1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Chinese Language and Discourse
  4. Volume 17, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

As a linking element, ‘in sum, to sum up’ displays archaic qualities and is most commonly associated with formal written Chinese discourse. However, this paper demonstrates that can also be deployed in dialogic interactions in contemporary spoken Chinese to accomplish distinct social actions. Drawing on a variety of dialogic data, we identify a major distinction between tokens produced by the primary speaker and those produced by the respondent. Tokens from the primary speaker fall into three subcategories, corresponding to a person-based grouping: (1) first-person tokens are used to display the speaker’s affective stance toward the stated situation; (2) second-person tokens can address the interlocutor’s concerns; and (3) third-person tokens function primarily for informing and/or explaining. Although -prefaced turns by respondents are relatively rare, they are noteworthy for their role in transforming the participation framework with distinct interactional functions. Additionally, tokens are often associated with prosodic prominence and occur at points of conversation sequential transition. We offer a unified account of these diverse uses by linking them to some of the requirements of sequence closings in conversation. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of these findings for understanding lexical expressions of summarization, totality, and/or inclusivity. We emphasize that viewing grammar and social interaction as interdependent provides a productive framework for analyzing lexical tokens cutting across both written and spoken genres, as well as their variation within speech registers.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24040.liu
2025-08-29
2026-02-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cld.24040.liu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biq, Yung-O.
    1991 “The Multiple Uses of the Second Person Singular Pronoun Ni in Conversational Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics16 (4): 307–321. 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90084‑B
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90084-B [Google Scholar]
  2. Canavan, Ann, and George Zipperlen
    1996 Callfriend Mandarin Chinese–Mainland Dialect. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia. https://ca.talkbank.org/access/CallFriend/
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao, Xiuling, and Liu Liu
    2015 “Xiandai Hanyu Zongjielei Huayu Biaoji Qianxi [An Analysis of Modern Chinese Conclusive Markers].” Sinologia Hispanica11: 59–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Chafe, Wallace
    1987 “Cognitive constraints on information flow.” InCoherence and Grounding in Discourse, edited byRussel S. Tomlin, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha [Google Scholar]
  5. 1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Du Bois, John W., Susanna Cumming, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, and Danae Paolino
    1993 “Discourse transcription.” Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, 41.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Duranti, Alessandro, and Charles Goodwin
    1992 Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Francis, W. N., and H. Kučera
    1964 Manual of Information to Accompany a Standard Sample of Present-day Edited American English, for Use with Digital Computers. Providence, R.I.: Department of Linguistics, Brown University.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao, Hua, and Hongyin Tao
    2021 “Fanzheng ‘Anyway’ as a Discourse Pragmatic Particle in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Locus, and Interactional Function.” Journal of Pragmatics1731: 148–166. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    2006 “Participant, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences.” Text and Talk26 (4/5): 513–542.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
    2004 “Participation”. InA Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited byAlessandro Duranti, 222–243. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Heritage, John
    2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45 (1): 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  13. Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    2018 Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.31
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31 [Google Scholar]
  14. Labov, William and Joshua Waletzky
    1967 “Narrative analysis”. Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, edited byJ. Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Reprinted in Journal of Narrative and Life History71:3–38 1997.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2006 “On the Human ‘Interactional Engine’.” InRoots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited byN. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford: Berg.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, Feilu
    2008 “‘Zongzhi’ de Yuyi he Yuyong Gongneng Fenxi [Analyses of the Semantics and Pragmatics of ‘Zongzhi’].” Journal of Shiyan Technical Institute21 (1): 90–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lü, Shuxiang
    1980 Eight Hundred Words in Modern Chinese. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Park, Innhwa
    2010 “Marking an Impasse: The Use of Anyway as a Sequence-Closing Device.” Journal of Pragmatics421: 3283–3299. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Sacks, Harvey
    1972 “On the analyzability of stories by children.” InDirections in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, edited byJ. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, 325–345. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 1986 “Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations.” Peotics151: 127–138. 10.1016/0304‑422X(86)90036‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(86)90036-7 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation”. Language501, 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  23. Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Sacks, Harvey
    1973 “Opening up closings.” Semiotica8(4): 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  24. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2009 “Doing actions with identity categories.” Text and Talk29(1): 75–97. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Su, Dan
    2019 The M. Chinese Video Corpus (MCVC). UCLA, Los Angeles and University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tao, Hongyin
    1996 Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.5 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2024 “An interactional approach to generic second person expressions in Mandarin conversation.” In(Non)referentiality in Conversation, edited byMichael C. Ewing and Ritva Laury, 167–202. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.344.09tao
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.344.09tao [Google Scholar]
  28. Tao, Hongyin, and Hua Gao
    2022 “Fanzheng ‘Anyway’ as a Mitigator in Adversity in Mandarin Conversation.” Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [Language Research and Teaching] 216 (4): 68–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Tao, Hongyin, and Richard Xiao
    2007/2020 The UCLA Corpus of Written Chinese. Los Angeles: UCLA; Lancaster: UCREL.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, Hong, and Mingsheng Lü
    2015 “Wenben Zhong ‘Zongzhi (Zongeryanzhi)’ Xinxi Suoyin Gongneng Fenxi [Analyses of the Information-Indexing Function of ‘Zongzhi’ in Texts].” Research on Library Science65–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu, Haiping
    2015 “Encoding subjectivity with totality: A corpus-based study of [zhengge yi (CL)+X] in Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics831: 27–40. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wu, Haiping, and Hongyin Tao
    2018 “Expressing (inter)subjectivity with universal quantification: A pragmatic account of Plural NP + dou expressions in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics1281, 1–21. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Yu, Guodong, Yaqiong Wu, Paul Drew, and Chase W. Raymond
    2024 “The DIG Mandarin Conversations (DMC) Corpus: Mundane Telephone Calls in Mandarin Chinese as Resources for Research and Teaching.” Chinese Language and Discourse15 (1): 105–141. 10.1075/cld.23001.guo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.23001.guo [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24040.liu
Loading
More than a summarizing conjunction
Chinese Language and Discourse 17, 1 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.24040.liu
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24040.liu
/content/journals/10.1075/cld.24040.liu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): closing device; genres; in sum; inclusivity; linking; summarizing; totality; zongzhi

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error