1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Cognitive Linguistic Studies
  4. Volume 5, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The avoidance of directly addressing human mortality indicates fear of death. This fear elicits psychological, social and religious interdictions in language such that people resort to the use of metaphors to avoid confronting death. Under the premise that metaphor is a conceptual mapping from a concrete source to an abstract target domain, this study aims to identify and categorize euphemistic metaphors of death in six languages: Chinese, Farsi, Gĩkũyũ, Russian, Spanish, and Swedish. Those metaphors are interpreted via the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). In doing so, 40 speakers in each of the languages were asked to complete a short questionnaire. Various metaphors of death were identified in each language and categorized into four conceptual metaphors: ; and . The key finding is that the most common metaphor of death is . This holds across linguistic groups regardless of gender and age factors. This study also discusses the role of embodied cognition theories in accounting for how metaphors of death are created and their role within cognition in general.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00025.gat
2019-02-14
2025-03-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00025.gat
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agresti, A.
    (2002) Categorical data analysis (2nd edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/0471249688
     https://doi.org/10.1002/0471249688 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahrens, K.
    (2002) When love is not digested: Underlying reasons for source to target domain pairings in the contemporary theory of metaphor. Proceedings of the First Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp.273–302). Cheng-Chi University, China.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Allan, K., & Burridge, K.
    (2006) Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alm-Arvius, C.
    (2008) Metaphor and metonymy. InN. L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp.3–24). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ansah, G.
    (2010) The cultural basis of conceptual metaphors: The case of emotions in Akan and English. Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching (pp.1–25). Lancaster University, Lancaster.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Aries, P.
    (1974) Western attitudes toward death: from the Middle Ages to the present. Baltimore, U.S.A.: John Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Aubed, M. M.
    (2011) A study of English death euphemisms with reference to their translations into Arabic: A case study. Tikrit University Journal for Humanities, 18 (2), 79–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Barsalou, L. W.
    (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (4), 577–660.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bultnick, B.
    (1998) Metaphors we die by: Conceptualizations of death in English and their implications for the theory of metaphor. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Burridge, K.
    (2004) Blooming English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2005) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230501706
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheung, W., & Ho, S.
    (2004) The use of death metaphors to understand personal meaning of death among Hong Kong Chinese undergraduates. Death Studies, 28(1), 47–62. 10.1080/07481180490249265
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180490249265 [Google Scholar]
  14. Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C.
    (2002) Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition, 30, 958–968. 10.3758/BF03195780
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195780 [Google Scholar]
  15. Crespo-Fernández, E.
    (2006) The language of death: Euphemism and conceptual metaphorization in Victorian obituaries. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 19, 101–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (2008) Sex-related euphemism and dysphemism: An analysis in terms of conceptual metaphor theory. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 30 (2), 95–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (2011) Conceptual metaphors in taboo-induced lexical variation. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 24, 53–71. 10.14198/raei.2011.24.03
     https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2011.24.03 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2013) Euphemistic metaphors in English and Spanish epitaphs: A comparative study. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 35 (2), 99–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Deignan, A.
    (2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dudschig, C., de la Vega, I. & Kaup, B.
    (2015) What’s up? Emotion-specific activation of vertical space during language processing. Acta Psychologica, 156, 143–155. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.015 [Google Scholar]
  21. Evans, N., & Levinson, S.
    (2009) The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–432. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  22. Feldman, A., Goussev, V., Sangole, A., & Levin, M.
    (2007) Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. Progress in Brain Research, 165, 267–281. 10.1016/S0079‑6123(06)65017‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65017-6 [Google Scholar]
  23. Friendly, M.
    (1994) Mosaic displays for multi-way contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 190–200. 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476460
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476460 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
    (2005) The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3), 455–479. 10.1080/02643290442000310
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gathigia, M., & Ndungu, R.
    (2011) A cognitive linguistics analysis of Gĩkũyũ euphemisms. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Publishing House Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gathigia, M. G., Ndungu, R. W., & Orwenjo, D. O.
    (2015) When romantic love in Gĩkũyũ becomes a human body part: A cognitive approach. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2 (1), 79–93. 10.1075/cogls.2.1.04gat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.2.1.04gat [Google Scholar]
  27. Gibbs Jr., R. W.
    (2006) Introspection and cognitive linguistics: Should we trust our own intuitions?Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 135–151. 10.1075/arcl.4.06gib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.06gib [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibbs, R., & Colston, H.
    (2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gibbs, R. W.
    (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Glenberg, A., & Gallese, V.
    (2012) Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48 (7), 905–922. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  31. Guthrie, M.
    (1967) The classification of Bantu languages. London: Dawsons of Pall Mall.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hampe, B., & Grady, J. E.
    (2005) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (Vol.29). Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532.0.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.0.1 [Google Scholar]
  33. Herrero Ruiz, J.
    (2007) At the crossroads between literature, culture, linguistics, and cognition: Death metaphors in fairy tales. Resla, 20, 59–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D.
    (in press). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin. 10.1037/bul0000145
     https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000145 [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnson, M.
    (2005) The philosophical significance of image schemas. InB. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp.15–33). Amsterdam: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532.1.15
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.15 [Google Scholar]
  36. Khatin Zadeh, O., & Vahdat, S.
    (2015) Abstract and concrete representations in structure-mapping and class-inclusion. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2 (2), 349–360. 10.1075/cogls.2.2.07kha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.2.2.07kha [Google Scholar]
  37. Kövecses, Z.
    (1990) Emotion concepts. U.S.A: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑3312‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3312-1 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and the body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. (2003) Language, figurative thought, and cross-cultural comparison. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (4), 311–320. 10.1207/S15327868MS1804_6
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1804_6 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2005) Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2006) Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Krauss, M.
    (1992) The world’s languages in crisis. Language, 68 (1), 4–10. 10.1353/lan.1992.0075
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0075 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lakoff, G.
    (2008) The neural theory of metaphor. InR. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor, and thought (pp.17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2014) Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8 (958. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by (1st edition). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. (2003) Metaphors we live by (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Landau, M.
    (2010) A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136 (6), 1045–1067. 10.1037/a0020970
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020970 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee, R.
    (2008) Modernity, mortality and re-enchantment: The death taboo revisited. Sociology, 42 (4), 745–759. 10.1177/0038038508091626
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508091626 [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu, D.
    (2002) Metaphor, culture, and worldview: The case of American English and the Chinese language. Lanham: University Press of America.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Machakanja, I.
    (2006) Conceptual metaphors in English and Shona. A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural study (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Pretoria: University of South Africa.
  54. Marín-Arrese, J. I.
    (1996) To die, to sleep. A contrastive study of metaphors for death and dying in English and Spanish. Language Sciences, 18 (1–2), 37–52. 10.1016/0388‑0001(96)00006‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(96)00006-X [Google Scholar]
  55. Montoro, P. R., Contreras, M. J., Elosúa, M. R., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F.
    (2015) Cross-modal metaphorical mapping of spoken emotion words onto vertical space. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 (1205). 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01205.
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01205 [Google Scholar]
  56. Morison, R. S.
    (1971) Death: process or event?Science, 173 (3998), 694–698. 10.1126/science.173.3998.694
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3998.694 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mugane, J.
    (1997) A paradigmatic grammar of Gĩkũyũ. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. National Bureau of Statistics
    National Bureau of Statistics (2009) Population demographics. Nairobi: Government Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Nayak, N. P., & Gibbs, R.
    (1990) Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19 (3), 315–330. 10.1037/0096‑3445.119.3.315
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.315 [Google Scholar]
  60. Pazzaglia, M.
    (2013) Action and language grounding in the sensorimotor cortex. Language and Cognition, 5 (2–3), 211–223. 10.1515/langcog‑2013‑0015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0015 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruiz, H.
    (2007) At the crossroads between literature, culture, linguistics, and cognition: death metaphors in fairy tales. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 20, 59–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Sauciuc, G. A.
    (2009) The role of metaphor in the structuring of emotion concepts. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5 (1–2), 244–267.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Sayer, D.
    (2010) Who’s afraid of the dead? Archaeology, modernity and the death taboo. World Archaeology, 42 (3), 481–491. 10.1080/00438243.2010.498665
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2010.498665 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sexton, J.
    (1997) The semantics of death and dying: Metaphor and mortality. A Review of General Semantics, 54 (3), 333–345.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Sharifian, F.
    (2011) Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.1 [Google Scholar]
  66. Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From mip to mipvu . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  67. Valdorra, M., & Yohai, V. J.
    (2014) Robust estimators for generalized linear models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 146, 31–48. 10.1016/j.jspi.2013.09.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2013.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  68. Walter, T.
    (1991) Modern death: Taboo or not taboo?Sociology, 25 (2), 293–310. 10.1177/0038038591025002009
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038591025002009 [Google Scholar]
  69. World Medical Association
    World Medical Association (2013) Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310 (20), 2191–2194. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
     https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 [Google Scholar]
  70. Xie, J., Huang, Y., Wang, R., & Liu, W.
    (2015) Affective valence facilitates spatial detection on vertical axis: shorter time strengthens effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(277). 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0027.
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0027 [Google Scholar]
  71. Yu, N.
    (2003) The bodily dimension of meaning in Chinese: What do we do and mean with “hands”?InE. H. Casad & B. P. Gray (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages (pp.337–362). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197150.8.337
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197150.8.337 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2009) From body to meaning in culture. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.149
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.149 [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhong, C. -B., & Leonardelli, G. J.
    (2008) Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold?Psychological Science, 19 (9), 838–842. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02165.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02165.x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00025.gat
Loading
A cross-linguistic study of metaphors of death
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5, 359 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00025.gat
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00025.gat
/content/journals/10.1075/cogls.00025.gat
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognitive linguistics; death; embodiment; euphemism; metaphorical mapping; metaphors

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error