1887
Conversation Analysis in Chinese
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The temporal character of talk is one fundamental feature of language . As interaction unfolds, participants need to not only monitor the temporal progression of talk toward a completion, but also attend to how the current turn ties back to the preceding turns. Whereas such dual-directional consideration is often a latent aspect of turn construction, at times efforts to clear up possible ambiguity are in order. This article introduces a Mandarin practice, -preface, which seems to be used just to this end, and demonstrates an intimate relationship between the prosodic design of -preface and the displayed orientation to the intended directionality of the talk. The analysis draws upon a corpus of 35 hours of conversations collected in China.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.7.2.02wu
2016-12-14
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, Peter
    2005 “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text25 (1): 7–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth , and Sandra A. Thompson
    2005 “A Linguistic Practice for Retracting Overstatements: Concessive Repair.” InSyntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. by Auli Haulinen , and Margret Selting , 257–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.17.14cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.14cou [Google Scholar]
  4. Ford, Cecilia E. , Barbara A. Fox , and Sandra A. Thompson
    2002 “Introduction.” InThe Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford , Barbara A. Fox , and Sandra A. Thompson , 3–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goodwin, Charles
    2006 “Retrospective and Prospective Orientation in the Construction of Argumentative Moves.” Text & Talk26 (4/5): 443–461. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.018 [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodwin, Marjorie H. , and Charles Goodwin
    1987 “Children’s Arguing.” InLanguage, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, ed. by Susan U. Philips , Susan Steele , and Christine Tanz , 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayashi, Makoto
    2004 “Projection and Grammar: Notes on the ‘Action-projecting’ Use of the Distal Demonstrative are in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics36: 1337–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage , 299–345. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2013 “Action Formation and its Epistemic (and Other) Backgrounds.” Discourse Studies15: 547–574. doi: 10.1177/1461445613501449
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501449 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heritage, John , and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly68: 15–38. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu, Mingyang
    1987Beijing Hua Chu Tan [An Exploration of Beijing Mandarin]. Beijing: Commerce Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jefferson, Gail
    1972 “Side Sequences.” InStudies in Social Interaction, ed. by David N. Sudnow , 294–338. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1984 “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage , 191–222. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lerner, Gene
    1996 “On the ‘Semi-permeable’ Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Sandra A. Thompson , 238–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Pomerantz, Anita
    1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies9: 219–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sacks, Harvey
    1995Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  17. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  18. Schegloff, Emanuel. A
    1979 “The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Thomas Givón , 261–286. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Premier in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  20. Schegloff, Emanuel. A. , and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica8: 289–327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sidnell, Jack
    2007 “‘Look’-prefaced Turns in First and Second Position: Launching, Interceding and Redirecting Action.” Discourse Studies9 (3): 387–408. doi: 10.1177/1461445607076204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607076204 [Google Scholar]
  22. ten Have, Paul
    2007Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed.London: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781849208895
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
    1997 “Transforming Participation Frameworks in Multi-party Mandarin Conversation: The Use of Discourse Particles and Body Behavior.” Issues in Applied Linguistics8 (2): 97–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2012 “Self-praising through Reporting: Strategic Use of Two Reporting Practices in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes49: 622–659. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2012.722060
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.722060 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2014 “Managing Turn Entry: The Design of EI-prefaced Turns in Mandarin Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics66: 139–161. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  26. . forthcoming a. “Turn Design and Progression: The Use of Aiyou in Mandarin Conversation.” InTurn-Initial Particles Across Languages ed. by John Heritage , and Marja-leena Sorjonen . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. . forthcoming b. “Managing Participation Contingencies in Multi-party Conversation: Aiyou-prefacing as an Interactional Resource.” East Asian Pragmatics.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina , and John Heritage
    . forthcoming. “Particles and Epistemics: Convergences and Divergences between English and Mandarin.” InEnabling Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff ed. by Gene Lerner , Geoffrey Raymond , and John Heritage . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.7.2.02wu
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aiyou , conversation analysis , directionality , particles , prosody , turn design and turn progression
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error