1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Cognitive Linguistic Studies
  4. Volume 4, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article attempts to account for how the static spatial relations of location between objects are encoded in Mandarin Chinese with Levinson’s notions of frames of reference and Talmy’s concept of Figure-Ground relations as theoretical guidance. Space is relational in nature, and spatial relations are embodied concepts that are at the heart of our conceptual system. That’s why they cannot be seen in the way physical objects are observed. Accordingly, I am inclined to propose that spatial relations are not natural entities in the physical world, but abstract ones that are construed and conceptualized subjectively by human beings. In accordance with the relational nature of space, Mandarin Chinese speakers usually encode the abstract spatial relation into a linguistic representation as () where is optional, when a pure static spatial relation of location between objects is construed, or into a linguistic representation as where stands for verbs of posture, when the object being located is conceived as being spatially related in a certain manner with respect to the reference object. Usually, such linguistic representations as () and are usually realized in Mandarin Chinese as two types of locative constructions: spatial relation constructions of containment/enclosure and spatial relation constructions of proximity/adjacency. What’s more, though locative constructions are related in some way to existential constructions in Mandarin Chinese, they are actually distinct from each other in three ways from a cognitive linguistics perspective: (i) they encode different spatial relations, (ii) they reveal different Figure-Ground relations, and (iii) there is a difference in definiteness of the two nominals involved.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00009.zha
2018-03-16
2024-10-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00009.zha
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Carlson, L. A.
    (2000) Object use and object location: The effect of function on spatial relations. In E. van der Zee & U. Nikanne (Eds.). Cognitive interfaces: Constraints on linking cognitive information (pp.94–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Chao, Y. R.
    (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Chappell, H. & Peyraube, A.
    (2008) Chinese localizers: Diachrony and some typological considerations. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp.15–37). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8321‑1_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8321-1_2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, W.
    (1978) Wénfǎ jiǎnlùn [A brief introduction to grammar]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheung, C. C. -H.
    (2016a) Chinese: Parts of speech. In S. -W. Chan , J. Minett & F. L. -W. Yee (Eds.). The Routledge encyclopedia of the Chinese language (pp.242–294). London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. (2016b) Parts of speech in Mandarin: The state of the art. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.10.1007/978‑981‑10‑0398‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0398-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, E. V.
    (1987) Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions. In J. H. Greenberg , C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.). Universals of human language (pp.85–126). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Coventry, K. R. & Garrod, S. C.
    2004 Saying, seeing, and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, W.
    (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A.
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E.
    (2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ernst, T.
    1988 Chinese postpositions? – again. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 16(2), 219–245.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fang, J.
    (2004) Xiàndài hànyǔ fāngwèi chéngfèn de fènhuà hé yǔfǎhuà [Differentiation and grammaticalization of locative terms in modern Chinese]. Shìjiè Hànyǔ Jiāoxué [Chinese Teaching in the World], (2), 5–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fang, Q.
    (2014) Hànyǔ hòuzhìcí yánjiū zōngshù [A survey of studies on Chinese postpositions]. Hànyǔ Xuéxí [Chinese Language Learning], (2), 80–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Frawley, W.
    (1992) Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Langacker, R. W.
    (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lemmens, M.
    (2016) Cognitive semantics. In N. Riemer (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of semantics (pp.90–105). London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Levinson, S. C.
    (1996) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom , M. Peterson , L. Nadel & M. Garrett (Eds.). Language and space (pp.109–169). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Levinson, S.
    (2003) Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613609
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
  22. Levinson, S. C. & Wilkins, D. P.
    (2006) The background to the study of the language of space. In S. C. Levinson & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity (pp.1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486753.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486753.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A.
    (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Y.
    (2009) Hànyǔ fāngwèicí de cíxìng jíqí lǐlùn yìyì (Chinese localizers: Grammatical nature and theoretical significance). Zhōngguó Yǔwén [Studies of the Chinese Language], 2, 99–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, D.
    (2002) Hànyǔ-zhōng de kuàngshì jiècí (Circumpositions in Chinese). Dāngdài Yǔyánxué [Contemporary Linguistics], 4(4), 241–253.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (2008) Syntax of space across Chinese dialects: Conspiring and competing principles and factors. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp.39–67). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8321‑1_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8321-1_3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, F. -H.
    (1998) A clitic analysis of locative particles. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 26(1), 48–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, Y. , Pan, W. & Gu, W.
    (2001) Shíyòng hànyǔ yǔfǎ [A practical modern Chinese grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Loar, J. K.
    (2011) Chinese syntactic grammar: Functional and conceptual principles. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.10.3726/978‑1‑4539‑0514‑2
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0514-2 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lyons, J.
    (1967) A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language, 3, 390–396.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. (1968) Existence, location, possession and transitivity. In B. van Rootselaar & T. F. Staal (Eds.). Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science, III (pp.495–509). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.10.1016/S0049‑237X(08)71213‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71213-8 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mark, D. M. & Frank, A. U.
    (1989) Concepts of space and spatial language. Ninth international symposium on computer-assisted cartography (Auto-Carto 9) (pp.538–556). Baltimore, Maryland.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. McHenry, R.
    (Ed.) (1993) The new encyclopedia Britannica (Vol.11). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Paul, W.
    (2015) New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110338775
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338775 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ross, C. & Ma, J. S.
    (2006) Modern Mandarin Chinese grammar: A practical guide. London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Shao, J.
    (2007) Xiàndài hànyǔ tōnglùn [Modern Chinese: A general survey], (2nd ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sun, C.
    (2008) Two conditions and grammaticalization of the Chinese locative. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp.199–227). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8321‑1_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8321-1_9 [Google Scholar]
  38. Talmy, L.
    (1972) Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Doctoral Dissertation. Linguistics Department, University of California at Berkeley.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. (1975) Figure and ground in complex sentences. In C. Cogen , H. Thompson , G. Thurgood , K. Whistler & J. Wright (Eds.). Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp.419–430). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc.Also in J. H. Greenberg , C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.) (1978) Universals of human language, Volume 4: Syntax (pp.625–649). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. (1983) How language structures space. In H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.). Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp.225–282). New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol.I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ungerer, F. and Schmid, H.
    (2006) An introduction to cognitive linguistics (2nd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Wen, L.
    (1984) Chùsuǒ, shíjiān hé fāngwèi [Location, time and direction/position]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Wierzbicka, A.
    (1996) Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wu, F.
    (2008) Origin and evolution of the locative term hòu ‘BACK’ in Chinese. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp.229–247). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8321‑1_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8321-1_10 [Google Scholar]
  46. Xing, F.
    (1997) Hànyǔ yǔfǎxué [Grammatics of Chinese]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. (2017) Modern Chinese grammar: A clause-pivot approach. Translated by Y. Wang & F. Dong . London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Xu, D.
    (2008) Introduction: How Chinese structures space. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp.1–14). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8321‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8321-1 [Google Scholar]
  49. Yip, P. C. & D. Rimmington
    (2016) Chinese: A comprehensive grammar. London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, K.
    (2014) A Cognitive Grammar approach to the SLocPAdjC in Mandarin Chinese. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 218–235.10.1075/cogls.1.2.04zha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.1.2.04zha [Google Scholar]
  51. (2016a) Mandarin existential construction as a reference-point construction: Its cognitive properties and discursive functions. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 91–112.10.1075/cogls.3.1.05zha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.3.1.05zha [Google Scholar]
  52. (2016b) Kōngjiān guānxì gòushì de rènzhī yánjiū [Cognitive studies on spatial relation constructions]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhu, D.
    (1982) Yǔfǎ jiǎngyì [Lecture notes on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Zlatev, J.
    (2007) Spatial semantics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.318–350). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00009.zha
Loading
Frames of reference and the encoding of spatial location in Mandarin Chinese
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4, 355 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00009.zha
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00009.zha
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00009.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): encoding; Figure-Ground relations; frames of reference; Mandarin Chinese; spatial location; spatial relation constructions

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error