Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Using the Conceptual Metaphor Theory, this study discusses the transfer of semantic aspects of foodsemic metaphors upon the abstraction of love. An interview schedule was administered to 48 respondents of different gender by the researchers assisted by two research assistants. The data collected were subjected to the Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIPVU). 12 foodsemic metaphors which play an indispensable role in the understanding of love in Gĩkũyũ were identified. In addition, the study noted that gender is a dominant variable that provides people with lens through which they view love in Gĩkũyũ. This study concludes that metaphor is an integral component of the way people conceptualize and embody love in Gĩkũyũ. Further, foodsemic metaphors provide a way of understanding the nexus between gender and love in Gĩkũyũ.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aksan, M.
    (2006) The container metaphor in Turkish expressions of anger. Dilve Edebiyat Dergisi / Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 3 (2), 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, K., & Burridge, K.
    (2006) Forbidden words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ansah, G.
    (2010) The cultural basis of conceptual metaphors: The case of emotions in Akan and English. Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching (pp.1–25). Lancaster University, Lancaster.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barcelona, A.
    (1998) The state of the art in the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and metonymy and its application to English studies. The European English Messenger, 7 (2), 45–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barker, C., Elliott, R., & Pistrang, N.
    (2004) PSY7640: Methods of clinical requirements. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, B. R.
    (2004) Audiences, metaphors, and the Persian Gulf War. Communication Studies, 55(3), 447–463. 10.1080/10510970409388631
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388631 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beall, A. E., & Sternberg, R. J.
    (1995) The social construction of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12 (3), 417–438. 10.1177/0265407595123006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595123006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beneke, T.
    (1982) Men on rape: What they have to say about sexual violence. New York: St. Martin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Berscheid, E.
    (2006) Searching for the meaning of “love”. InR. J. Sternberg, & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp.171–183). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Berscheid, E.
    (2010) Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bialystok, E.
    (2002) Cognitive processes of L2 users. InV. Cook (Ed.), Portrait of the L2 user (pp.147–165). New York: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853595851‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595851-008 [Google Scholar]
  12. Buss, D. M.
    (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis testing in 37 cultures. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. 10.1017/S0140525X00023992
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron, L.
    (2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chilton, P.
    (2005) Manipulation, memes and metaphors: the case of Mein Kampf. InL. D. Saussure and P. Schulz (Eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century (pp.15–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.17.03chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.03chi [Google Scholar]
  16. Cienki, A.
    (2005) Metaphor in the “Strict Father” and “Nurturant Parent” cognitive models: A test case for two models of metaphors. Journal of language and politics, 3, 409–440. 10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.04cie [Google Scholar]
  17. Crespo-Fernández, E.
    (2008) Sex-related euphemism and dysphemism. An analysis in terms of conceptual metaphor theory. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 30 (2), 95–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2013) Euphemistic metaphors in English and Spanish epitaphs: A comparative study. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 35 (2), 99–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dragoescu, A.
    (2011) Implications of quality in food metaphors. 5th International Quality Conference, 673–678.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Esenova, O.
    (2007) Plant metaphors for the expression of emotions in the English language. Beyond Philology, 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fiddes, N.
    (1991) Meat: A natural symbol. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fisher, H.
    (1998) Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature, 9, 23–52. 10.1007/s12110‑998‑1010‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1010-5 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fontecha, A. F., & Catalan, R. M.
    (2003) Semantic derogation in animal metaphor: A contrastive-cognitive analysis of two male/female examples in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (5), 771–797. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00127‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00127-3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Forceville, C.
    (2002) The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1–14. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00007‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00007-8 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gachara, M.
    (2012) Gĩkũyũ metaphors of marriage negotiations: A cognitive linguistics perspective (Unpublished doctorate thesis), Kenyatta University, Kenya.
  26. Galperin, A., & Haselton, M.
    (2010) Predictors of how often and when people fall in love. Evolutionary Psychology, 8 (1), 5–28. 10.1177/147470491000800102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800102 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gathigia, M., & Ndũng’ũ, R.
    (2011) A cognitive linguistics analysis of Gĩkũyũ euphemisms. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Publishing House Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibbs, R. W.
    (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2008) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gibbs, R. W., & Steen, G.
    (1999) Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175 [Google Scholar]
  31. Glucksberg, S.
    (2001) Understanding figurative language. From metaphor to idiom, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Guthrie, M.
    (1967) The classification of Bantu languages. London: Dawsons of Pall Mall.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Györi, G.
    (1998) Cultural variation in the conceptualisation of emotions: A historical study. InA. Athanasiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualisation and expression (pp.99–124). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110806007.99
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110806007.99 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R.
    (1996) Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hinnerová, K.
    (2007) Food as a transcultural metaphor: Food imagery and ethnocultural identities in contemporary multicultural women writing in Canada. Unpublished Diploma Thesis ofMasaryk University of Brno.
  36. Hoorweg, J., & Niemeyer, R.
    (1980) Preliminary studies on some aspects of Kikuyu food habits. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 9, 139–150. 10.1080/03670244.1980.9990593
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1980.9990593 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jankowiak, W. R., & Fisher, E. F.
    (1992) A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31(2), 149–155. 10.2307/3773618
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3773618 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kleparski, G. A.
    (2008) The joys and sorrows of metaphorical consumption: Mozarellas, prostisciuttos, muttons and yum-yum girls – foodsemy with a romance accent, z e s z y t y n a u k owe uniwersyteturzeszowskiego, seria filologicznastudiaanglicaresoviensia5, 45–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kolodny, N.
    (2003) Love as valuing a relationship. The Philosophical Review, 112 (2), 135–189. 10.1215/00318108‑112‑2‑135
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-112-2-135 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kövecses, Z.
    (1986) Metaphor of anger, pride and love. A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.vii.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.8 [Google Scholar]
  41. (1991) Happiness: A definitional effort. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6 (1), 29–46. 10.1207/s15327868ms0601_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0601_2 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and the body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2006) Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2010) Metaphor and culture. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 2 (2), 197–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Knowles, M., & Rosamund, M.
    (2006) Introducing metaphor. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Krennmayr, T.
    (2008) Using dictionaries in linguistic metaphor identification. InN. L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp.97–115). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kunda, Z.
    (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. 10.1037/0033‑2909.108.3.480
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lakoff, G.
    (1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (1), 39–74. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39 [Google Scholar]
  50. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp.202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Lakoff, G., and Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Leakey, L. S.
    (1977) The Southern Kikuyu before 1903. London: Academie Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, X.
    (2010) Conceptual metaphor theory and teaching of English and Chinese idioms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1 (3), 206–210. 10.4304/jltr.1.3.206‑210
    https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.206-210 [Google Scholar]
  56. Liebowitz, M. R.
    (1983) The chemistry of love. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Maalej, Z.
    (2004) Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19 (1), 51–75. 10.1207/S15327868MS1901_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1901_3 [Google Scholar]
  58. Mbaabu, I.
    (1996) Language policy in East Africa: A dependency theory perspective. Nairobi: Educational Research Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Molek-Kozakowska, K.
    (2014) Coercive metaphors in news headlines: A cognitive-pragmatic approach. Brno Studies in English, 40 (1), 1–21. 10.5817/BSE2014‑1‑8
    https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2014-1-8 [Google Scholar]
  60. Moustakas, C.
    (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781412995658
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658 [Google Scholar]
  61. Mugane, J. M.
    (1997) A paradigmatic grammar of Gikuyu. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. O’Brien, R. D.
    (1998) Fats and oils: Formulating and processing for applications. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Oliver, M., & Hyde, J.
    (1993) Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51. 10.1037/0033‑2909.114.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  64. Pockenpaugh, N., & Poleman, C.
    (1996) Nutrition: Essential and diet therapy (8th ed.). Philadelphia: WB Saunders.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Rozin, P.
    (1996) Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 18–24. 10.1111/1467‑8721.ep10772690
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772690 [Google Scholar]
  66. Semino, E., & Steen, G.
    (2008) Metaphor in literature. InR. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.232–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015 [Google Scholar]
  67. Steen, G.
    (2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10 [Google Scholar]
  68. Steen, G. et al.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From mip to mipvu . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  69. Van Manen, M.
    (1990) Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang, R.
    (2008) A holographic study of metaphors concerning love in Chinese. Intercultural Communication Studies, 17 (1), 90–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Yu, N.
    (1998) The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.1 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Conceptual Metaphor Theory; foodsemic metaphors; love; metaphor; MIPVU
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error