漢語約量詞實證研究—以「來」與「多」為例 [An Empirical Study on Approximators lai and duo in Mandarin]

References

1. Blutner, Reinhard
   2000 “Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation.” Journal of Semantics (): –. 10.1093/jos/17.3.189
   https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/17.3.189 [Google Scholar]
2. Channell, Joanna Mary
   1983 Vague Language: Some Vague Expressions in English. Doctoral dissertation. York: University of York.
3. Chao, Yuen-Ren
   1979 Hanyu Kouyu Yufa [A grammar of spoken Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chen, Wei-yu, and Siaw-Fong Chung
   2017 “Fanyici ‘duo’ he ‘shao’ zai shu liang ming jiegou zhong de bu duicheng xian xiang — yi yuliaoku weiben de fenxi [The Asymmetric Occurrences of Dou1 and Shao3 in the [Numeral+Measure Word/Classifier] Construction: A Corpus-based Analysis].” Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing (): –.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coupland, Nikolas
   2011 “How Frequent Are Numbers?” Language & Communication (): –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2010.09.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2010.09.001 [Google Scholar]
6. Cummins, Chris, Uli Sauerland, and Stephanie Solt
   2012 “Granularity and Scalar Implicature in Numerical Expressions.” Linguistics and Philosophy: –. 10.1007/s10988‑012‑9114‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9114-0 [Google Scholar]
7. Curtin, Paul Bartholomew
   1995 Prolegomena to a Theory of Granularity. Doctoral dissertation. Texas: University of Texas at Austin.
8. Dehaene, Stanislas, and Jacques Mehler
   1992 “Cross-Linguistic Regularities in the Frequency of Number Words.” Cognition (): –. 10.1016/0010‑0277(92)90030‑L
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90030-L [Google Scholar]
9. Ding, Shengshu
   1961 Xiandai Hanyu Yufa Jianghua. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Grice, Herbert Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, ed. byP. Cole, and J. Morgan, –. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Guo, Xiao-wei
    2017 “Xiandai hanyu ‘yueliang’ biaoda de yuyi texing yu yuyong gongneng [A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis of Approximate Quantity in Modern Chinese].” Science Economy Society: –.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hamawand, Zeki
    2017 “The Notion of Approximation in Language: A Construal-Based Analysis.” Cognitive Semantics (): –. 10.1163/23526416‑00301004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00301004 [Google Scholar]
13. Han, Xiaoming
    2017 “Gaishu zhuci ‘lai’ he ‘duo’ de fenbu.” Journal of Liaoning Educational Administration Institute: –.
    [Google Scholar]
14. He, Chuansheng, Lifang Deng, and Lili Xie
    2001 “Gaishu zhuci ‘duo’ de xingshi jufa he xingshi yuyi [A Formal Syntax and Semantics of the Particle for Numerical Approximation ‘Duo’].” Contemporary Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
15. He, Chuansheng, and One-Soon Her
    2022 “Complex Numerals in English: Constituents or Not?” English Language & Linguistics (): –. 10.1017/S1360674321000447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000447 [Google Scholar]
16. Her, One-Soon, and Chen-Tien Hsieh
    2010 “On the Semantic Distinction between Classifiers and Measure Words in Chinese.” Language and Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Her, One-Soon
    2012 “Distinguishing Classifiers and Measure Words: A Mathematical Perspective and Implications.” Lingua (): –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012 [Google Scholar]
18. Hofland, Knut, and Stig Johansson
    1982 Word Frequencies in British and American English. Oslo: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Horn, Laurence R.
    1984 “Towards a New Taxonomy of Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature.” InMeaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. byDeborah Schiffrin, –. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hu, Yushu
    2011 Xiandai Hanyu. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Huang, Yu-Jui, Yun-Han Wang, and Huichen S. Hsiao
    2024 “An Empirical Study on Approximators jǐ and duō in Mandarin.” InWorkshop on Chinese Lexical Semantics (CLSW 2024), eds. byPeng Jin, Qi Su, and Jia-Fei Hong, –. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jansen, Carel J., and Mathijs M. W. Pollmann
    2001 “On Round Numbers: Pragmatic Aspects of Numerical Expressions.” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics (): –. 10.1076/jqul.8.3.187.4095
    https://doi.org/10.1076/jqul.8.3.187.4095 [Google Scholar]
23. Krifka, Manfred
    2002 “Be Brief and Vague! And How Bidirectional Optimality Theory Allows for Verbosity and Precision.” InSounds and Systems: Studies in Structure and Change. A Festschrift for Theo Vennemann, ed. byDavid Restle, and Dietmar Zaefferer, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110894653.439
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894653.439 [Google Scholar]
24. Krifka, Manfred
    2007 Approximate Interpretation of Number Words. Doctoral dissertation. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philosophische Fakultät II.
25. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
26. Li, Yuming
    2000 Hanyu Liang Fanchou Yanjiu. Hubei: Central China Normal University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Li, Xingjian
    2004 Xiandai Hanyu Guifan Cidian. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Liu, Yuehua, Wenyu Pan, and Wei Gu
    1983 Shiyong Xiandai Hanyu Yufa [Practical Modern Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Liu, Jian, Lansheng Jiang, Weiguo Bai, and Guangshun Cao
    1992 Jindai Hanyu Xuci Yanjiu. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Liu, Cun-wei
    2018 “Renzhi yufa shijiao xia de ‘lai’-zi gaishu jiegou yanjiu [On the Approximate Structure with ‘Lai’ from the Perspective of Cognitive Grammar].” Journal of Foreign Languages: –.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Liu, Qi
    2018 “Ye tan gaishu jiegou ‘lai’ de xingyi texing — yi ‘shi jin lai zhong’ he ‘shi lai jin zhong’ weili [The Auxiliary Approximate Numeral ‘Lai’: With Reference of ‘Shi Jing Lai Zhong’ and ‘Shi Lai Jing Zhong’].” Modern Chinese: –. 10.1186/s13020‑018‑0211‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-018-0211-z [Google Scholar]
32. Liu, Jun
    2022 “‘Ji, duo, lai’ biao yueliang de chayi yu jiaoxue sikao [Difference Comparison of ‘Ji, Duo, Lai’ and Reflections on Teaching].” Chinese Language Learning: –.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lü, Shuxiang
    1984 Hanyu Yufa Lunwenji. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lü, Shuxiang
    1985 Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolue. Taipei: The Liberal Arts Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lü, Shuxiang
    1999 Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Luo, Qiongpeng
    2019 “‘Duo’ zai shuliang jiegou zhong de fenbu yu yuyi jieshi — jian tan celiang de jizhi [The Distribution and Interpretation of ‘Duo’ in Quantity Expression and the Grammar of Measurement].” Study in Language and Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ma, Biao, and Daxin Wang
    2002 “Shuliangci hou de ‘lai’ biaoshi duoshao — ye cong ‘wushi laisui’ tanqi.” Chinese Language Learning: –.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Nguyen, Huy Anh, Jake M. Hofman, and Daniel G. Goldstein
    2022 “Round Numbers Can Sharpen Cognition.” InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ed. bySimone Barbosa, Cliff Lampe, Caroline Appert, David A. Shamma, Steven Drucker, Julie Williamson, and Koji Yatani, –. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/3491102.3501852
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501852 [Google Scholar]
39. Parikh, Prashant
    2001 “Communication, Meaning and Interpretation.” Linguistics and Philosophy: –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Peng, Yulan
    2007 Xiandai Hanyu Yueliang Biaoda ji Xiangguan Wenti Yanjiu. Master’s thesis. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rosch, Eleanor
    1975 “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General(): –. 10.1037/0096‑3445.104.3.192
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 [Google Scholar]
42. Rui, Jingying, and Jiafei Hong
    2022 “Jinyi gaishu ci ‘duo’ yu ‘ji’ de jufa jiegou tanwei.” Sinogram Culture: –.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sauerland, Uli, and Penka Stateva
    2011 “Two Types of Vagueness.” InVagueness and Language Use, eds. byPaul Égré, and Nathan Klinedinst, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230299313_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299313_6 [Google Scholar]
44. Solt, Stephanie, Chris Cummins, and Marijan Palmović
    2017 “The Preference for Approximation.” International Review of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1163/18773109‑00901010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00901010 [Google Scholar]
45. Wang, Gaigai
    2001 “Gaishuci ‘lai’ de yuyi diaocha he yanjiu.” Chinese Language Learning: –.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wang, hui
    2015 “Yueliang zhuci ‘duo’ qiantan.” Journal of Jilin Radio and TV University: –.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wang, Jiaming, and Siming Luo
    2018 “‘Lai/ba zi shuliang (ming) xing guliang goushi’ ‘shu’ zhiyue duibi yanjiu.” Journal of Hubei Engineering University (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Xing, Fu-yi
    2007 “Shuo ‘san’.” Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University: –.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Xing, Fu-yi
    2011 “Shishi zhongpan: ‘lai’-zi gaishu jiegou xingyi bianzheng [Language Facts as the Ultimate Criterion: Dialectical Analysis on the Formal and Semantic Characteristics of Approximate Structure with ‘Lai’].” Studies in Language and Linguistics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Yang, Defeng
    1993 “Biaoshi gaishu de ‘duo’ yu ‘lai’ de quan fangwei kaocha.” Chinese Language Learning: –.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Yang, Defeng
    2008 Ribenren Xue Hanyu Changjian Yufa Cuowu Shiyi. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Yao, Dehuai
    1997 “‘Wushi laisui’ he ‘jiri’.” Ciku Jianshe Tongxun: .
    [Google Scholar]
53. Ying, Xue-feng, and Xiao-hui Wang
    2014 “Shuliang jiegou zhong gaishuci ‘lai’ he ‘duo’ de fenbu [The Distribution of Approximate Numbers ‘Lai’ and ‘Duo’ in Numeral-Classifier Structure].” Chinese Language Learning: –.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Zhang, Yi-sheng
    2002 “Gaishu zhuci ‘lai’ he ‘duo’ [On the Auxiliary Words of the Approximate Number ‘Lai’ and ‘Duo’].” Journal of Jiangsu Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Zhu, Dexi
    1982 Yufa Jiangyi. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Zong, Shihai, and Luchang, Zhang
    2008 “Hanyu liang daici ‘duo’ de yongfa ji qijie shi [The usage and explanation of the Chinese quantity-representing pronoun ‘duo’].” Foreign Language Teaching and Research (): –.
    [Google Scholar]