1887
Conversation Analysis in Chinese
  • ISSN 1877-7031
  • E-ISSN: 1877-8798
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper examines two self-initiated same-turn repair operations, namely reordering and parenthesizing, in Mandarin conversation. Although both are initiated within a TCU, they often operate on global trouble sources instead of local ones internal to that TCU. On the surface, the two operations seem to share a similar formal pattern in which a TCU is first self-interrupted, and non-projected clausal materials are then produced before the interrupted TCU is resumed. What differentiate the two operations are their distinct roles in organizing TCUs in multi-unit turns. Reordering addresses the tension between the temporal sequence of the events being recounted and the temporal arrangement of the recounting. The clausal material added through reordering becomes an integral part in the rearrangement of the TCUs in that turn. Parenthesizing addresses the tension between the linearity of speech production and information management. It also addresses potential interactional problems to maintain intersubjectivity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cld.7.2.04zha
2016-12-14
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, P
    2005 “Delayed Self-repair as a Structural Device for Complex Turns in Conversation.” InSyntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen , and Margret Selting , 83–110. John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.17.06aue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.06aue [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, Helen Kai-yun
    2011Sound Patterns in Sound Patterns in Mandarin Recycling Repair. PhD thesis, University of Colorado.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chui, Kawai
    1996 “Organization of Repair in Chinese Conversation.” Text, 16(3): 343–372.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Drew, Paul , Traci Walker , and Richard Ogden
    2013 “Self-repair and Action Construction.” InConversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi , Geoffrey Raymond , and Jack Sidnell , 71–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Duvallon, Outi , and Sara Routarinne
    2005 Parenthesis as a Resource in the Grammar of Conversation. InSyntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen , and Margret Selting , 45–74. John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.17.05duv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.05duv [Google Scholar]
  6. Enfield, Nick J. , Mark Dingemanse , Julija Baranova , Joe Blythe , Penelope Brown , Tyko Dirksmeyer , Paul Drew , Simeon Floyd , Sonja Gipper , Rósa S. Gisladottir , Gertie Hoymann , Kobin H. Kendrick , Stephen C. Levinson , Lilla Magyari , Elizabeth Manrique , Giovanni Rossi , Lila San Roque , and Francisco Torreira
    2013 “Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages.” InConversational repair and human understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi , Geoffrey Raymond , and Jack Sidnell , 343–380. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fincke, Steven
    1999 “The syntactic organization of repair in Bikol.” InCognition and Function in Language, ed. by Barbara A. Fox , Dan Jurafsky , and Laura A. Michaelis , 252–267. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fox, Barbara , Fay Wouk , Makoto Hayashi , Steven Fincke , Liang Tao , Marja-Leena Sorjonen , Minna Laakso , and Wilfrido Flores Hernandez
    2009 “A Cross-linguistic Investigation of the Site of Initiation in Same-turn Self-repair.” InConversation Analysis: Comparative perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell , 60–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670.004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fox, Barbara , Makoto Hayashi , and Robert Jasperson
    1996 “A Cross-linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Sandra A. Thompson , 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.004 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fox, Barbara , Yael Maschler , and Susanne Uhmann
    2010 “A Cross-linguistic Study of Self-repair: Evidence from English, German, and Hebrew.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 2487–2505. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodwin, Charles
    1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation. InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas , 97–121. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayashi, Makoto , Geoffrey Raymond , and Jack Sidnell
    2013Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jefferson, Gail
    1974 “Error Correction as an Interactional Resource.” Language in Society, 2: 181–199. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004334
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004334 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kendrick, Kobin, H
    2015 “The Intersection of Turn-taking and Repair: The Timing of Other-initiations of Repair in Conversation.” Frontiers in Psychology6: 250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kitzinger, Celia
    2012 “Repair.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell , and Tanya Stivers , 229–256. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118325001.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  16. Laakso, Minna , and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    2010 “Cut-off or Particle – Devices for Initiating Self-repair in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (4): 1151–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lerner, Gene , and Kitzinger, Celia
    2012 “At the Intersection of Reference and Repair.” Special issue of Research on Language and Social Interaction45: 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Levinson, Stephen, C
    2014 “The Social Life of Milliseconds: New Perspectives on Timing and Projection in Turn-taking.” Plenary Talk at the 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis , June 25–29, 2014, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin, Hsueh-O
    1996 “Repair in Taiwanese Conversation.” Studies in English Literature and Linguistics22: 89–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Luke, Kang Kwong and Zhang, Wei
    2010 “Insertion as a self-repair device and its interactional motivations in Chinese conversation.” Chinese Language and Discourse, 1 (2): 153–182. doi: 10.1075/cld.1.2.01luk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.1.2.01luk [Google Scholar]
  21. Mazeland, Harrie
    2007 “Parenthetical Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics, 39: 1816–1869. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Moerman, Michael
    1977 “The Preference for Self-correction in a Thai Conversational Corpus.” Language53: 872–882. doi: 10.2307/412915
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412915 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” InStructures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed. by J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage , 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    1979 “The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-conversation.” InDiscourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón , 261–286. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1987 “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turn-taking Organisation.” InTalk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button , and John R. Lee , 70–85. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schegloff, Emanuel, A
    2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  27. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    2013 “Ten Operations in Self-initiated, Same-turn Repair.” InConversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi , Geoffrey Raymond , and Jack Sidnell , 41–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , Gail Jefferson , and Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language53: 361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  29. Selting, Margret
    1988 “The Role of Intonation in the Organization of Repair and Problem Handling Sequences in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics12: 293–322. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90035‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90035-5 [Google Scholar]
  30. Tao, Liang
    1995 “Repair in Natural Conversation of Beijing Mandarin.” The Yuan Ren Society of Chinese Dialect Data1: 55–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilkinson, Sue , and Ann Weatherall
    2011 “Insertion Repair: Practices and Actions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction40 (1): 65–91. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2011.544136
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.544136 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wu, Regina
    2006 “Initiating Repair and Beyond: The Use of Two repeat-formatted Practices in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes41 (1): 67–109. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4101_5 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu, Regina , and John Heritage
    2014 ‘Particles and Epistemics: Convergences and Divergences between English and Mandarin’. Presented at The 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis , June 25–29 2014, UCLA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, Wei , and Chan, Angela
    2013 “Self-repair in Mandarin and Cantonese: Delaying the Next Item Due in Casual Conversation and News Interview.” InChinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice, ed. by Pan Yuling , and Dániel Z. Kádár , 35–57. Equinox Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, Wei
    1998Repair in Chinese Conversation. PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong. doi: 10.5353/th_b3018254
    https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b3018254 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cld.7.2.04zha
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error