Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8722
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The paper deals with semantic relations in the field of proverbs from the standpoint of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Our main claim is that proverb understanding is conceptually complex, involving many construal operations, namely metaphor. Metaphor is assumed to play a crucial role in framing and relating proverbs to one another via various semantic relationships. Three semantic relations will be highlighted: synonymy, antonymy and polysemy. Synonymous proverbs will be shown to be structured by similar metaphors, whereas antonymous proverbs by contradictory metaphors. As regards polysemous proverbs, our focus will be on a specific polysemy, consisting of contradictory meanings. Overall, we will attempt to build a cognitive model for proverbs semantic relationships, based on three main assumptions: first, proverbs have relatively stable meaning. Second, rather than sharply distinct, conventionalized meaning and contextual meaning of proverbs form a continuum, residing in their common conceptual base. Third, such a common conceptual base is metaphor-dependent.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alverson, H.
    (1994) Semantics and experience: Universal metaphors of time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baron, R., & Byrne, D.
    (1981) Social psychology: Understanding human behaviour. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Callies, M.
    (2017) ‘Idioms in the making’ and variation in conceptual metaphor. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 63–81. 10.1075/cogls.4.1.04cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.04cal [Google Scholar]
  4. Cram, D.
    (1994) The linguistic status of the proverb. InW. Mieder (Ed.), Wise words: Essays on the proverb (pp.73–98). New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DeHaene, S.
    (2009) Reading in the brain. New York: Penguin Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbs, R., & Beitel, D.
    (1995) What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 133–154. 10.1037/0033‑2909.118.1.133
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.133 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gibbs, R., Strom, L., & Spivey-Knowlton, M.
    (1997) Conceptual metaphors in mental imagery for proverbs. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21, 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldman, J.
    (2006) From molecule to metaphor. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldman, C. J., & Narayanan, S.
    (2004) Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385–392. 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00355‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00355-9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T.
    (1992) Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. InA. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp.75–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Furnham, A.
    (1987) The proverbial truth: Contextually reconciling and the truthfulness of antonymous Proverbs. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 49–55. 10.1177/0261927X8700600103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8700600103 [Google Scholar]
  12. Handl, S., & Schmid, H.-J.
    (Eds.) (2011) Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238198
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238198 [Google Scholar]
  13. Honeck, R. P.
    (1997) A proverb in mind: The cognitive science of proverbial wit and wisdom. London: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hughes, R.
    (1958) Post-tetanic Potentiation. Physiological Reviews, 1, 91–113. 10.1152/physrev.1958.38.1.91
    https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1958.38.1.91 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B.
    (1973) Toward a theory of proverb meaning. Proverbium, 22, 821–827.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kövecses, Z.
    (1986) Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: A lexical approach to the atructure of concepts. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.vii.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.8 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1988) The language of love: The semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1990) Emotion concepts. Berlin/New York: Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑3312‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3312-1 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2000) Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2015a) Surprise as a conceptual category. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13, 270–290. 10.1075/rcl.13.2.01kov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.2.01kov [Google Scholar]
  23. (2015b) Where metaphors come from: reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition (pp202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2004) Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2013) Neural social science. InD. Franks & J. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of neurosociology (pp.9–25). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑4473‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_2 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2016) Language and emotion. Emotion Review, 3, 269–273. 10.1177/1754073915595097
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915595097 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites, vol.1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 1–38. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2013) Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lemghari, E.
    (2017) Conceptual metaphors as motivation for proverbs lexical polysemy. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3, 57–70. doi:  10.11648/j.ijll.20170503.11
    https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20170503.11 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lucek, S.
    (2017) Metaphor variation of spatial conceptualizations in Irish English. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 36–62. 10.1075/cogls.4.1.03luc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.03luc [Google Scholar]
  36. Manser, M.
    (2007) The facts on file dictionary of proverbs: Meanings and origins of more than 1,700 popular sayings, 2nd edition. New York: Infobase Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Milner, G. B.
    (1969) What is a proverb? New Society, 332, 199–2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Narayanan, S.
    (1997) Embodiment in language understanding: Sensory-motor representations for metaphoric reasoning about event descriptions (Doctoral thesis). Berkeley: University of California.
  39. Obelkevich, J.
    (1987) Proverbs and social history. InP. Burk & R. Porter (Eds.), The social history of language (pp.43–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Onysko, A.
    (2017) Conceptual metaphor variation in meaning interpretation: Evidence from speakers of New Zealand English. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 7–35. 10.1075/cogls.4.1.02ony
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.02ony [Google Scholar]
  41. Parades, A.
    (1970) Proverbs and ethnic stereotypes. Proverbium, 15, 505–507.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
    (1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. InK.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp.17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
  43. Reddy, M.
    (1979) The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.228–324). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, F.
    (2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp.109–132). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schubert, T. W.
    (2005) Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21. 10.1037/0022‑3514.89.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sharifian, F., Yu, N., Dirven, R., & Niemeier, S.
    (Eds.) (2008) Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199109 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
    (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sweetser, E.
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  49. Teigen, K.
    (1986) Old truths or fresh insights? A study of students’ evaluations of proverbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 43–49. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1986.tb00700.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00700.x [Google Scholar]
  50. White, G. M.
    (1987) Proverbs and cultural models: An American psychology of problem solving. InD. Holland, & N. Quinn, (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.151–172). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607660.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.007 [Google Scholar]
  51. Yankah, K.
    (1984) Do proverbs contradict?Folklore Forum, 17, 2–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Yu, N.
    (1998) The Contemporary theory of metaphor in Chinese: A Perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.1 [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K.
    (2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing”. Science, 313, 1451–1452. 10.1126/science.1130726
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G.
    (2008) Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold?Psychological Science, 9, 838–842. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02165.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02165.x [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual metaphor; frame; metaphorical pluralism; proverb; semantic relations
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error