1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper focuses on in the Chinese language by investigating how various abstract concepts are construed in terms of spatial motion. The claim that the primary metaphor, , is central to metaphorical motion is confirmed, and we further examine sorts of target domains that are structured by spatial motion, the corresponding mappings in metaphors of entity-location pairs and orientational metaphors. Moreover, we explore how systematicity and complexity have structured the whole system. Through systematicity, coherence between different mappings and within one mapping are analyzed, and two concepts of “event” – event in “event-structure concepts” and in “motion event frame” are observed and are shown to be interrelated. By means of complexity, the specific issue of in metaphorical motion is discussed, and experiential bases – including physical, social and cultural basis for metaphorical motion is also considered.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00020.sha
2019-02-14
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alverson, H.
    (1994) Semantics and experience: universal metaphor of time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner’s English Dictionary (8th edition) (2014) Harper Collins UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Croft, W., J. Barðdal, W. Hollman, V. Sotirova, & C. Taoka
    (2002) Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. InH. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive Construction Grammar (pp.201–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dancygier, B. & E. Sweetser
    (2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gentner, D., M. Imai. & L. Boroditsky
    (2002) As time goes by: evidence for two systems in processing space time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, (17), 537–565. 10.1080/01690960143000317
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960143000317 [Google Scholar]
  6. Grady, J.
    (1997) Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation: University of California, Berkeley.
  7. (1998) The Conduit Metaphor revisited: A reassessment of metaphors for communication. InJ. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp.205–218). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
    (2003) Motion events in Basque narratives. InS. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp.89–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Accociates.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2004) Linguistic typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive linguistics, 15(3), 317–349.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2005) Leonard Talmy. A windowing to conceptual structure and language. Part 1: Lexicalisation and typology. Annual review of cognitive linguistics, 3(1), 325–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson, C.
    (1999) Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of SEE. InM. Hiraga, C. Sinha, and S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, typological and psychological issues in cognitive linguistics (pp.155–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.152.12joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.152.12joh [Google Scholar]
  12. Kövecses, Z.
    (2000) Metaphor and emotion: language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kövecses, Z.
    (2016) Where metaphors come from. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, G.
    (1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied and its challenge to western thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mandal, K.
    (1968) A comparative study of the concepts of space and time in Indian Thought. Varanas: Chowhamaba Sanskirt Studies, Vol.LXV.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Moore, K.
    (2000) Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  20. (2006) Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, (17), 199–244.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Núñez, R. & E. Sweetser
    (2006) With the future behind them: convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, (30), 401–450. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62 [Google Scholar]
  22. Oxford American Dictionary (1980) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Oxford Concise Dictionary of English Etymology (2000) Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Özçalışkan, Ş.
    (2002) Metaphors we move by: A crosslinguistic-developmental analysis of metaphorical motion events in English and Turkish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
  25. (2003a) Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16 (1), 207–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2003b) Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective: A comparison of English and Turkish. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (3), 189–228. 10.1207/S15327868MS1803_05
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_05 [Google Scholar]
  27. Özçalışkan, Ş.
    (2007) Metaphors we move by: Children’s developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (2), 147–168. 10.1080/10926480701235429
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701235429 [Google Scholar]
  28. Panther, K. U. & G. Radden
    (2011) Introduction: Reflections on motivation. InK. U. Panter & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in Grammar and the lexicon (pp.1–26). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Radden, G.
    (2003) The metaphor time as space across languages. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 8(2/3), 226–239.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Shinohara, K.
    (2000) Constraints on motion verbs in the time is motion metaphor. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 250–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2002) Correspondence between the spatial front/back axis and temporal concepts in Japanese. InShirai et al. (Eds.), Studies in Language Sciences (pp.281–298). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Slobin, D. I.
    (1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. InM. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp.195–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1997) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2004) The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. InS. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp.219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Talmy, L.
    (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. InT. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description: Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp.36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (1991) Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Traugott, E.
    (1978) On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in Language. InJ. Greenberg et al (Eds.), Universals of human language. Vol.3, Word structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Yu, N.
    (1995) Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10 (2), 59–92. 10.1207/s15327868ms1002_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1002_1 [Google Scholar]
  40. (1998) The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.1 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2012) The metaphorical orientation of time in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 44 (10), 1335–1354. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wen, X. & Yang, K.
    (2016) Systematicity and complexity of IDEA metaphors in Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(4), 230–249. 10.1080/10926488.2016.1223469
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1223469 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00020.sha
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese , complexity , entity-location duality , event , metaphorical motion and systematicity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error