1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper is based on an investigation of the Five Phases (五行, ) in traditional Chinese thought within a cognitive linguistic framework. In analyzing three of the five concepts in the scheme, namely WOOD (木, ), EARTH (土, ) and METAL (金, ), as recorded in ancient and modern Chinese, we attempt to find out (1) the conceptual metonymies and metaphors they have developed, (2) the similarities and differences between the three concepts in ancient and modern Chinese, and (3) the possible reasons for those similarities and differences and the implications they have for ancient and modern Chinese ways of cognizing the world. Our comparative analysis shows that while the semantic networks of the three concepts remain largely consistent from ancient to modern Chinese, those conceptual metaphors which are closely tied to the scheme are much less active in modern Chinese. On the whole it can be claimed that the ancient Chinese believed in the unity of Heaven and human and constructed the world based on three fundamental conceptual metaphors: “nature operates in accordance with ”, “THE HUMAN BODY OPERATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ” and “SOCIETY OPERATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ”. Yet it seems that this belief in the unity of Heaven and human has weakened in the modern Chinese mind and modern Chinese people no longer rely on the scheme to understand the world.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.7.1.03lan
2016-09-19
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barcelona, Antonio
    2000 “Introduction: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Metonymy”. InMetaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspectiveed. by A. Barcelona , 1–30. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2002 “Clarifying and Applying the Notions of Metaphor and Metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An Update”. InMetaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast ed. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings , 207–277. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao, Xueqin , and E. Gao
    2001A Dream of Red Mansions. Translated by X. Yang & G. Yang . Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, William
    2002 “The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies”. InMetaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrasted. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings , 161–205. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dirven, René
    2002 “Metonymy and Metaphor: Different Mental Strategies of Conceptualization”. InMetaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrasted. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings , 75–111. Berlin, Germany/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans, Vyvyan , and Melanie Green
    2006Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibbs, Raymond W
    1996 “What’s Cognitive about Cognitive Linguistics?” InCognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguisticsed. by E.H. Casad , 27–54. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goossens, Louis
    2002 “Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action”. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrasted. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings , 349–377. Berlin, Germany / New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kövecses, Zoltan
    2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lakoff, George
    1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. InMetaphor and Thoughted. by A. Ortony , 202–251. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  13. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, George , and Mark Turner
    1989More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Legge, James
    (trans) 1963The I Ching: The Book of Changes. New York, NY: Dover Publicaitons.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (trans) 1992The Four Books. Changsha: Hunan Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Littlejohn, Ronnie
    2012 “Wuxing (Wu-hsing)”. InInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophyed. by J. Feiser and B. Dowden . Retrieved March 10, 2015 from the World Wide Web: www.iep.utm.edu/wuxing.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Luo, Jingguo
    (trans) 2005A Selection of Classical Chinese Essays from Guwenguanzhi. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nie, Yaning , and Rong Chen
    2008 “Water Metaphors and Metonymies in Chinese: A Semantic Network”. Pragmatics & Cognition16: 492–516. doi: 10.1075/pc.16.3.04nie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.3.04nie [Google Scholar]
  21. Radden, Günter
    2002 “How Metonymic Are Metaphors”. InMetaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrasted. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings , 407–434. Berlin, Germany / New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Radden, Günter , and Kövecses Zoltan
    1999 “Toward a Theory of Metonymy”. InMetonymy in Language and Thoughted. by K. Panther & G. Radden , 17–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
  23. Tan, Shilin
    (trans) 1992The Complete Works of Tao Yuanming. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing (Hong Kong) Company Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Taylor, John R
    2001Linguistics Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yu, Ning
    2009The Chinese Heart in a Cognitive Perspective: Culture, Body, and Language. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110213348
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213348 [Google Scholar]
  26. Watson, Burton
    (trans) 1968The Complete Works of Zhuang Tzu. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1997Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu, Yuanchong
    (trans) 2013300 Tang Poems · Collected Works of Xu Yuanchong, vol.6. Beijing: Dolphin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 陈立中
    (1996)《阴阳五行与汉语词汇学》, 长沙:岳麓书社.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 邓铁涛 , 郑洪
    (2008)中医五脏相关学说研究—从五行到五脏相关.中国工程科学 , 2, 7–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 冯友兰
    (1998)《中国哲学史新编》, 北京:人民出版社.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 顾颉刚
    (1982)《古史辩》第五册, 上海:上海人民出版社.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 贾冬梅, 蓝纯
    (2010) “Water”与“水”的认知词义对比分析.外语教学理论与实践, 3, 28–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2012) 五行之水行背后的概念借代和隐喻.外语教学, 6, 19–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2013a) 五行之土行背后的概念隐喻和借代.当代外语研究, 1, 20–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2013b) 五行之火行背后的概念借代和隐喻.外国语, 5, 36–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2013c) 五行之金行背后的概念隐喻和借代.山东外语教学, 6, 26–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2015) 五行之木行背后的概念借代和隐喻.外语与翻译, 1, 36–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 邝芷人
    (1992)《阴阳五行及其体系》, 台北:文津出版社.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 梁茼
    (2008) 中医基础课程教学中五行学说的认知解读.江苏中医药, 10, 94–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 罗竹风
    (2001)《汉语大词典》, 上海:世纪出版集团, 汉语大词典出版社.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 庞朴
    (1988)《稂莠集》, 上海:上海人民出版社.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 宋潇潇 , 周昌乐
    (2009)“东西”本义辩及换喻思维 (湖南大学学报.社会科学版), 3, 79–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 谈云雷
    (2003) 五行之说与文字.江苏技术师范学院学报, 3, 95–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 项春雁 , 郭全 , 廖娟 , 王淑阁 , 杨宇飞 , 冯运华
    (2006)中医五行音乐结合音乐电针疗法对恶性肿瘤患者抑郁状态的影响.中华护理杂志, 11, 969–972.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 徐传武
    (1989) 与“五行说”有关的词语和典故.辞书研究, 5, 82–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 徐文明
    (2001) 论五行中的金.北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2, 19–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 殷寄明
    (2006)《“说文解字”精读 》, 上海:复旦大学出版社.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 余秀忠 , 丁红杰
    (2008)“五行”之“木”考.贺州学院学报, 2, 77–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2009)“五行”之“火”考.百色学院学报, 1, 109–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 周艺
    (1989)“说文解字”中的阴阳五行说.中南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2, 101–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 庄梅云 , 贾春华 , 郭瑨 , 杨晓媛 , 伏书民 , 朱丽颖
    (2014) 基于原型范畴理论的五行原型认知研究——166名中医高校生问卷调查与分析.世界中医药, 11, 1451–1453, 1458.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.7.1.03lan
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual metaphor , conceptual metonymy , metonymy-metaphor continuum and the Five Phases
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error