1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This is a cognitive linguistic study of a cultural-specific metaphor of a leader in Ekegusii, an African Bantu language in Kenya. A descriptive research design was used whereby the natives were asked to identify and explain the Ekegusii leader metaphorical terms and phrases, describe the social cultural values and to account for the cognitive mapping processes involved. The data collected were analyzed using the Cognitive Metaphor Theory (CMT) of Lakoff and Johnson (1980) . The results show that a leader in Ekegusii is conceptualized as a plant, animal, object or the behavior the leader exhibits (also act as X domains). It was also found out that context, values, attitude of the speaker and cultural knowledge play a major role in interpreting and understanding Ekegusii leader metaphors. The study concludes by suggesting further research of metaphors in African and other languages to enable comparisons.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00002.onc
2018-03-16
2023-12-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aristotle
    Aristotle (Trans. by Rhys Roberts ) (1954) Rhetoric. New York: The Modern Library, Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Azuma, M.
    (2012) English native speakers’ interpretation of culture-bound Japanese figurative expressions. In F. MacArthur , J. L. Oncins-Martínez , M. Sánchez-García and A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, (38), 195–216. doi: 10.1075/hcp.38.15azu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38.15azu [Google Scholar]
  3. Bosire, F.
    (1993) “Dialects rogoro and maate ”. University of Nairobi: Unpublished MA Thesis.
  4. Burke, K.
    (1945) A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chomsky, N.
    (Enlarged ed.) (1972) Language and mind. New York, MIT: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper, D.
    (1986) Metaphor. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coulson, S.
    (2007) Electrifying results: ERP data and cognitive linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez , I. Mittelberg , S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics. (pp.400–423). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.18.25cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.25cou [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans, V. & Green, M.
    (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbs, R. W.
    (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2007) Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez , I. Mittelberg , S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp.2–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.18.06gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.06gib [Google Scholar]
  11. Gleason, H. S. Jr.
    (1961) An Introduction to descriptive linguistics. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Company
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grady, J.
    (1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance, In R. Gibbs and G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp.79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.175.06gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.06gra [Google Scholar]
  13. (1997) Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive linguistics, 8(4), 267–290.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267 [Google Scholar]
  14. Guthrie, M.
    (1964).The classification of Bantu languages. London: Dawson’s Pall Mall Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hiraga, M.
    (1993) Shoohintositenojosee: metafaanimirarerujoseekan. (Women as goods: views on women seen in metaphors), Nihongogaku, 5 (12), 213–233.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jäkel, O.
    (2002) Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. Metaphorik.de, 2(1), 20–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Langacker, R.
    (1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lyons, R. J.
    (1968) Introduction to theoretical linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165570
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
  22. Maalej, Z.
    (2004) Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of an embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 51–7510.1207/S15327868MS1901_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1901_3 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mac Cormac, E. R.
    (1985) A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mittelberg, I.
    (2007) Gesture and thought, by D. McNeill . Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (3), 281–290. doi: 10.1080/10926480701357711
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701357711 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mugenda, O. & Mugenda, A.
    (1999) Research methodology: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nyakoe, D. G. , Matu, P. M. and Ongarora, D. O.
    (2012) Conceptualization of death is a Journey and death is a rest Euphemism. Theory and practice in language studies, 2 (7), 1452–1457.10.4304/tpls.2.7.1452‑1457
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.7.1452-1457 [Google Scholar]
  27. Philip, G.
    (2012) Locating metaphor in specialized corpora using raw frequency and key word lists. In F. MacArthur , J. L. Oncins-Martínez , M. Sánchez-García and A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, (38), 85–105. doi: 10.1075/hcp.38.08phi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38.08phi [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosch, E.
    (1977) Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Advances in cross-cultural psychology (pp.1–72). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ritchie, D.
    (2013) Metaphor. New York: Cambridge University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rouhi, M.
    (2011) Animal metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Iran: David Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Takada, M. , Shinohara, M. , Morizumi, F. and Sato, G.
    (2006) A study of metaphorical mapping involving socio-cultural values: How a woman is conceptualized in Japanese. In Husby, G. , Sletten, K. & M. Machaelson , (Eds.), Scandinavian journal of immunology, (2), 394–404.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Thomas, N.
    (1994) Detachable women: Gender and kinship in process of socioeconomic change among the Gusii of Kenya. American ethnologist, 21, 516–538.10.1525/ae.1994.21.3.02a00040
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.3.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
  33. Trudgill, P.
    (1973) Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of East Anglia. Language in Society, (1), 179–195.10.1017/S0047404500000488
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000488 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00002.onc
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00002.onc
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): categorization; cognitive linguistics; Ekegusii; leader; metaphor
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error