Modeling scalar implicature processing in Mandarin

References

1. Bach, Kent
   1998 “Standardization Revisited.” InPragmatics: Critical Concepts, ed. byAsa Kasher, 712–722. London: Routeledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bach, Kent
   2012 “Context dependence (such as it is).” InThe Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. byManuel Garcia-Carpintero, and Max Kölbel, 153–184. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
   1992 “How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle.” Linguistics and Philosophy151: 93–110. 10.1007/BF00635834
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635834 [Google Scholar]
4. Bain, Lee J., and Max Engelhardt
   1992 Introduction to Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 2nd ed. Belmont: Duxbury Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baker, Rachel, Ryan Doran, Yaron McNabb, Meredith Larson, and Gregory Ward
   2009 “On the Non-unified Nature of Scalar Implicature: An Empirical Investigation.” International Review of Pragmatics1 (2): 211–248. 10.1163/187730909X12538045489854
   https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489854 [Google Scholar]
6. Beltrama, Andrea, and Ming Xiang
   2013 “Is ‘Good’ Better Than ‘Excellent’? An Experimental Investigation on Scalar Implicatures and Gradable Adjectives.” Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung171: 81–98.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bezuidenhout, Anne, and J. Cooper Cutting
   2002 “Literal Meaning, Minimal Propositions, and Pragmatic Processing.” Journal of Pragmatics34 (4): 433–456. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00042‑X
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00042-X [Google Scholar]
8. Bott, Lewis, and Emmanuel Chemla
   2016 “Shared and Distinct Mechanisms in Deriving Linguistic Enrichment.” Journal of Memory and Language911: 117–140. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.004 [Google Scholar]
9. Bott, Lewis, and Ira A. Noveck
   2004 “Some Utterances are Underinformative: The Onset and Time Course of Scalar Inferences.” Journal of Memory and Language51 (3): 437–457. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.006
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.006 [Google Scholar]
10. Breheny, Richard, Napoleon Katsos, and John Williams
    2006 “Are Generalised Scalar Implicatures Generated by Default? An On-line Investigation Into the Role of Context in Generating Pragmatic Inferences.” Cognition100 (3): 434–463. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.003 [Google Scholar]
11. Carston, Robyn
    1998 “Informativeness, Relevance and Scalar Implicature.” InRelevance Theory: Applications and Implications, ed. byRobyn Carston, and Seiji Uchida, 179–238. Amsterdam: Benjamins, Amsterdam. 10.1075/pbns.37.11car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.37.11car [Google Scholar]
12. Chiang, Chia-Ling
    2016 “A Comparative Analysis of the Semantic Meaning Patterns of ‘OR’ in Physics Texts in English and Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of Educational Practice and Research29 (2): 33–64.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chierchia, Gennaro
    2004 “Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface.” InStructures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol.31, ed. byAdriana Belletti, 39–103. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
14. Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox, and Benjamin Spector
    2013 “The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship Between Semantics and Pragmatics.” InSemantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Vol.31, ed. byClaudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 2297–2332. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cook, Jiyon
    2014 “Context, Expectation and Conversational Implicature: A Pragmatic Analysis of Good.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies4 (5): 857–864. 10.4304/tpls.4.5.857‑864
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.5.857-864 [Google Scholar]
16. Doran, Ryan, Gregory Ward, Meredith Larson, Yaron McNabb, and Rachel E. Baker
    2012 “A Novel Experimental Paradigm for Distinguishing Between What is Said and What is Implicated.” Language88 (1): 124–154. 10.1353/lan.2012.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0008 [Google Scholar]
17. Dorjee, Dusana, Merrill F. Garrett, and Robert M. Harnish
    2013 “Mandatory Processing of Implied Content: Lessons From Context Effects on Implictures.” International Review of Pragmatics5 (2): 217–232. 10.1163/18773109‑13050204
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-13050204 [Google Scholar]
18. Feeney, Aidan, Susan Scrafton, Amber Duckworth, and Simon J. Handley
    2004 “The Story of Some: Everyday Pragmatic Inference by Children and Adults.” Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology58 (2): 121–132. 10.1037/h0085792
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085792 [Google Scholar]
19. Garrett, Merrill, and Robert M. Harnish
    2007 “Experimental Pragmatics: Testing for Implicitures.” Pragmatics and Cognition15 (1): 65–90. 10.1075/pc.15.1.07gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.07gar [Google Scholar]
20. Gotzner, Nicole, Stephanie Solt, and Anton Benz
    2018 “Scalar Diversity, Negative Strengthening, and Adjectival Semantics.” Frontiers in Psychology91: 1659. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01659
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01659 [Google Scholar]
21. Grice, H. Paul
    1968 “Utterer’s Meaning, Sentence Meaning and Word Meaning.” Foundations of Language41: 225–242. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2727‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2727-8_2 [Google Scholar]
22. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In: Syntax and Semantics. Vol.31, ed. byPeter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Grice, H. Paul
    1981 “Presupposition and Conversational Implicature.” InRadical Pragmatics, ed. byPeter Cole, 183–197. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Grodner, Daniel J., Natalie M. Klein, Kathleen M. Carbary, and Michael K. Tanenhaus
    2010 “‘Some,’ and Possibly All, Scalar Inferences are Not Delayed: Evidence for Immediate Pragmatic Enrichment.” Cognition116 (1): 42–55. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014 [Google Scholar]
25. Horn, Laurence R.
    1972 “On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English.” Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
26. Horn, Laurence R.
    1984 “Towards a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-and R-based Implicature.” InMeaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. byDeborah Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Horn, Laurence R.
    1989 A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hu, Shenai, Peng Zhou, Francesca Foppolo, Maria Vender, and Denis Delfitto
    2019 “Scalar Implicatures in Chinese Children With Reading Difficulties.” First Language39 (5): 479–507. 10.1177/0142723719845181
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723719845181 [Google Scholar]
29. Huang, Yi Ting, and Jesse Snedeker
    2018 “Some Inferences Still Take Time: Prosody, Predictability, and the Speed of Scalar Implicatures.” Cognitive Psychology1021: 105–126. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.01.004 [Google Scholar]
30. Katsos, Napoleon, Richard Breheny, and John Williams
    2005 “Interaction of Structural and Contextual Constraints During the On-Line Generation of Scalar Inferences.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society271: 1108–1113.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kennedy, Christopher
    2007 “Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives.” Linguistics and Philosophy301: 1–45. 10.1007/s10988‑006‑9008‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0 [Google Scholar]
32. Kennedy, Christopher, and Louise McNally
    2005 “Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates.” Language81 (2): 345–381. 10.1353/lan.2005.0071
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071 [Google Scholar]
33. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1987 “Minimization and Conversational Inference.” InThe Pragmatic Perspective, ed. byJef Verschueren, and Marcella Bertuccelli Papi, 61–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbcs.5.10lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.10lev [Google Scholar]
34. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000 Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
35. Lin, Jingxia, and Jeeyong Peck
    2016 “Classification of Mandarin Chinese Simple Adjectives: A Scale-based Analysis of Their Quantitative Denotations.” Language and Linguistics17 (6): 827–855.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Liu, Si, and Jianan Liu
    2017 “Processing Scalar Implicatures in Mandarin Chinese: Testing the Processing Models.” International Journal of Linguistics9 (3): 115–136. 10.5296/ijl.v9i3.11432
    https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v9i3.11432 [Google Scholar]
37. Liu, Si, and Yi Yang
    2017 “Cognitive Processing of Scalar Implicatures With Chinese Gradable Adjectives.” Pragmatics and Cognition24 (3): 373–403. 10.1075/pc.17036.liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17036.liu [Google Scholar]
38. Lü, Shuxiang
    (ed) 1980 Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Luo, Qiongpeng
    2018 “Gradability, Scale Structure and Classification of Simple Adjectives in Chinese.” Chinese Language Learning (1): 27–38.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Morzycki, Marcin
    2012 “Adjectival Extremeness: Degree Modification and Contextually Restricted Scales.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory301: 567–609. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9162‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9162-0 [Google Scholar]
41. Notley, Anna, Peng Zhou, Britta Jensen, and Stephen Crain
    2012 “Children’s Interpretation of Disjunction in the Scope of ‘Before’: A Comparison of English and Mandarin.” Journal of Child Language39 (3): 482–522. 10.1017/S0305000911000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000092 [Google Scholar]
42. Noveck, Ira A.
    2001 “When Children are More Logical Than Adults: Experimental Investigations of Scalar Implicature.” Cognition78 (2): 165–188. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(00)00114‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00114-1 [Google Scholar]
43. Noveck, Ira A., and Andres Posada
    2003 “Characterizing the Time Course of an Implicature: An Evoked Potentials Study.” Brain and Language85 (2): 203–210. 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00053‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00053-1 [Google Scholar]
44. Papafragou, Anna, and Julien Musolino
    2003 “Scalar Implicatures: Experiments at the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface.” Cognition86 (3): 253–282. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00179‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00179-8 [Google Scholar]
45. Politzer-Ahles, Stephen, and E. Matthew Husband
    2018 “Eye Movement Evidence for Context-sensitive Derivation of Scalar Inferences.” Collabra: Psychology4 (1): 3. 10.1525/collabra.100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.100 [Google Scholar]
46. Rees, Alice, and Lewis Bott
    2018 “The Role of Alternative Salience in the Derivation of Scalar Implicatures.” Cognition1761: 1–14. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.024 [Google Scholar]
47. Roberts, Craige
    1996/2012 “Information Structure: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics.” Semantics and Pragmatics51: 6.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ronai, Eszter, and Ming Xiang
    2021 “Pragmatic Inferences are QUD-sensitive: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Linguistics57 (4): 841–870. 10.1017/S0022226720000389
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000389 [Google Scholar]
49. Sauerland, Uli
    2012 “The Computation of Scalar Implicatures: Pragmatic, Lexical or Grammatical?” Language and Linguistics Compass6 (1): 36–49. 10.1002/lnc3.321
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.321 [Google Scholar]
50. Sbisà, Marina
    2006 “After Grice: Neo-and Post-perspectives.” Journal of Pragmatics38 (12): 2223–2234. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.007 [Google Scholar]
51. Shi, Yuzhi
    2003 The Effect of the Quantity Properties of Adjectives on Their Syntactic Behaviors. Chinese Teaching in the World (2): 13–26.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Skordos, Dimitrios, and Anna Papafragou
    2016 “Children’s Derivation of Scalar Implicatures: Alternatives and Relevance.” Cognition1531: 6–18. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.006 [Google Scholar]
53. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Starr, Glenn, and Jacee Cho
    2022 “QUD Sensitivity in the Computation of Scalar Implicatures in Second Language Acquisition.” Language Acquisition29 (2): 182–197. 10.1080/10489223.2021.1990930
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2021.1990930 [Google Scholar]
55. Su, Yi Esther
    2013 “Scalar Implicatures and Downward Entailment in Child Mandarin.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics22 (2): 167–187. 10.1007/s10831‑012‑9101‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9101-z [Google Scholar]
56. Su, Yi Esther
    2014 “The Acquisition of Logical connectives in Child Mandarin.” Language Acquisition21 (2): 119–155. 10.1080/10489223.2014.884568
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.884568 [Google Scholar]
57. Su, Yi Esther, and Yuhan Jiang
    2024 “Challenges With Computing Scalar and Ad-hoc Implicatures in Mandarin-speaking 4–8-year-old Autistic Children.” Journal of Communication Disorders1101: 106427. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106427
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106427 [Google Scholar]
58. Su, Yi Esther, and Lin-Yan Su
    2015 “Interpretation of Logical Words in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Uncovering Knowledge of Semantics and Pragmatics.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders451: 1938–1950. 10.1007/s10803‑014‑2350‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2350-0 [Google Scholar]
59. Tomlinson Jr., John M., Todd M. Bailey, and Lewis Bott
    2013 “Possibly All of That and Then Some: Scalar Implicatures are Understood in Two Steps.” Journal of Memory and Language69 (1): 18–35. 10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.003 [Google Scholar]
60. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
    2003 “Three types of existential quantification in Chinese.” InForm, Interpretation and Functional Structure: Perspectives from Asian Languages, ed. byAudrey Li, and Andrew Simpson, 161–179. London: Curzon/Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
    2004 “On ‘you ren’, ‘you de ren’ and ‘you xie ren’.” Chinese Linguistics (2): 16–25.
    [Google Scholar]
62. van Tiel, Bob, Emiel van Miltenburg, Natalia Zevakhina, and Bart Geurts
    2016 “Scalar Diversity.” Journal of Semantics33 (1): 137–175.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Wilson, Deirdre
    2017 “Relevance Theory.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byYan Huang, 79–100. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.25
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.25 [Google Scholar]
64. Yang, Xiao, Utako Minai, and Robert Fiorentino
    2018 “Context-sensitivity and Individual Differences in the Derivation of Scalar Implicature.” Frontiers in Psychology91: 1720. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01720
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01720 [Google Scholar]
65. Zhang, Jun, and Yan Wu
    2020 “Only Youxie Think it is a Nice Thing to Say: Interpreting Scalar Items in Face-threatening Contexts by Native Chinese Speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics1681: 19–35. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.008 [Google Scholar]
66. Zondervan, Arjen J.
    2010 “Scalar Implicatures or Focus: An Experimental Approach.” Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.