1887
Conversation Analysis in Chinese
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article aims to introduce Conversation Analytic (CA) methods to the community of Chinese scholars, and especially to linguists who work with Mandarin Chinese and are just beginning to adopt CA methods in their work. I believe doing CA requires not only an understanding of its terminology but also a working knowledge of CA methods. To this end, rather than simply explaining CA methods abstractly, I offer the reader a glimpse of the research process in action by presenting data and findings of my own research and then taking the reader step-by-step through the analytic process — from initial observations of a candidate phenomenon, through the process of making a collection of cases, and finally explaining criteria for establishing an empirically-grounded finding. Special focus is placed on the importance of detecting “participants’ orientations to action” and the more difficult process of finding evidence for the phenomenon from nonconforming specimens.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.7.2.01wu
2016-12-14
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biq, Yung-O
    2000 “Recent Developments in Discourse-and-Grammar.” Hanxue Yanjiu18: 357–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biq, Yung-O. , James Tai , and Sandra A. Thompson
    1996 “Recent Developments in Functional Approaches to Chinese.” InNew Horizons in Chinese Linguistics, ed. by C.-T. James Huang , and Audrey Li , 97–140. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1608‑1_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chu, Chauncey C
    2002 “Relevance Theory, Discourse Markers and the Mandarin Utterance-Final Particle A/Ya .” Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association37 (1): 1–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Heritage, John
    1998 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society27 (3): 291–334. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500019990
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2011 “Conversaion Analysis: Practices and Methods.” InQualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 3rd ed., ed. by David Silverman , 208–230. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Charles , and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pomerantz, Anita
    1990 “On the Validity and Generalizability of Conversation Analytic Methods: Conversation Analytic Claims.” Communication Monographs57 (3): 231–235. doi: 10.1080/03637759009376198
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376198 [Google Scholar]
  9. Sacks, Harvey
    1984 “Notes on Methodology.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, eds. by John Heritage , and J. Maxwell Atkinson , 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    1982 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of Uh Huh and Other Things that Come between Sentences.” InAnalyzing Discourse: Text and Talk [Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1981], ed. by Deborah Tannen , 71–93. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1996a “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology102: 161–216. doi: 10.1086/230911
    https://doi.org/10.1086/230911 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1996b “Issues of Relevance for Discourse Analysis: Contingency in Action, Interaction and Co-Participant Context.” InComputational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account, ed. by Eduard H. Hovy , and Donia R. Scott , 3–38. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03293‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03293-0_1 [Google Scholar]
  13. 1997 “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes23: 499–545. doi: 10.1080/01638539709545001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Schegloff, Emanuel. A
    2009 “One Perspective on Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives.” InConversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell , 357–406. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670.013 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sidnell, Jack
    2013 “Basic Conversation Analytic Methods.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell , and Tanya Stivers , 77–99. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ten Have, Paul
    1999Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wootton, Anthony J
    1989 “Remarks on the Methodology of Conversation Analysis.” InConversation: An Interdisciplinary Approach, ed. by Derek Roger , and Peter Bull , 238–258. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
    2004Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.117 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2011 “A Conversation Analysis of Self-Praising in Everyday Mandarin Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 3152–3176. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.016 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 “Self-praising through Reporting: Strategic Use of Two Reporting Practices in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes49: 622–659. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2012.722060
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.722060 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2014 “Managing Turn Entry: The Design of EI-prefaced Turns in Mandarin Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics66: 139–161. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina , and John Heritage
    . forthcoming. “Particles and Epistemics: Convergences and Divergences between English and Mandarin.” InEnabling Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff ed. by Gene Lerner , Geoffrey Raymond , and John Heritage . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhu, Dexi
    1982Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures in Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.7.2.01wu
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): application , Chinese , conversation analysis , research methods and sociolinguistics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error