joyce Chai, and Anoop Sarkar, –. Denver, Colorado: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/v1/N15‑1137
    https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/N15-1137 [Google Scholar]
  54. Poole, Robert
    2016 “A Corpus-Aided Ecological Discourse Analysis of the Rosemont Copper Mine Debate of Arizona, USA.” Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481316674775
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316674775 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2022Corpus-Assisted Ecolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350138582
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350138582 [Google Scholar]
  56. Posit team
    Posit team 2024RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. www.posit.co/
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Qu, Wen, and Junrui Zhang
    2023 “Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG), Life Cycle, and Firm Performance: Evidence from China.” Sustainability (): . 10.3390/su151814011
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su151814011 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rayner, Geof, David Barling, and Tim Lang
    2008 “Sustainable Food Systems in Europe: Policies, Realities and Futures.” Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition (): –. 10.1080/19320240802243209
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19320240802243209 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ren, Guowei
    2010 “An Overall Review of Linguistic Research on Genre.” Review of European Studies: –. 10.5539/res.v2n2p232
    https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v2n2p232 [Google Scholar]
  60. Schoenhals, Michael
    1992Doing Things with Words in Chinese Politics: Five Studies. University of California at Berkeley, Center for Chinese Studies, Berkeley, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Schwartz, Mark S., and Archie B. Carroll
    2008 “Integrating and Unifying Competing and Complementary Frameworks.” Business & Society (): –. 10.1177/0007650306297942
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650306297942 [Google Scholar]
  62. Scott, Mike, and Christopher Tribble
    2006Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
  63. Shen, Hongtao, Honghui Lin, Wenqi Han, and Huiying Wu
    2023 “ESG in China: A Review of Practice and Research, and Future Research Avenues.” China Journal of Accounting Research (): . 10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325 [Google Scholar]
  64. Steffensen, Sune V., and Alwin Fill
    2014 “Ecolinguistics: The State of the Art and Future Horizons.” Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stibbe, Arran
    2015Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Abingdon, UK-New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315718071
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718071 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2021Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By (2nd edition). Abingdon, UK-New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Termine, Costanza, and Daniele Brombal
    2018 “Ecological Civilisation for China’s Urban Sustainability: A Review of Normative Criteria.” Monde Chinois (): –. 10.3917/mochi.056.0059
    https://doi.org/10.3917/mochi.056.0059 [Google Scholar]
  68. Thampapillai, Dodo J., Xun Wu, and Lawrence R. Sunderaj
    2007 “Economic Growth, the Environment and Employment: Challenges for Sustainable Development in China.” International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment (): –. 10.1504/IJEWE.2007.015288
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2007.015288 [Google Scholar]
  69. Vallego, Jorge
    2023 “Ecolinguistics and AI: Integrating Eco-Awareness in Natural Language Processing.” Language & Ecology. Availablewww.ecoling.net
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Van Hoang, Thi Hong, Linh Pham, and Thanh Thi Phuong Nguyen
    2023 “Does country sustainability improve firm ESG reporting transparency? The moderating role of firm industry and CSR engagement.” Economic Modelling: . 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106351
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106351 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang, Guofeng
    2018 “A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting on China’s Air Pollution in the Official Chinese English-Language Press.” Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481318771431
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318771431 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wang, Ke-Liang, Bin Zhao, Li-Li Ding, and Zhuang Miao
    2021 “Government Intervention, Market Development, and Pollution Emission Efficiency: Evidence from China.” Science of the Total Environment: . 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143738
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143738 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang, Zhen, Ermin Chu, and Yukai Hao
    2024 “Towards Sustainable Development: How Does ESG Performance Promote Corporate Green Transformation.” International Review of Financial Analysis, . 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102982
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102982 [Google Scholar]
  74. Weber, Heloise
    2017 “Politics of ‘Leaving No One Behind’: Contesting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals Agenda.” Globalizations (): –. 10.1080/14747731.2016.1275404
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1275404 [Google Scholar]
  75. Weber, Olaf
    2014 “Environmental, Social and Governance Reporting in China.” Business Strategy and the Environment (): –. 10.1002/bse.1785
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785 [Google Scholar]
  76. West, Simon, L. Jamila Haider, Sanna Stålhammar, and Stephen Woroniecki
    2020 “A Relational Turn for Sustainability Science? Relational Thinking, Leverage Points and Transformations.” Ecosystems and People (): –. 10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417
    https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417 [Google Scholar]
  77. Wilson, Andrew, and Paul Rayson
    1993 “Automatic Content Analysis of Spoken Discourse.” InCorpus Based Computational Linguistics, ed. byClive Souter, and Eric Atwell, –. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653542_018
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653542_018 [Google Scholar]
  78. Xu, Jian, and Yan Sheng
    2023 “Regulations, Politics, and Firm Green Innovation.” Economic Analysis and Policy: –. 10.1016/j.eap.2023.07.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.07.014 [Google Scholar]
  79. Yu, Danni
    2020 “Corporate Environmentalism: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Chinese, American, and Italian Corporate Social Responsibility Reports.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (): –. 10.1109/TPC.2020.3012728
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2020.3012728 [Google Scholar]
  80. Yu, Danni, and Marina Bondi
    2017 “The Generic Structure of CSR Reports in Italian, Chinese, and English: A Corpus-Based Analysis.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (): –. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2702040
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2702040 [Google Scholar]
  81. 2019 “A Genre-Based Analysis of Forward-Looking Statements in Corporate Social Responsibility Reports.” Written Communication (): –. 10.1177/0741088319841612
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319841612 [Google Scholar]
  82. Yu, Ellen P.-Y., Bac Van Luu, and Catherine H. Chen
    2020 “Greenwashing in Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures.” Research in International Business and Finance: , 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192 [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhang, Yang, and Jingyuan Zhang
    2023 “Climate Change as Represented in Corporate Social Responsibility Reports of American and Chinese Energy Giants: A Critical Frame Analysis Perspective.” International Journal of Business Communication (): –. 10.1177/23294884231208176
    https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884231208176 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24038.con
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24038.con
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error