1887
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Compared to metaphors about God in the Bible, those in other Christian contexts seem to receive little academic attention. To bridge this gap, this study examines metaphors gathered from gospel songs on and iTunes to analyze the abstract concept of God from a cognitive linguistic viewpoint through extending the framework of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Our findings indicate that while diverse kinds of metaphors focus on the multi-dimensionality of God such as his characteristics (e.g., and ), outline (e.g., and ), and supreme status (e.g., ), structural metaphors tend to represent the overwhelming majority and thus form the basis for the . In addition, the flawless figure of God is suggested to result from the image schema which is responsible for hidden aspects in related metaphorical structures. Furthermore, metaphors about divine images, having their mapping details enriched by biblical context, are suggested to possess . Finally, the rhythm of ‘chain of metaphors’ is proposed to interpret how the spirit of the songs about the divine being are brought out. This study sheds light on our overall understanding of the concepts of God in Christian culture, and contributes to the development of interdisciplinary studies concerning metaphor, religion, cognition, and culture.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00017.hua
2018-08-30
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. About Billboard Magazine
    About Billboard Magazine. (n.d.). InBillboard. RetrievedAugust 8, 2016, fromhttps://www.billboard.com/p/footer/biz.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barcelona, A.
    (2003) The metaphorical and metonymic understanding of the Trinitarian dogma. International Journal of English Studies, 3 (1), 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Besançon, S. A.
    (1996) Father-ruler: The meaning of the metaphor “Father” for God in the Bible. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 39 (3), 433–442.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Botica, A.
    (2014) “The all-knowing God.” Old Testament and Hellenistic Metaphors in the genre of New Testament Apocalyptic. Caesura – Journal of Philological and Humanistic Studies, 1 (2), 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chu, M.
    (1996) The power of metaphor: Veils within Judeo-Christianity and Islam. Retrieved fromwww.artpoetryfiction.com/essays/chu/veilsbody.html.
  7. Coppens, C. S. J.
    (1903) A systematic study of the Catholic religion. St. Louis, MO: B. HERDER.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Corbin, J. M. , & Strauss, A. L.
    (2008) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781452230153
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cusic, D.
    (1990) The sound of light: A history of gospel music. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2002) The development of gospel music. In A. Moore (Ed.), Cambridge companion to blues and gospel music (pp.44–60). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DesCamp, M. T. , & Sweetser, E. V.
    (2005) Metaphors for God: Why and how do our choices matter for humans? The application of contemporary cognitive linguistics research to the debate on God and metaphor. Pastoral Psychology, 53 (3), 207–238.10.1007/s11089‑004‑0554‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-004-0554-5 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eder, S.
    (2016) “Broken hearted” and “crushed in spirit”: Metaphors and emotions in Psalm 34, 19. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, 30 (1), 1–15.10.1080/09018328.2016.1122286
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2016.1122286 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fedriani, C.
    (2016) Ontological and orientational metaphors in Latin. In W. M. Short (Ed.), Embodiment in Latin semantics (pp.115–140). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. First Great Awakening
    First Great Awakening. (n.d.). InWikipedia. RetrievedOctober 10, 2017, fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Great_Awakening.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Froom, L. E.
    (1952) Music: Camp meetings and revival music. The Ministry, 25 (8), 25–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerhart, M. , & Russell, A. M.
    (1984) Metaphoric process: The creation of scientific and religious understanding. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gonzalez, A. , & Makay, J. J.
    (1983) Rhetorical ascription and the gospel according to Dylan. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69 (1), 1–14.10.1080/00335638309383630
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638309383630 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gospel music
    Gospel music. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. RetrievedMarch 16, 2017, fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_music.
  19. Gubernatis, L.
    (2010) The magic belt and other fantastical things. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Haas, A. M.
    (1999) The nothing of God and its explosive metaphors. Eckhart Review, 8 (1), 6–17.10.1179/eck_1999_8_1_003
    https://doi.org/10.1179/eck_1999_8_1_003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Harrison, A.
    (2015, July9). Speaking of sin: Conceptual metaphor and cultural divide. Dedicated Journal. Retrieved fromhttps://blogs.corban.edu/ministry/index.php/2015/07/speaking-of-sin-conceptual-metaphor-and-cultural-divide/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hesbacher, P. , Downing, R. , & Berger, D. G.
    (1975) Sound recording popularity charts: A useful tool for music research. Popular Music and Society, 4 (1), 3–18.10.1080/03007767508591066
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03007767508591066 [Google Scholar]
  23. Howe, B.
    (2006) Because you bear this name: Conceptual metaphor and the moral meaning of 1 Peter. Leiden, the Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.10.1163/ej.9789004150959.i‑398
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004150959.i-398 [Google Scholar]
  24. iTunes
    iTunes. (n.d.). In Encyclopedia Britannica. RetrievedAugust 8, 2016, fromhttps://global.britannica.com/technology/iTunes.
  25. Jackson, J. M.
    (1995) The changing nature of Gospel music: A southern case study. African American Review, 29 (2), 185–191.10.2307/3042290
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3042290 [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Joyce, G.
    (1912) The blessed Trinity. InThe Catholic encyclopedia. New York, NY: Robert Appleton Company. RetrievedAugust 7, 2015, from New Advent: www.newadvent.org/cathen/15047a.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Keach, B.
    (1972) Preaching from the types and metaphors of the Bible (12th ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. King, P.
    (2012) Metaphor and methodology for cross-cultural investigation of Hebrew emotions. Journal of Translation, 8 (1), 9–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Klop, M. -L.
    (2015) God the exclusively Christian father: An analysis of the response of Islamic teenagers to Christian metaphors applied to Allah (Master thesis). Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kotzé, Z.
    (2004) The conceptualisation of anger in the Hebrew Bible (Doctoral dissertation). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Stellenbosch University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kövecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2011) The Biblical story retold: A cognitive linguistic perspective. In M. Brdar , S. Th. Gries & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp.325–354). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.32.19kov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.19kov [Google Scholar]
  34. (2015) Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kuczok, M.
    (2010) Conceptual metaphors for the notion of Christian life in John Henry Newman’s Parochial and Plain Sermons. Newman Studies Journal, 7 (2), 29–40.10.5840/nsj20107214
    https://doi.org/10.5840/nsj20107214 [Google Scholar]
  36. Labahn, A.
    (2006) Fire from above: Metaphors and images of God’s actions in Lamentations 2:1–9. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 31 (2), 239–256.10.1177/0309089206073100
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089206073100 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp.202–251). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Legg, A.
    (2010) A taxonomy of musical gesture in African American gospel music. Popular Music, 29 (1), 103–129.10.1017/S0261143009990407
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143009990407 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin, T. Y. -Y. , & Chiang, W. -y.
    (2016) Concrete images and abstract metaphorical extensions in the encounter between language and music: Hsu Chih-Mo’s poem “Serendipity.” Journal of Pragmatics, 96, 32–48.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  43. Marvasti, A. B.
    (2004) Qualitative research in sociology. London, England: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781849209700
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209700 [Google Scholar]
  44. McFague, S.
    (1982) Metaphorical theology: Models of God in religious language. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. McNeil, W. K.
    (Ed.) (2005) Encyclopedia of American gospel music. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Muis, J.
    (2008) God our king. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 64 (1), 269–288.10.4102/hts.v64i1.22
    https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v64i1.22 [Google Scholar]
  47. Neville, R. C.
    (2001) Symbols of Jesus: A Christology of symbolic engagement. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Nicene Creed (325) Nicaea (today, Iznik): The First Council of Nicaea.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ou, H. -H.
    (2012) Reading Biblical metaphors from the perspective of cognitive semantics – based on the recovery version and its footnotes (Doctoral dissertation). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: National Sun Yat-Sen University.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pihlaja, S.
    (2011) Cops, popes, and garbage collectors: Metaphor and antagonism in an Atheist/Christian YouTube video thread. Language and Internet, 8, 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–3910.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  52. Richardson, P.
    (2012) A closer walk: A study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World, 2 (2), 233–261.10.1075/msw.2.2.05ric
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.2.05ric [Google Scholar]
  53. Ricœur, P.
    (1977) The rule of metaphor: Multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language ( R. Czernyi , Trans.). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1975)
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sharifian, F.
    (2003) On cultural conceptualisations. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3 (3), 187–207.10.1163/156853703322336625
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703322336625 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sheed, F. J.
    (1993) Theology and sanity. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press. (Original work published 1946)
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Slick, M.
    (2008) What is the trinity?InChristian Apologetics and Research Ministry (CARM). Retrieved fromhttps://carm.org/what-trinity.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 171, 63–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. The history of gospel music. (n.d.). InGospel Music Heritage Month Foundation(GMHMF). RetrievedAugust 14, 2016, fromgospelmusicheritage.org/site/history/.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Timeline. (n.d.). InUniversity of South California Digital Library. RetrievedSeptember 9, 2015, fromdigitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/timeline/collection/p15799coll9.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Trinity. (n.d.). InEncyclopedia Britannica. RetrievedAugust 10, 2016, fromhttps://global.britannica.com/topic/Trinity-Christianity.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Trinity. (n.d.). InWikipedia. RetrievedAugust 10, 2016, fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Walker, S.
    (1998) Grounding biblical metaphor in reality: The philosophical basis of realist metaphorical language. Churchman, 112 (3), 214–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wheeler, A. P.
    (2009) The music of the early nineteenth-century camp meeting: Song in service to evangelistic revival. Methodist History, 48 (1), 23–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Yin, R. K.
    (1989) Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00017.hua
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00017.hua
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error