Transcategoriality and right periphery

References

1. Anward, J.
   (2000) A dynamic model of part-of-speech differentiation. In P. M. Vogel & B. Comrie (Eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes (pp.3–45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110806120.3
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110806120.3 [Google Scholar]
2. Beal, Joan & Burbano Elizondo, Lourdes & Carmen Llamas
   (2012) Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teeside. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Clarke, Sandra
   (2010) Newfoundland and Labrador English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748626168.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748626168.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Culioli, Antoine
   (1990) Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation, Vol. 1, Opérations et représentations. L’Homme dans la langue. Paris/Gap: Ophrys.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dictionary of the Scots language
   Dictionary of the Scots language . Consulted online: www.dsl.ac.uk.
6. Enkvist, N. E.
   (1981) Experiential iconicity in text strategy. Text1, 77–111.10.1515/text.1.1981.1.1.97
   https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1981.1.1.97 [Google Scholar]
7. Fernandez-Vest, M. M. J.
   (1994) Les Particules énonciatives dans la construction du discours. (Collection Linguistique nouvelle). Paris: PUF.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fernandez-Vest, M. M. J.
   (2004) Mnémème, Antitopic – Le Post-Rhème, de l’énoncé au texte. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Shirley Carter-Thomas (Eds.), Structure Informationnelle et Particules Enonciatives – essai de typologie (Grammaire & Cognition 1–2) (pp.65–104). Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fernandez-Vest, M. M. Jocelyne
   (2006) Vers une typologie linguistique du détachement à fondement ouralien d’Europe. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de ParisC1 (1), 173–224.10.2143/BSL.101.1.2019826
   https://doi.org/10.2143/BSL.101.1.2019826 [Google Scholar]
10. Fernandez-Vest, M. M. Jocelyne
    (2015) Detachment for cohesion. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ford, C. & S. Thompson
    (1996) Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs et al. (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp.134–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003 [Google Scholar]
12. Givón, T.
    (1983) Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp.1–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.3.01giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3.01giv [Google Scholar]
13. Hancil, S.
    (2017) Final but in Northern Englishes. In S. Hancil & Joan A. Beal (Eds.), Perspectives on Northern Englishes (pp.191–211). Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110450903‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110450903-009 [Google Scholar]
14. Hancil, S.
    (Forthcoming). Discourse coherence and intersubjectivity: The development of final but in dialogues. In Sylvie Hancil & Alexander Haselow Eds. Dialogism and language change. Special issue of Language Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Lambrecht, K.
    (1981) Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.ii.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.ii.6 [Google Scholar]
17. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
18. Martinet, A.
    (1960) Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Michaelis, L. A.
    (1996) Cross-world continuity, and the polysemy of adverbial Still . In G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Space, worlds and grammar (pp.179–226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. OED. The Oxford dictionary of English
    OED. The Oxford dictionary of English . Consulted online: www.oed.com.
21. Prince, E. F.
    (1981) Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp.233–255). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Robert, S.
    (2003) Introduction: de la grammaticalisation à la transcatégorialité. In S. Robert (Ed.), Perpectives synchroniques sur la grammaticalisation (pp.85–120). Louvain-Paris: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Schegloff, E. et al.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–382.10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
24. Trudgill, P.
    (2004) New dialect formation: The inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ward, G. & B. Birner
    (1996) On the discourse function of rightward movement in English. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp.463–479). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Zipf, G. K.
    (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]