Re-evaluating the dynamics of subjectification, intersubjectification, and textualization from a constructional perspective

References

1. Aijmer, K.
   2002 English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.10
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.10 [Google Scholar]
2. Andersen, Henning
   2001 Actualization and the (uni)directionality. InHenning Andersen, ed., Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress, 225–248. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.219.11and
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219.11and [Google Scholar]
3. Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea
   eds. 2015 Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
4. Blom, A. and Daalder, S.
   1977 Syntaktische theorie en taalbeschrijving. Muiderberg: Coutinho.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brinton, L. J.
   2017 The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316416013
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416013 [Google Scholar]
6. Bybee, Joan
   2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
7. Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
   2000 Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing. InS. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp.56–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Croft, W.
   2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. Declerck, R.
   1988 Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press. 10.1515/9783110869330
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869330 [Google Scholar]
10. De Smet, H.
    2016 How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change28.11:83–102. 10.1017/S0954394515000186
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000186 [Google Scholar]
11. Feng, G.
    2008 Pragmatic markers in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics401:1687–1718. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.012 [Google Scholar]
12. Fischer, O.
    2007 Morphosyntactic change: functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fraser, B.
    1996 Pragmatic Markers. Pragmatics61: 167–190.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fraser, B.
    2006 Towards a theory of discourse markers. InKerstin Fischer, ed., Approaches to Discourse Particles. North Holland: Elsevier, pp.189–204. 10.1163/9780080461588_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_012 [Google Scholar]
15. Fraser, B.
    2009 An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics11: 293–320. 10.1163/187730909X12538045489818
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489818 [Google Scholar]
16. Fried, M.
    2008 Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. InAlexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald, eds., Constructions and Language Change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211757.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211757.47 [Google Scholar]
17. Goldberg, A. E.
    2006 Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haselow, A.
    2019 Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics1461: 1–18. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.003 [Google Scholar]
19. Harris, A. and Campbell, L.
    1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Heine, B.
    2013 On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?Linguistics51.61:1205–1247. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048 [Google Scholar]
21. Hüning, M. and Booij, G.
    2014 From compounding to derivation:The rise of derivational affixes through constructionalization. InFerdinand von Mengden and Horst Simon, eds., special issue on Refining Grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica48.21:579–604.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Patten, A.
    2012 The English IT-cleft: a constructional account and a diachronic investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Petré, Peter
    2014 Constructions and Environments: Copular, Passive, and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Rhee, S.
    2012 Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: The case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences, 34.3: 284–300.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Schiffrin, D.
    (1987) Discourse markers (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 5)Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Shi, J. and Hu, X.
    2013 Jiushi de huayu biaoji gongneng jiqi yufahua [Functions of jiushi as a Discourse Marker and Its Grammaticalization]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 41:13–20.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Smirnova, E.
    2015 Constructionalization and constructional change: The role of context in the development of constructions. InBarðdal , eds., 81–106. 10.1075/cal.18.03smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.03smi [Google Scholar]
28. Sun, C.
    2006 Chinese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Tantucci, V.
    2017 From immediate to extended intersubjectification: A gradient approach to intersubjective awareness and semasiological change. Language and Cognition, 9:1: 88–120.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Traugott, E.
    1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. InLehmann, P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics (p.245–271). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
31. Traugott, E.
    1995 Subjectification in grammaticalization. InDieter Stein and Susan Wright, eds., Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 31–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
32. Traugott, E.
    2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. InKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, eds., Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
33. Traugott, E.
    2021 A constructional perspective on the rise of metatextual discourse markers”. Cadernos de Linguistica2.11:1–25. 10.25189/2675‑4916.2021.v2.n1.id269
    https://doi.org/10.25189/2675-4916.2021.v2.n1.id269 [Google Scholar]
34. Traugott, E.
    2022 Discourse structuring markers in English: A historical constructionalist perspective on pragmatics. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.33 [Google Scholar]
35. Traugott, E. and Trousdale, G.
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
36. Zhan, F. and Sun, C.
    2013 A Copula Analysis of shì in the Chinese Cleft Construction. Language and Linguistics, 14.41: 755–7.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Zhan, F. and Traugott, E.
    2019 The development of the Chinese copula shì construction: A diachronic constructional perspective. Functions of Language, 26.21: 139–176. 10.1075/fol.16001.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16001.zha [Google Scholar]
38. Zhan, F. and Sun, C.
    2022 The development of the Chinese discourse marker and expressive wanle. Journal of Pragmatics, 1891: 37–54. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.008 [Google Scholar]
39. Zhan, F.
    2022 A constructional account of the development of the Chinese stance discourse marker běnlái. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 23.2: 245–284. 10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha [Google Scholar]
40. Zhan, F. and Pan, H.
    2023 The development of the Chinese V de O cleft construction: a constructional approach. Studies in Language, 47.21: 318–349. 10.1075/sl.21071.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21071.zha [Google Scholar]
41. Zhan, W., Guo, R. and Chen, Y.
    2003 The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century B.C. — present. ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus
    [Google Scholar]
42. Zhang, Y.
    2002 Jiushi de pianzhang xianjie gongneng jiqi yufahua licheng [The coherent functions of jiushi in text and the evolution of its grammaticalization]. Shijie Hanyu jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World] 31:80–90.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Zhang, W. and Gao, H.
    2012 Ziran huihuazhong jiushi de huayu gongneng yu yufahua yanjiu [Functions of jiushi in everyday conversation and its grammaticalization]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 11: 91–98.
    [Google Scholar]